|
11-04-2006, 12:39 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: sd, ca
Posts: 108
|
what constitutes a hwy drag race? hopefully not some fast and furious type stuff
where's my double stack aluminum rear wing?
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 06:58 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
The boxster S is faster 0-60 and definately faster on a highway roll than a S2000. S2000's suck on highway rolls so I hear because they don't have any torque. S200's have similar weight and way less TQ and less Hp than a 03 boxster S.
[QUOTE=Moostang]what constitutes a hwy drag race?
QUOTE]
A highway race usually means 3 honks and hit the gas.
Last edited by Adam; 11-04-2006 at 07:11 PM.
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 08:45 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 373
|
(thanks Randall for the syntax help)
Speaking of S2000s...
Me and a friend are just up in Malibu today and three of them pull up behind us plus a rented Elise. Nice enough guys, they apparently got a -great- rental deal on the Elise from Enterprise of all places that they took out of the day to see how it compared. They didn't seem too thrilled with going up against our S and/or 300zx tt there in the background...even tho we were hardly in roads that would qualify as 'highway'
Last edited by David N.; 11-05-2006 at 07:00 PM.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 05:17 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
|
David, your pic will show up if you replace the "\\" with "//" in the address.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 06:27 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
[QUOTE=Adam]The boxster S is faster 0-60 and definately faster on a highway roll than a S2000. S2000's suck on highway rolls so I hear because they don't have any torque. S200's have similar weight and way less TQ and less Hp than a 03 boxster S.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moostang
what constitutes a hwy drag race?
QUOTE]
A highway race usually means 3 honks and hit the gas.
|
An S2000 weighs less than a Boxster S. A Boxster S weighs about 3,000 lbs. S2000s are down around 2800. Regardless, at freeway speeds weight doesn't matter nearly as much as it does from a standing start.
Discounting for the moment that "racing" on the freeway is idiotic, both cars will be pretty even unless one of the drivers chooses the wrong gear.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 07:14 AM
|
#6
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
An S2000 weighs less than a Boxster S. A Boxster S weighs about 3,000 lbs. S2000s are down around 2800. Regardless, at freeway speeds weight doesn't matter nearly as much as it does from a standing start.
Discounting for the moment that "racing" on the freeway is idiotic, both cars will be pretty even unless one of the drivers chooses the wrong gear.
|
The published curb weight of a Boxster S is 2855lb. Any time you accelerate, weight (or more accurately, mass) matters. Even at highway speeds.
Agreed on the idiotic freeway antics.
|
|
|
11-07-2006, 07:08 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
That published curb weight may be correct if the car has no fluids on board, but it's not correct otherwise. Numerous examples of 3.2L cars have been on the scales at SCCA autocrosses in stock trim and the lightest I've ever seen is just under 2900lbs - that's with no exhaust, 18lb wheels, light tires, and next to no gas.
At highway speeds weight matters, but a whole lot less than from a stop. Which is what I said.
|
|
|
11-07-2006, 07:29 PM
|
#8
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
That published curb weight may be correct if the car has no fluids on board, but it's not correct otherwise. Numerous examples of 3.2L cars have been on the scales at SCCA autocrosses in stock trim and the lightest I've ever seen is just under 2900lbs - that's with no exhaust, 18lb wheels, light tires, and next to no gas.
At highway speeds weight matters, but a whole lot less than from a stop. Which is what I said.
|
And what does the S2000 weigh wet?
Mass effects acceleration at any starting speed. The forces of drag are more of a percentage of the total force on the car, maybe that's what you mean?
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 06:17 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 123
|
Hmmmmm
Hmmmmm, German car and a Jap car... I will take the German car any day versus a Jap, thats a no brainer. The German's invented Performance the Japs just started...
|
|
|
11-10-2006, 05:00 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
And what does the S2000 weigh wet?
Mass effects acceleration at any starting speed. The forces of drag are more of a percentage of the total force on the car, maybe that's what you mean?
|
We are saying the same thing but wording it differently. Mass is a lower percent contributor to the total force holding the car back from accelerating when traveling at freeway speeds.
S2000s are in the low 2800lb range with all fluids. About 150-200lbs lighter than a Boxster S.
S2000s are very quick and capable cars, on par with a Boxster S. In terms of quality, it's a toss-up. They are very well constructed cars and the quality of materials is very very good. The Boxster has some advantages like a much nicer top (insulated and lined - makes a big difference) and a much more refined driving experience. It's quieter and more luxurious. The penalty is weight.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 AM.
| |