I mocked up the intake and the silicone boots fit perfectly. They were 3.75 to 3.5 reducers. They were 3” long so I had to trim 3/4” from each side to make them close to the original boot size. I’ll try to get pics up later.

@truegearhead. My 2.5l harness only has 2 oxygen sensor connectors. Do you know if there is a sort of “jumper harness“ that the 2.5’s used. Also the temp(?) sensor is the front oil passage is a different connector. Do you remember if you had to change yours?

Progress Report: Spent a couple of hours yesterday in the garage. I was able to rehab the 2.5 harness as it was oil soaked from the previous vehicle. I wiped down all the exposed wires with brakeclean and replaces the cloth electrical tape with the same purchased on Amazon along with some mesh wire loom for about $30. All looks pretty clean now. I mocked up the upper intake using the throttle body and runner from the 2.5 and the back runner from the 2.7. For the TB runner I used some silicone adapters bought for $9 each and trimmed them down. I removed the vac valve from the rear runner and am looking for something to plug the holes with. Lastly I wired the engine with the 2.5l harness. A couple of problems I ran into were the O2 connectors are different from 99 to 02 and I have the stock 02 manifolds on still. Also there were only 2 O2 connectors on the 2.5 harness I will have to take a closer look at the 99 exhaust (it is in a separate location) this is easily fixed I just have to decide which exhaust to go with. The MAF connector is also different. Not sure if I have the MAF from the 99 or not?? I know that this thread may not be very interesting to many as I am swapping the 2nd least desirable engine for the least desirable engine but my reason for doing so is simple. I have a very clean and good running 99 that I don't want to do anything to this satisfies my itch to tinker with the Boxster plus the cost to this point is very low (probably have 1/3 of the low book invested via some good luck and a little negotiation. Thanks for following.http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1612099373.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1612099395.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1612099766.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1612099777.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1612099792.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1612099817.jpg

Nice work! Keep us posted, 2.5l engines are becoming rare so this is valuable info. You may want to put an S oil cooler on while you have the engine out, nice cheap upgrade

Thanks for the info !!

I find this fascinating - any idea where the power came from? Did you get any afr readings? Maybe it was running lean and that's where the power came from? Maybe the resonance flapper is actually a handicap (the idea, while I understand the intended purpose, just seems absolutely ridiculous) and deleting it provided a smoother intake flow?

Sent from my POCOPHONE F1 using Tapatalk

You need to read up on Helmholtz resonance technology before call that device a handicap.....................

I'm not sure I understand what you mean - Helmholtz resonance refers to dynamic resonance inside of a closed container with a single point of entry.

I understand the purpose of the valve - it is porsche's version of a variable length intake that utilizes in the concept of longer length results in smoother flow which increases velocity into the valves for enhancement of midrange torque, and but utilizing shorter intakes at low rpms and high rpm in order to decrease overall resistance of the system.

My use of the term handicap simply is a reflection of my doubt about the system's ability to accomplish this task. There would need to be a standing wave whose frequency rises in correspondence with the motor rpm or else the system could actually work in reverse and be pushing air away from the open valves. This would be exceptionally difficult to accomplish since we're talking frequency in the 100hz range. Anything other than perfect synchrony would hurt performance. Hence...handicap.

You seem to be one of the most experienced people in the forum in regards to the form and function of these machines. What do you think about the increased torque output of running a 2.7l on a 2.5l tune without a resonance flapper?



Sent from my POCOPHONE F1 using Tapatalk

Hey Dllrd23, any progress in the last few weeks?

More to come Sunday. Have half of a day planned for RMS/IMS maybe going to film it and discuss some of the items to change over from 2.5 to 2.7. Just got a couple of boxes of parts from Pelican and I am itching to get back in to it. Thanks for the interest.

We did check AFR during the dyno run, if I could find the damn graph the AFR readings are plotted on the same graph as the power curve. I was completely surprised by the addition HP, I was only swapping the 2.7 in because my 2.5 blew up (failed accusump) and I had a cheap line on a 2.7.

Progress report
 

Progress today: Had high hopes of getting a lot done on the 2.7 as my first Pelican shipment has arrived. Water Pump, T-stat, 4 camshaft seals, Pelican "good-as-new" IMS bearing, tensioner o-rings and seals, and new AOS. I fabricated some camshaft holders out of a piece of stock and they worked better than expected. Pulled the tensioners and nothing moved. Went to use my homemade IMS bearing puller and discovered that the threaded shaft on the center blank was smaller that that on the 1999 2.5l boxster that I made the tool for. you can see video of the tool and the results from the 2.5 here: https://youtu.be/3WvianmKEAg Anyway, I'm going to have to make some corrections to the tool tomorrow at work and then hopefully pull and install the bearing tomorrow. I videoed the whole thing and will be posting to You Tube as well as pics/Narrative here. If you want to follow progress, please subscribe to the channel associated to the link above or check back here for updates. I'm really enjoying this project and excited to share with anyone interested. Again, thanks for following and I hope to have some pics up this week.

Here is what I learned so far. The hardest part of this is going to be the o2 sensors. I am thinking that my solution is going to be replacing all 4 with longer pigtails so that I can use the 2.7 exhaust if for no other reason than to not have to remove the manifolds and rick breaking the bolts. I am confident that I can drill and tap without damaging the head as this is a common occurrence in my job but who wants that aggravation? the reason for the longer pigtail is that in the 2.7L engine harness, you will find all 4 of the o2 connectors where in the 2.5 harness there are only connectors for the upstream o2's the downstream o2's connect to wires that locate up through the trunk and run into the white connector to the right of the ECM and from there go to the ECM. I plan on pulling the o2's and running a scope into the hole front and back to get a good idea of the condition of the catalyst material. You can get a very inexpensive camera that attached to your phone for about $25 from Aamzon.

You will have to change over the coolant temp sensor or swap connectors (which seems a lot harder as you would have to have a reliable wiring diagram and I have already found mistakes in the Bentley Manual). Again not too terribly expensive but it all adds up. About $40 on the high side.

I am changing the AOS, Water Pump, Thermostat, IMS bearing, and Rear Main Seal in the first round of parts. Second round will be spark plug tubes and seals, Spark plugs, I will need new intake gaskets, exhaust manifold to pipe gaskets and bolts, and a new Oil cooler. Figure these should run about $750 (round 1 and 2 combined). Not all of this is necessary but I could not choose which one I would want to do with the engine in the car should save a lot of time in the long run.

My particular car will need some interior work and well as removal of one scratch (with dent) in the rear quarter and a new top replaced before I will call it done. Hope to have it up and running in about 6 weeks. Keep watching and check out some of the videos at a You Tube Channel I just started tonight where I will post videos of the build.

Thanks for the update and I've subscribed. I've got to get this car back online and the only local 2.5l i've found has been sitting in junkyard car since 2015.

Porsche Boxster IMS bearing removal with home made tools Pt1

https://youtu.be/EPY5WLSxqOo

https://youtu.be/EPY5WLSxqOo

I’m not the best cameraman editor or speaker and occasionally I say things that are just completely wrong in these videos. I usually correct myself. But I do discuss a little bit more about the things necessary to complete the swap. I should have two more videos coming and then the IMS will be swapped out. One of the videos will go into pretty good detail of everything I had to change over Hopefully that will be out this weekend

Locking the cams down
 

IMS Bearing Removal Using Homemade Tools Pt2

https://youtu.be/aAsx1rOEcGM

Locking down cams.

Part 4

https://youtu.be/gn8JjcUZZKw

Dllrd23,

Where'd you end up with this? Didn't see any more videos or posts on it.

Summer and knee surgery happened but I’m back on it now. Have a few new videos posted and a couple more being edited as well as a pile or parts to put on. Stay tuned.

Part 5

https://youtu.be/I_7Est03XcA