I read where the 2.7 motor blows up for no real reason...

[MNBoxster]

Originally Posted by bmussatti

But Jim, how can you say this? You have not had any problems with your Boxster. Where's the annoyance?

Hi,

OK Guys, we can Wordsmith all night, but the potential issues with the Boxster are real and well-documented. I don't need to have the RMS drain 9 Qts. of Oil, and create a HazMat cleanup of my Garage floor ($3200 for my Buddy w/ the '04 'S' - PCNA had to pay it), before I'll admit to those potential failures. You can cover your ears and scream LA-LA-LA-LA-LA all you want, but it won't eliminate this very real potential.

Where's the annoyance? The fact that there is a very real (more real than any other car I've owned) possibility that the next turn of the ignition key could trigger disaster. Only a defective ignition switch can assure this doesn't happen (who'd have thought?)...

I would stand more easy were I bmusatti, because I would have the protective warranty blanket to keep me warm, but as a 2nd owner, I don't expect Porsche to raise a finger.

I've owned several Brit cars, and for the record, they don't leak, they just like to mark their territory... There were times in my MGB, or TR3 or Healey, and the like, where I might not have been surprised if the car didn't react at all when I turned the key, but I was reasonably assured that it wouldn't self-destruct either, at least more so than the Boxster.

The car does have it's good points to be sure, and for many these outweigh any of the not so good things. But, others feel differently. I wonder if this may be one reason these cars hold their value so poorly...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

[Brucelee]

I do have two questions for all of you though.... :

Does my Porsche warranty cover these failures?

Yes, a Porshce factory warranty should have you covered.

Are these flaws found in the Cayman as well?

As far as we know, yes they do!

BTW-for the record, I love driving and looking at the Box.

Just wish it were more reliable and less costly to repair.

[Grizzly]

Originally Posted by MNBoxster

Hi,

I've owned several Brit cars, and for the record, they don't leak, they just like to mark their territory...

C'mon now, Jim. If your British car isn't leaking, it's empty.


I wonder if this may be one reason these cars hold their value so poorly...

Now I didn't kill myself researching this but:

The 1998 Lotus Esprit's base price appears to have been $82,625. I just found a couple of examples for sale for $37,000 or thereabout. Its resale value appears to be roughly 45% of MSRP.

The 1998 Boxster appears to have had an MSRP of $40,745. Though KBB says its value is now $20,225, lets assume $18,500, a more realistic selling price for a nice '98. Let's see... that's...about... yup, 45% of MSRP.

I wonder how a more comparable 993 would have held up?

[Boxtaboy]

Originally Posted by Grizzly

Now I didn't kill myself researching this but:

The 1998 Lotus Esprit's base price appears to have been $82,625. I just found a couple of examples for sale for $37,000 or thereabout. Its resale value appears to be roughly 45% of MSRP.

The 1998 Boxster appears to have had an MSRP of $40,745. Though KBB says its value is now $20,225, lets assume $18,500, a more realistic selling price for a nice '98. Let's see... that's...about... yup, 45% of MSRP.

I wonder how a more comparable 993 would have held up?

You know what? While this is an interesting analysis, it really doesn't matter, cause you're not gonna change Minnesota Man's viewpoint of the car, and he's not going to change ours. He's going to continue to post the issue about his friend's 04 engine failure as an example to prove his point, and we're gonna continue to point at Boxsters that have had no issues at all. Different philosophies at the end of the day. I am with you 100% on your viewpoint of this whoe discussion, and personally, I expected to pay a little more to play when I bought the Porsche. Again, if I wanted 100% reliability, I would've bought a Honda or Toyota. I'm not expecting "value" in any sense of the word. I use my car only on weekends for pleasure, as I live in NYC, and I pay over $500 per month just to park my car in a massive underground parking garage. At that rate, I could change a new engine every 2 years from the parking rent costs alone. The point is, if all this stuff scares you to the point of it not making you enjoy the car anymore, then sell it. MN has every reason to move on to something different. Me personally, what I also love about a Porsche as compared to a Lotus or Ferrari is that if you do break down, you can actually find a Porsche dealer within a reasonable distance of wherever you are because there is a very good dealer service network built up here. Not so with a Lotus or Ferrari. To each his own.

YMMV and all that good stuff.

[z12358]

Grizzly, your writing reflects enlightnment and depth. I agree 100% with your last few posts here.

Boxtaboy, agree 100% with you, too.

Without getting philosophical, it is fair to say that no design is literally perfect. All cars have their "faults", and the more exotic (expensive) they get, the "faultier" they seem to become. Except in rare occasions, sport cars are not bought as investments. They are a cost item, a toy. It all boils down to whether the joy from the toy is worth the costs of acquiring it and keeping it. The buying public seems to like the equation, hence the prices are where they are. It's not Porsche's fault that it can charge so much for its cars and their maintenance. It can, so it does. Wouldn't anyone?

What Rich and Jim seem to be proposing here is that there is some kind of a conspiracy by Porsche and the media to keep the masses ignorant about some ugly truth about their design. I find that hard to believe. Every person I talk to on the track is aware of the RMS and every possible thing that can go wrong with their cars, and some of these people have had and raced Porsches for the last 20 years AND have a brand spanking new 997 or 987 on order! Somebody must be buying these new and used Porsches and it'd be pretty arrogant to call them all ignorant, uninformed, or just poseurs, I think.

Now once in a while, a guy WILL stretch to buy their dream sports car like a used Porsche, and underestimate the total cost of ownership by a little or a lot. Happens all the time with everything else in life. It's not Porsche's responsibility to lay down the calculations for them, nor to teach them that to truly enjoy a toy they have to leave a very comfortable cushion in their $ cost estimates.

Z.

[Brucelee]

I am not suggesting any conspiracy on Porsche's part. I simply think they should rectify a design that is faulty and that they know is faulty.

How much is that to ask of a company for a engine that is in cars costing $50-125K? If I was buying a POS Kia for $12K I have no expectation I have purchased a 250K motor. In this car, I would like to feel like the motor would be the last thing to go.

Seriously guys, read what I have been writing. I am a huge fan of the Boxster and I have never said that it should have the reliability of a Toyota.

But I do think that having your engine grenade on you because the boys in Germany are too cheap or proud is asking a bit much of the Porshce "faithful."

[denverpete]

I certainly don't think that there is a Porsche conspiracy - but it's definitely not out in the open for non-Porsche owners. The fact is that the RMS and the intermediate shaft designs are flawed and have been for some time. Period.

I guarantee that if I had checked out this site before buying my Boxster I would have either purchased new or gotten an extended warranty. Instead, I bought into the "Porsche engines are bullet proof" fallacy. So, within 28 days of ownership of a '99 with 12,240 miles I lost an engine while sitting at a stoplight. Sick to the stomach doesn't begin to describe how I felt when I found out how much it would cost to replace. Luckily for me I had a 90 day warranty and the dealer had to pick up the replacement costs.

I've been back and forth on this car. On most days I can't imagine not owning it or driving it. On other days (Engine failure, MAF, O2 Sensors, coolant problem, spoiler problem, broken center console, broken visor flappy thing, top problem) I just want to unload the damn thing.

I will say that if Porsche fixed just the RMS and intermediate shaft flaws for the 2008 versions - I'd be on the lot in a heartbeat picking out a new ride....

[Brucelee]

Originally Posted by denverpete

I certainly don't think that there is a Porsche conspiracy - but it's definitely not out in the open for non-Porsche owners. The fact is that the RMS and the intermediate shaft designs are flawed and have been for some time. Period.

I guarantee that if I had checked out this site before buying my Boxster I would have either purchased new or gotten an extended warranty. Instead, I bought into the "Porsche engines are bullet proof" fallacy. So, within 28 days of ownership of a '99 with 12,240 miles I lost an engine while sitting at a stoplight. Sick to the stomach doesn't begin to describe how I felt when I found out how much it would cost to replace. Luckily for me I had a 90 day warranty and the dealer had to pick up the replacement costs.

I've been back and forth on this car. On most days I can't imagine not owning it or driving it. On other days (Engine failure, MAF, O2 Sensors, coolant problem, spoiler problem, broken center console, broken visor flappy thing, top problem) I just want to unload the damn thing.

I will say that if Porsche fixed just the RMS and intermediate shaft flaws for the 2008 versions - I'd be on the lot in a heartbeat picking out a new ride....

Well said Pete. Having an engine go is sickening. My neighbor is still leery of her car. She keeps asking me "was that normal?"

[z12358]

"I certainly don't think that there is a Porsche conspiracy - but it's definitely not out in the open for non-Porsche owners."

Common sense suggests that both cannot be true:

1. Either there has been a real and eggregious fault design in Porsche's engines that somehow the media (magazines, forums, publications, TV, radio, consumer advocacy groups, etc. WORLDWIDE) have conveniently "forgotten" about over the last 20 years, and kept it from the buying public, hence a consipracy, OR

2. The fault is perhaps not as big as purported by some -- both in frequency and severity, relative to what's commonly acceptable in the auto industry. Of course, personal closeness to a defect would indeed amplify the negative feelings about the event, and add extra motivation to vent the frustration on a public forum. ("It's not statistics if it happens to you.") But that's far from an objective measure of a product's quality as a whole on a global scale. For objectivity we must go to the market where informed buyers vote with their wallets. Hence the prices paid for Porsches.

Actually, there's a third option that I found not worth mentioning, as it borders on being delusional: That there are only a handful of knowledgable people aware of the full extent of the problem while the media and the rest of the buying public are simply stupid and brainwashed enough to just keep buying and driving defective Porsches.

So which one is it?

Z.