05-24-2020, 11:56 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,135
|
Hey man i ended up doing a very similar exhaust design, but im finding it very loud and frankly doesnt sound good in my garage.
Do you have a better pic of yours and how does it sound?
|
|
|
05-25-2020, 09:57 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
Hey man i ended up doing a very similar exhaust design, but im finding it very loud and frankly doesnt sound good in my garage.
Do you have a better pic of yours and how does it sound?
|
Here's a close up of how I attached mine. I just the cat delete pipes and slid the 2" exhaust over them. It sounds great but its too loud for the street, I do have headers and no cats which doesn't help. I'm sure with the right mufflers it would be streatable.
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
05-25-2020, 10:04 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
While I'm waiting for hardware I decided to play around extending the roof line. I'll just move the plexiglass rear window to the aluminum, this will also allow me to ditch the roof cover which is surprisingly heavy

__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
06-08-2020, 05:49 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
I made it back from VIR with good news and bad news. The good news I didn't die... the homemade control arms and various other one off suspension changes didn't break. The bad news is it was slower... by 5 whole seconds. The first heat the car was incredibly loose, its now square (front track is equal to rear track) the front is 7 inches wider than stock and the rear is 4 inchs wider than stock so I expected this to be a big change. I stiffened the front sway bar several times through the day and ended up close to a balanced car. Its still on the narrow 235 series time trial tires so I'm going to wait for wider tires before I make any more adjustments. As it sits its still loose which resulted in a spin at Oak Tree but overall it has far more grip. If I took the widebody off (with its huge fender intakes) I'm sure the car would be faster, I'm loosing a lot of speed down the stretches. I'm now weighing engine swaps, the Audi W12 is an interesting option. Its the same length as the boxster motor and would bolt up to the Boxster S transmission.
Here's a couple shots from the weekend, it was a small social distancing event so the organizer let me and the buddies I run track days with try and recreate the Car and Driver Lightening Lap photo. Super fun weekend, it was great to get out there and bring back a working car.
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
06-09-2020, 06:16 AM
|
#5
|
2003 S, Arctic Silver, M6
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 1,346
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by truegearhead
The bad news is it was slower... by 5 whole seconds.]
|
But it LOOKS faster!
|
|
|
06-09-2020, 09:38 AM
|
#6
|
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,937
|
Best looking car in that group shot.
Can you get any sort of analysis of the airflow to see what is helping with grip and what is just creating extra drag? Maybe you could recruit an engineering student to do a CFD model - I'm thinking of the groups that do the $2000 challenge like Georgia Tech or similar.
Engine swaps can be enticing, but most of the cases I've seen, when they are done and all sorted out the cost/benefit is not much different than just going with a higher power Porsche engine. Maybe you should try cutting a deal with some jerk on the forum who keeps pushing his rebuilt engine at a highly inflated price.
I'd love to see your car with the W12 sorted out in it.
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
|
|
|
06-09-2020, 01:30 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350
Best looking car in that group shot.
Can you get any sort of analysis of the airflow to see what is helping with grip and what is just creating extra drag? Maybe you could recruit an engineering student to do a CFD model - I'm thinking of the groups that do the $2000 challenge like Georgia Tech or similar.
Engine swaps can be enticing, but most of the cases I've seen, when they are done and all sorted out the cost/benefit is not much different than just going with a higher power Porsche engine. Maybe you should try cutting a deal with some jerk on the forum who keeps pushing his rebuilt engine at a highly inflated price.
I'd love to see your car with the W12 sorted out in it.
|
I've done a few engine swaps and ya, they never go well. The 3.4L 911 motors are starting to get cheap but I'm really looking for more power. If there was a cost effective Porsche solution I'd go for it. That being said I also really like the challenge of something odd like a W12, building the car is half the fun for me.
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
06-09-2020, 01:38 PM
|
#8
|
On the slippery slope
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin and Palm Springs
Posts: 3,798
|
All the new aero could be having a big impact.
Without wind tunnel or CFD modeling, you really don't know if it is good or bad.
Does look really cool however
__________________
2004 Boxster S 6 speed - DRL relay hack, Polaris AutoTop DIY
2004 996 Targa Tip
Instructor - San Diego region
2014 Porsche Performance Driving School
2020 BMW X3, 2013 Ram 1500, 2016 Cmax, 2004 F-150 "Big Red"
|
|
|
06-09-2020, 08:28 PM
|
#9
|
Racer Boy
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 946
|
At the next track day take the splitter and wing off and see the change in lap times. Also note your top speed compared to the later/previous session with the aero stuff back on.
Do you know what the top speed difference is between before and now?
Just looking at the picture, I'd say you have added a lot of surface drag; the flares and possibly the new radiator duct layout, besides the front splitter and the wing may be killing your straightaway speed enough that the increased downforce (hard to say how much increase) doesn't make up the difference.
Another thing to ponder is the air intake for the engine. It's on the back window, correct? That is in a really low-pressure area, so that may be hurting horsepower, which isn't going to help.
|
|
|
07-02-2020, 10:16 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Boy
At the next track day take the splitter and wing off and see the change in lap times. Also note your top speed compared to the later/previous session with the aero stuff back on.
Do you know what the top speed difference is between before and now?
Just looking at the picture, I'd say you have added a lot of surface drag; the flares and possibly the new radiator duct layout, besides the front splitter and the wing may be killing your straightaway speed enough that the increased downforce (hard to say how much increase) doesn't make up the difference.
Another thing to ponder is the air intake for the engine. It's on the back window, correct? That is in a really low-pressure area, so that may be hurting horsepower, which isn't going to help.
|
The flares are the problem, the wing and splitter have been tested on and off, they're worth almost 3 seconds at VIR. I need to have more power, thats the only solution. Especially now that I have these absurd 12" wide rear wheels on the car
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
07-02-2020, 12:56 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,144
|
Nice, those are some nice looking wheels, what tires are you going to run on them? What is the widest 17" you can get?
|
|
|
07-02-2020, 05:45 PM
|
#12
|
2003 S, Arctic Silver, M6
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 1,346
|
Are those wheels or beer kegs?
|
|
|
07-03-2020, 02:56 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steved0x
Nice, those are some nice looking wheels, what tires are you going to run on them? What is the widest 17" you can get?
|
Thanks, I’m putting on 315/35/17 Hoosiers today, and 245s in the front. Same setup I have on my 911, I’ll eventually need a wider front tire
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
07-08-2020, 06:56 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by truegearhead
Thanks, I’m putting on 315/35/17 Hoosiers today, and 245s in the front. Same setup I have on my 911, I’ll eventually need a wider front tire
|
That's a monster tire! I bet that is going to feel good!
|
|
|
09-28-2020, 02:36 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
07-03-2020, 01:56 PM
|
#16
|
On the slippery slope
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin and Palm Springs
Posts: 3,798
|
Its a very slippery slope
__________________
2004 Boxster S 6 speed - DRL relay hack, Polaris AutoTop DIY
2004 996 Targa Tip
Instructor - San Diego region
2014 Porsche Performance Driving School
2020 BMW X3, 2013 Ram 1500, 2016 Cmax, 2004 F-150 "Big Red"
|
|
|
07-03-2020, 02:50 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG
Its a very slippery slope
|
It is, and you never get to the bottom. For example I bought an Audi V8 for it today...
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 06:04 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Out with the old. Anyone need a 2.7? The Audi V8 arrives Friday (I think), 8 weeks or so until tools down and baby arrives.
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
09-28-2020, 06:47 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,135
|
You got some nuts man...no one can argue that
|
|
|
10-04-2020, 03:33 AM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
|
Parts for the turbo build have started flowing and I’ve started the mock up. Here’s one of the two side intercooler radiators (the water cooling rad).
Air will enter here
And exit here (the gap between the outer fender and tail light
I’m a little bummed about the weight, they’re probably 25lbs a piece. I’ll have close to 100lbs in my intercooler system including the water. All in all I’m probably adding 200-250lbs to the car in engine, turbos and cooling, so far I’ve found about 40lbs in steel that I was able to remove. Hopefully I can find some more. I still need to remove the HVAC system under the dash, anyone know what that weighs?
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 AM.
| |