Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2017, 07:12 PM   #21
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by geetee View Post
^^ sure
Can you elaborate more?

__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 02:39 AM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 9
I just purchased 12mm & 20mm hubcentric spacers
I think the tires I will run are 235/35R19 and 275/30R19
Acast94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 09:54 AM   #23
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acast94 View Post
I just purchased 12mm & 20mm hubcentric spacers
I think the tires I will run are 235/35R19 and 275/30R19
Did you get the correct length lug bolts also?
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 10:26 AM   #24
Registered User
 
Nine8Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Montreal, QC. (currently expat to Shanghai)
Posts: 3,249
If you can get the rear tire in the 265 I'd say go for that instead. Those 19"x10 will be heavy for that little flat 6, Porsche wheels or not. If you can find any ways to save weight on the rear wheels, do it.

Not that it would make a huge difference compared with the 275, but it will sure help a bit
__________________
______________________________
'97 Boxster base model 2.5L, Guards Red/Tan leather, with a new but old Alpine am/fm radio.
Nine8Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 10:59 AM   #25
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine8Six View Post
If you can get the rear tire in the 265 I'd say go for that instead. Those 19"x10 will be heavy for that little flat 6, Porsche wheels or not. If you can find any ways to save weight on the rear wheels, do it.

Not that it would make a huge difference compared with the 275, but it will sure help a bit
That makes a big change in the driving characteristics. Takes away the near identical ration speed between the front and rear tires, less sidewall on the 265, which would ride rougher and possibly make the car feel not near as planted in the rear while cornering and hitting bumps. Just doesn't seem worth it to me to give up better handling for a little weight saving in the tire. Like I said before, plenty of ways to add power then to give up the better handling. These cars were not rocket ships in the first place. If you want that, do some mods!
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 11:37 AM   #26
Registered User
 
Nine8Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Montreal, QC. (currently expat to Shanghai)
Posts: 3,249
I see, was just trying to save our friend here 1~2kg on the rear end. Dunno about handling... my forged ADV6 (V1 SL Series) are lighter than the stock wheels that came with that car. So light I can do wheelies when passing over speed bumps.

Grip, ah that. the trick is to find the cheapest possible tires you can find(in China!) and warm them up real good before hitting it. The rubber "melts" basically: Velcro-mode-ON! Excellent for the dusty Shanghai industrial Park, early Sunday morning, 0400am, cops & kids sleeping....

Is that what you meant by driving characteristic?
__________________
______________________________
'97 Boxster base model 2.5L, Guards Red/Tan leather, with a new but old Alpine am/fm radio.
Nine8Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 11:42 AM   #27
On the slippery slope
 
JayG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin and Palm Springs
Posts: 3,794
Garage
If you don't have PSM, why would the rotational speed of the front vs rear matter?
__________________
2004 Boxster S 6 speed - DRL relay hack, Polaris AutoTop DIY
2004 996 Targa Tip
Instructor - San Diego region
2014 Porsche Performance Driving School
2020 BMW X3, 2013 Ram 1500, 2016 Cmax, 2004 F-150 "Big Red"
JayG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 12:48 PM   #28
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG View Post
If you don't have PSM, why would the rotational speed of the front vs rear matter?
If your front tires are rotating at a different speed then the rear, you will get a unbalanced feeling when turning. I can feel it when I go from my summer tires to my winter tires. On my winter tires the front and rear tires spin at much different speeds and steering input needed is way more then I like. It just doesn't feel as stable and balanced with you constantly having more input into the steering wheel. My front winter and summer tires rotate at the same speed (so I am used to the rotation speed of the front tires) the summer and winter rear tires do not rotate at the same speed. With my summer tires rotating at near identical speeds (1km per rotation difference in rotation speed) the unbalanced feeling is gone and rolling thru corners is a breeze with less input needed to the steering wheel. Completely different feeling of security while cornering. I can even feel this when changing lanes on the highway, just not a good balanced feeling to me.

That's my personal experience and I will always try to get the front and rear tires spinning at the closest speeds possible.
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 01:45 PM   #29
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine8Six View Post
I see, was just trying to save our friend here 1~2kg on the rear end. Dunno about handling... my forged ADV6 (V1 SL Series) are lighter than the stock wheels that came with that car. So light I can do wheelies when passing over speed bumps.

Grip, ah that. the trick is to find the cheapest possible tires you can find(in China!) and warm them up real good before hitting it. The rubber "melts" basically: Velcro-mode-ON! Excellent for the dusty Shanghai industrial Park, early Sunday morning, 0400am, cops & kids sleeping....

Is that what you meant by driving characteristic?
I think the weight difference actually depends on the tire manufacture and performance series.

Looking at General Tires G-MAX AS-03 tire, Tirerack shows the 265 weighs 1 lbs less then the 275, but their 275 weighs only 24 lbs. Click on specs.

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=General&tireModel=G-MAX+AS-03&frontTire=63WR9GMAS03XL&rearTire=73WR9GMAS03XL&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes

Looking at Sumitomo HTR Z III tires, Tirerack shows the 265 weighs 1 lbs more then the 275 series. Click on specs.

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Sumitomo&tireModel=HTR+Z+III&frontTire=63YR9HTRZ3&rearTire=73YR9HTRZ3XL&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes

Looking at Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, Tirerack shows the 265 weighs 1 lbs more then the 275 series. Click on specs.

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Goodyear&tireModel=Eagle+F1+Asymmetric+2&frontTire=63YR9F1A2XL&rearTire=73YR9F1A2XL&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes

Looking at Yokohama S.DRIVE tires, Tirerack shows both tires weigh the same at 26 lbs each. Click on specs.

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Yokohama&tireModel=S.drive&frontTire=63YR9SXL&rearTire=73YR9SXL&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes

Looking at Continental EXTREMECONTACT DW tires, Tirerack shows the 275 weighs 3 lbs more then the 265 series. Click on specs.

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Continental&tireModel=ExtremeContact+DW&frontTire=63YR9ECDWXL&rearTire=73YR9ECDWXL&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes

Is Tirerack correct on the weights?


.
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |

Last edited by KRAM36; 02-19-2017 at 02:13 PM.
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 01:45 PM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stow, MA
Posts: 918
Garage
Your brake bias will also change resulting in diminished braking performance. The smaller diameter wheels will tend to lock up before the larger diameter ones.

__________________
2004 Boxster S Silver - FUNTOY
2002 Boxster Base Guardsy Red - FUNBOX
1987 Caterham Super 7 1700 Supersprint
2009 Mercedes Benz CLK 350 convertible
1941 Dodge Luxury Liner Coupe
Anker is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page