![]() |
well.......
..........metal in the oil is never a good thing.
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1466902524.jpg |
In several of your posts you're asking very basic informational questions about IMS replacements that a novice would ask. In other posts you're crapping all over the people who developed the most successful IMS replacement on the market as if your an IMS expert. Can't be both - IMS novice and expert
|
It's interesting how volatile this subject has become. Most shops use the LN IMSB kit and have had great success. Not everyone can send their car to "Mr. Tennis elbow" (got that patting himself on his own back) Many of his "accomplishments" have come from another shop's idea's. For the longest time he touted Type IV engines as being the "only" engine. At the same time he wouldn't even say "Subaru" and now look at what he's doing, "building Subaru" engines and he says his are superior. Hell, FAT performance in Orange CA and Outfront Motorsports are premier builders, FAT for the Type IV and Type 1 and Outfront for the 4 and 6 cyl. Subaru engines. The bottom line is Jake is good but not the "legend in his own mind" that the thinks he is.
Now along with that said, I just had a LN IMSB installed on my car (double row) the car had 62,000 miles and the original double row was in good shape but I had it done just "because" It's expensive but no where near the cost of shipping a car to Georgia, paying Jakes labor and elevated parts prices. In another 6 or 7 years years when the clutch is toast, I'll have another LN IMSB kit installed and still be money ahead had I shipped my car to Raby. |
Hi,
ISMB: it's a (big) business. Another ball bearing vs. roller bearing aspect: roller bearing: higher friction; higher inner temperature That is why you won't find roller bearings for high rev applications. Forces: shure there are all kinds of forces, because the IMS also transmits forces from one side to the other and it's not a static system because you accelerate and decelerate.: http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarti...mall/pic06.jpg http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-...ate_shaft3.jpg http://www.einmaligparts.com/assets/...on/pg_0013.jpg Regards, Markus |
In all honesty I know nothing about the shaft, the one designed by Porsche anyway, and until today have avoided opening/reading "any" thread/forums debating on that subject. My Bearing is the best-in-the-world (20 years old now!).
However when I saw "roller" bearing as the title something told me that the IMSB business was obviously going out of control. Rollers bearings aren't necessarily a synonym of "performance" (e.g. think slow locomotive drive train applications). That's possibly why this particular thread caught my attention and raised curiosity. You are correct Markus. You have more physics involved on rotating mass than one can imagine. Kinetic energy/velocity, momentum, gravity, floating design (or not), centrifugal force (although anything spinning <8000rpm doesn't really create a whole lot of that), dynamic energy e.g. during accel & decel of the balls/rollers. Did I forgot friction and thermal expansion?! Tolerances?! You call this "dynamic" Markus. Personally (and my m.eng professor would agree) I call this an every engineers' nightmare ;) |
Although, I could be wrong, that might possibly be what the MY96 needs long term. A good old tech, fat & heavy duty roller bearing. Who knows for sure
(like I said earlier, without the CAE data and engine room test results, it's all based on luck lolll) |
Quote:
I think Raby charges one heck of a premium. But, that's his business and he can do it. If you've got a guy that knows how to install the bearing and charges less, good for you, feel free to share his info if he's quality. The point there is he isn't going to be putting a roller bearing in your engine because he also knows the LN bearing the best and most used one out there in this application. Now back to SilverSSS slinging insults while that metal continues tearing his car up. |
jdraupp: 3rd post, first page
|
Quote:
|
Took car out today, engine still didn't blow up. Did i do something wrong?
|
Quote:
Carnage stuff, barely can look |
Yeah.. .. .
|
Quote:
Whatever chunked in yours doesn't seem to affect the running of the car. Clearly. Up to you if you want to sponsor a local shop for cleaning then by all means - pay!. Most here at the SH club couldn't care less and wait until the engine blows up man - shall it really happen engines/replacement are easy to find. Its just a car, and they do just that; blow up eventually. In a meantime drive the thing and have fun. Red line and all bud |
Quote:
Do NOT confuse my patented (US Patent 8,992,089 B2) IMS Solution with some other "oil feed" product. It shares nothing in common with those. Pre- Qualification procedures originated here. Thats why of the IMS Retrofits that we have carried out under this roof (over 600 to date) not a single one has failed. Assuming that an engine is healthy, or retrofitting the IMSB on an engine that is known to have debris laden oil, makes zero sense. If you compare what we actually do, to those who just install an IMSB, then you'll see where the value is. I maintain a 6 month backlog on IMS Retrofits, so we must be doing something right. That said, the RS Roller Bearing is NOT an LN Engineering product. It is offered by RND Engines directly to SSF Auto Parts, exclusively. |
RE the roller bearing, again, very strange. Personally I've never realized how much hate there was for what appears to be a little shaft. Pretty inoffensive looking shaft if I may add.
Sure Philip Vaughan would agree, if he'd be alive of course. You get the point OP (Chris) - not sure if this all answers your question. For me I've reached the 'whatever' zone already. Thank you very much and have an amazing day! |
After the theoretical debates with their lack of quantification and test data are over - there has been some field experience reported with Roller Bearing IMSB's.
To my surprise it has been positive so far. Only a few reports so far and IIRC only 10,000 miles. Of course that little data point should be balanced against the experience with deep-groove ball bearing IMSB and the famous plain bearing alternative. Considering the amount of work+ collateral damage from any IMSB failure, I am surprised people take any risks. |
censured: none of my business really.
(wish my boxster and everyone's long and healthy imsb life) |
removed that as well, wt... way too bored obviously
|
Quote:
If you install an IMSB by pulling it out of an engine and press a new one in you always have a risk, especially if you don't know what you are doing there and on all these videos it looks so damn easy. And sometimes the IMS and crankshaft bearings fail just because of the two engine half casing tolerances. So if you don't like risks… buy another car… ;) Regards, Markus |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website