Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2016, 04:53 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bastrop, Tx
Posts: 2,643
3.4 engine swap Q&A

I'm very close to installing a 2001 3.4 into my 2000 Boxster S and I think I mostly comprehend what I need to do. I have the "101 project for your Porsche Boxster" book and I've also been surfing the internet on other engine swaps. I've got a few questions for those who might know.
1) What flywheel/clutch do I use? The 3.4 had a really good clutch on it and I'm hoping to reuse it.
2) I have the cluster, immobilizer and DME from the 996 cab. Besides running another wire to the cluster for the oil pressure gauge, it's just plug and play right?(using the 3.2 engine harness). There shouldn't be any reason for getting the 996 DME reprogrammed. The 3.4 DME will still think it's in a 996 cab?
3)I have a 987 aluminum engine cover. I won't need to lower the motor any to clear the 996 intake?
4)Is there a verdict on which fuel rail is better/easier? 3.2 or 3.4?

Thanks Woody

__________________
Woody
itsnotanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 01:28 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SE Ma
Posts: 261
Hi Woody I can shed some light on lowering the engine at the front. On my conversion the passenger side intake runner hits the opening (access hole) not the lid. It required four 3/4" spacers on the front mount. YMMV
Deadeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 03:46 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 150
I think the Boxster S uses the same clutch disc as a 996 but the flywheel and pressure plate are different., so I expect you can use the 996 clutch flywheel complete
johnsjmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 10:51 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsnotanova View Post
1) What flywheel/clutch do I use? The 3.4 had a really good clutch on it and I'm hoping to reuse it.
This is dependent on which transmission you use. I foolishly ordered a 996 clutch but was using the 5 speed trans from my 99 Boxster. The teeth didn't line up so I had buy a regular 986 clutch which to my knowledge are fine to use with the increased power of the 3.4.
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsnotanova View Post
2) I have the cluster, immobilizer and DME from the 996 cab. Besides running another wire to the cluster for the oil pressure gauge, it's just plug and play right?(using the 3.2 engine harness). There shouldn't be any reason for getting the 996 DME reprogrammed. The 3.4 DME will still think it's in a 996 cab?
I don't believe you'll need to reprogram the DME. I'm not sure about your MY but with my 99 harness I also had to route wires for the resonance flap in the intake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsnotanova View Post
3)I have a 987 aluminum engine cover. I won't need to lower the motor any to clear the 996 intake?
I also bought a 987 engine cover. However the intake was making contact with the car and not the engine cover. I had to use a couple inches of spacers on the front engine mount. Try to lower the engine as little as is necessary because the engine lowers your ground clearance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsnotanova View Post
4)Is there a verdict on which fuel rail is better/easier? 3.2 or 3.4?
I used the original rails because the 99 Boxster has a return fuel system, but the 99 996 did not. Your MY will be different than mine so you'll have to decide which one to use.

You've probably already seen it, but this pelican article was the most helpful resource I came across.
Porsche Boxster Engine Conversion Project - 986 / 987 (1997-08) - Pelican Parts Technical Article
__________________
99 3.4L

Last edited by soccerties; 03-12-2016 at 11:14 AM.
soccerties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 11:12 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 41
Also I would recommend using a 987 intake if you can. Gives much more air to breath, bolts right in and only requires a simple modification to the intake. And do it before you put the engine in to save some knuckle skin.

987 v 986 Air box
__________________
99 3.4L
soccerties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 04:13 PM   #6
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsnotanova View Post
I'm very close to installing a 2001 3.4 into my 2000 Boxster S and I think I mostly comprehend what I need to do. I have the "101 project for your Porsche Boxster" book and I've also been surfing the internet on other engine swaps. I've got a few questions for those who might know.
1) What flywheel/clutch do I use? The 3.4 had a really good clutch on it and I'm hoping to reuse it.
2) I have the cluster, immobilizer and DME from the 996 cab. Besides running another wire to the cluster for the oil pressure gauge, it's just plug and play right?(using the 3.2 engine harness). There shouldn't be any reason for getting the 996 DME reprogrammed. The 3.4 DME will still think it's in a 996 cab?
3)I have a 987 aluminum engine cover. I won't need to lower the motor any to clear the 996 intake?
4)Is there a verdict on which fuel rail is better/easier? 3.2 or 3.4?

Thanks Woody
You should be able to use either Flywheel because both engines use the same crank, you have to use the Box 6-speed so you need a Box clutch if it's different from the 3.4.
Clusters changed in 2001 so I don't know what you have to do there, I would not change that until the engine is running.
Keep your OE DME it is the same as the 2001 just programed with 996 map. Engine will run fine unless you install the 987 airbox & bigger MAF tube of the 987. If you keep the bigger MAF you need to install the 996 DME program.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 04:25 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bastrop, Tx
Posts: 2,643
Thanks guys! I saw a thread where someone was saying that all you need is the 987 cover and you don't need to lower the motor. I'm glad you both spoke up and let me know. Thanks again. Just a thought. Do you guys think you could hammer the metal where it hits far enough to clear or is spacers the only answer? I sure like the bottom of the motor higher.
I eventually want to get a light weight flywheel but it looks like I'll just buy a new clutch disc for the 3.4 clutch for now.
I have a 987 air box and an aftermarket intake I got from a member. I need to research on which is better.
__________________
Woody
itsnotanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 06:05 PM   #8
Registered User
 
golonaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: chi-town
Posts: 328
Garage
Not.
Mine fits with no spacers.
987s engine cover
__________________
99' with 3.4l engine. ROW tune. SAI delete
golonaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 06:08 PM   #9
Registered User
 
golonaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: chi-town
Posts: 328
Garage
Possibly me
no spacers here
__________________
99' with 3.4l engine. ROW tune. SAI delete
golonaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 11:21 AM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by golonaus View Post
Possibly me
no spacers here
You have a 99 correct? Did you lower the trans end or leave it? Are you using a 6 speed? I don't understand how you're not hitting the body without spacers.
soccerties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 11:41 AM   #11
Porsche "Purist"
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
Garage
A 3.4 DME will have to be programmed to work with your immobilizer, and to enter your vehicle's VIN. The VIN is a problem during emissions testing when the tester sees a different VIN than your car's tag.

If you use the 3.4 DME and immobilizer, your key fobs will have to be replaced (unless you have the codes).
__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.

Last edited by Paul; 03-13-2016 at 11:46 AM.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 11:54 AM   #12
Porsche "Purist"
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by soccerties View Post
This is dependent on which transmission you use. I foolishly ordered a 996 clutch but was using the 5 speed trans from my 99 Boxster. The teeth didn't line up so I had buy a regular 986 clutch which to my knowledge are fine to use with the increased power of the 3.4.
I have about 30000 miles on my 3.6 with the 2.5 5 speed clutch and tranny, no issues.
__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 05:51 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bastrop, Tx
Posts: 2,643
I was at COTA today and ran into Brad Roberts. He's a car chief for one of the Cayman GT4's racing there and use to be big in the boxster scene. He's done a few swaps and said that because I'm using a 6 speed I shouldn't have any problem using the 3.4 clutch and flywheel. He also said that the 987 engine cover isn't normally enough to clear and I would either have to lower the motor a little bit or make some clearance in the sheet metal. He suggested I use the 987 airbox and that the dme, immobilizer, cluster, locks and keys from the 996 should work fine. Thanks for all your imputes.
__________________
Woody
itsnotanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 09:04 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 41
Sounds like you've got a good plan together. It's a great feeling firing up the new engine for the first time. Enjoy!
soccerties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 12:50 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SE Ma
Posts: 261
Woody, you might look into swapping the 996 intake manifolds (you have to remove & flip them anyway) with either a 987 3.4 or 3.2 986 intake runners. It is the intake runner on the passengers side that will hit the chassis.
Deadeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 11:08 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bastrop, Tx
Posts: 2,643
I ran into a snag today. I'm using a 3.2 wiring harness and the coolant temp sensor wiring only uses two wires. The 3.4 coolant temp sensor uses 4. It looks like I can use the 3.2 temp sensor but how will that affect the 3.4 DME?
__________________
Woody
itsnotanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 04:01 PM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bastrop, Tx
Posts: 2,643
Just got a call from a friend who says that he has used a 996 DME on a 3.2 that had the 2 prong sensor and he had no issues.
__________________
Woody
itsnotanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 06:15 PM   #18
Reebuck1
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Georgetown, SC
Posts: 210
Garage
Woody, I used the two wire sender on my 996 3.4 swap with my 1998 DME and it worked just fine. I used the 996 analog gauges from the 996 but kept the digital gauges from my original 986 and the analog temp. gauge worked OK.
Reebuck1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 07:24 PM   #19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bastrop, Tx
Posts: 2,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reebuck1 View Post
Woody, I used the two wire sender on my 996 3.4 swap with my 1998 DME and it worked just fine. I used the 996 analog gauges from the 996 but kept the digital gauges from my original 986 and the analog temp. gauge worked OK.
Thanks! It's good to hear another person confirming what my friend said. Makes me wonder what the other wires are for? I have 2 2.5's in my shop, and both had the 4 prong sender like the 3.4. I also have a few 3.2 wire harnesses, and they all had the 2 prong

__________________
Woody
itsnotanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page