Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-21-2015, 08:16 PM   #7
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
No way those are the same oils that were tested. Something got mixed up somewhere, guaranteed as the results have a ton of differential in them.

The CAT tests looks to be the one thats off, because no way in hell does M1 0-40 have 1250 PPM Zn! The 1060 number that Blackstone has is spot on for that oil. Please don't think I am bragging about Blackstone, because I certainly am not.

Of course the Blackstone is easier to read, because they tell you a bunch of crap to make you feel better. Its all unicorns and rainbows.

That said, we don't use CAT only, I use CAT when I want to see particulate counts, or when I know an engine has wear and I want to grade that wear. ALS is the stand by for typical UOA thats non- developmental.

I would bring this up to CAT, it sounds like they gave you someone else's results.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page