Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2015, 03:41 AM   #1
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAM36 View Post
How can a chassis dyno machine know the drive train loss on a car?
you can add a correction factor into a dyno; someone could have easily modified those dyno results with a 1.15 or 1.2 correction factor so that it was reading high. as was previously stated, the only real information you can get from a dyno is change in hp, not absolute numbers. and in all the tuning i have seen of boxsters, i have yet to see anyone bolt on a 50 hp increase. i have seen people brag of 300 hp, but no 50 hp increase. that's why everyone always wants before and after numbers, because absolute numbers mean nothing when it comes to dynos.
The Radium King is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 11:02 AM   #2
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
So if Jake Raby is seeing a 4% swing on manuals, how is a chassis dyno machine going to know how to accurately calculate drive train loss?
The dynos that show flywheel HP gathered at the rear wheels have always been a joke to me. The drivetrain losses are calculated through a wizard thats no where near accurate for the drivetrain of a Porsche. On top of that, the ones I've seen before allow the user to put what ever figure they want in for a drivetrain loss and the software moves the curve. Its a real good way to cheat.

Numbers gathered at the rear wheels should always be just that. They should not be converted to some wild guess drivetrain loss correction.

If you want flywheel HP numbers, gain those from an engine dyno.

The quickest way to slow a car down is to use a dyno to gather the wrong data, for the wrong reasons.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist

Last edited by Jake Raby; 05-06-2015 at 11:05 AM.
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page