Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2013, 04:00 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Boxster Gear Ratios

i have seen a lot of questions / comments lately about gear ratios. for reference, here they are. lots of people mention the difference in gears 3-5 on the 2.5L vs. the 2.7L.

the reality is that because the final drives are different, the effective ratio for EVERY gear is different. in fact, the differences are more prominant in the LOWER gears. 1st, 2nd and 3rd are 8.5% shorter on the 2.5L while 4th and 5th are only 3% shorter.


2.5L / 2.7L




3.2L (6 speed)



__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 05:41 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Joe B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
Thanks for the info. I always wondered what the difference in ratios was between the 6 speed I bought and a 5 speed. I like the fact that the 6 speed ratios are lower (higher numerically).
Joe B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 05:54 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe B View Post
Thanks for the info. I always wondered what the difference in ratios was between the 6 speed I bought and a 5 speed. I like the fact that the 6 speed ratios are lower (higher numerically).
actually, they're not. you have to consider the final drive. the 6-speed FD is 3.44. the 2.5L is 3.889 and the 2.7L is 3.555. you need to multiply each geary by this number to get an EFFECTIVE gear ratio.

the truth is, the 2.5L has is geared lower than either of the others by a pretty substantial amount. the 2.7L, IMO, is the LEAST desirable. next is the 6-speed. the 2.5L 5-speed has the most useful ratios from a performance perspective.

__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 05:57 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Joe B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
Oh, right . Well at least 4th and 5th are lower, gears that I use a lot.
Joe B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 09:07 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tejas/NorCal
Posts: 201
Any idea how difficult it is to swap out only the final drive on a G86.01?

I'm already swapping in the early diff cover to install a Guard LSD, so if it's not much additional work, I might as well add in the extra 8.5% advantage (although I do already have trouble keeping the power to the ground in auto-x).
__________________
2001 Lapis Blue Boxster S Tip (stock), 2001 Guards Red Boxster 5-speed (not very stock)
tightbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 09:42 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
you have to change the ring gear & pinion. not that easy. you can pick up a G86.00 for $600. i would do that & sell your G86.01. should be close to a zero sum. then put the guard in the 00 box.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2020, 10:03 AM   #7
2006 987
 
986_inquiry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: st. louis
Posts: 443
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite View Post
actually, they're not. you have to consider the final drive. the 6-speed FD is 3.44. the 2.5L is 3.889 and the 2.7L is 3.555. you need to multiply each geary by this number to get an EFFECTIVE gear ratio.

the truth is, the 2.5L has is geared lower than either of the others by a pretty substantial amount. the 2.7L, IMO, is the LEAST desirable. next is the 6-speed. the 2.5L 5-speed has the most useful ratios from a performance perspective.

I was wondering why the 2.5 feels faster than the 2.7 despite the 2.7 having 10% more hp and 5% more torque. Gear ratio explains it.
__________________
2006 987 2.7 manual silver/black, PASM, OEM drilled rotors, heated seats
1998 986 2.5 manual black/tan with bad engine = SOLD
986_inquiry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2020, 12:21 PM   #8
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 986_inquiry View Post
I was wondering why the 2.5 feels faster than the 2.7 despite the 2.7 having 10% more hp and 5% more torque. Gear ratio explains it.
Thanks for searching, & Go Cardinal's!

__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page