Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2013, 11:06 AM   #21
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,121
i thought knock sensors were piezo, ie, they actually listen for a knock sound which will trigger them ... ?

The Radium King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 12:47 PM   #22
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
I had heard of instances where the LWFW can be made to work if you tore the engine down and balanced the crankshaft with the intended fly wheel. I am not sure how you would account for all harmonics this way. Was not aware that the knock sensor used crank speed....wow

Way back when I first got my S, I was I interested in a LWFW to reduce the huge cantilever load on the crankshaft....being worried about the RMS and crank carrier loads ....live and learn
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 12:48 PM   #23
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post
i thought knock sensors were piezo, ie, they actually listen for a knock sound which will trigger them ... ?
They detect excessive vibration which is why stiffer than stock mounts can be interpreted as detonation also.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 01:37 PM   #24
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,121
sound = vibration. i can't help but think ecu's are sophisticated enough to figure all that out, otherwise that death metal i'm always playing would be messing with my timing. i'm no expert on this, but a quick google tells me that the ecu reads two signals - average and peak, and only declares knock when the difference between the two exceeds a certain threshold in order to ensure that it isn't reacting to background noise. they are also frequency specific; ie. designed to 'hear' knock specifically and not just any bang or rattle. so, you would have to overcome at least two checks before a lightweight flywheel or bad engine mount will read as knock.

further, the guys who would notice the effects of pulled timing the most - cup cars, etc., are all running factory GT3 RS lightweight flywheels and, while i am sure they have go-fast ecu maps, i doubt they run different/more advanced knock protocols.
The Radium King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 11:09 PM   #25
Boxster Abuser
 
Eric523's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 199
AASCO and Tilton! Kidding of course but this is a custom option from AASCO for the Boxster S.




Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post
further, the guys who would notice the effects of pulled timing the most - cup cars, etc., are all running factory GT3 RS lightweight flywheels and, while i am sure they have go-fast ecu maps, i doubt they run different/more advanced knock protocols.
I do actually have a different ECU and knock control on the car the Tilton is on. It also has semi-solid trans and engine mounts and data logs on knock readings that don't seem to be a problem. However, I ran the Boxster spec AASCO flywheel and clutch package just like the dozens of other cars on track every weekend with stock ECUs. At least we could all be ignorant and easy to beat together and enjoy the same koolaid afterwards.

Either way, I just got myself a Boxster for every day driving and the first time the trans is pulled the Spec clutch package will go in. If for nothing else, the car is more enjoyable to drive with quicker rev matching. People enjoy driving and their cars for different reasons so the right answer may not be the same for everyone...
__________________
4.0L Dry Sump Boxster GT race car - HRG #23
2005 Cayenne S - DD

Last edited by Eric523; 01-07-2013 at 11:15 PM.
Eric523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 09:35 AM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 658
As a somewhat non-related data point. I was told to worry about all the things that are being discussed in the thread when I chose to install a solid flywheel in my GF's MCS. While not a light weight unit per say, it is not as heavy as the stock DMF. I guess that I was luck as none of the horror that was predicted came to pass... It works beautifully. I only have about 10K on the install, but so far so good...

shadrach74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page