Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2012, 04:50 PM   #1
jakesbox
 
trimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 759
Cold air intake

Does a cold air intake do anything to mess up the ecu settings or has anyone had any issues throwing cels with one installed...becuase of the intake?

Just curious...

trimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 05:35 PM   #2
Registered User
 
JAAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
Your stock is the best you can get or a 987 box. But to answer your question. It should be fine.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
JAAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 06:44 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 658
This mod I've never understood in this particular application. It seems to me that the stock intake is a cold air intake.

The other thing that I've never really understood is the desnorkal...it seems that is a conversion to a hot air intake...
shadrach74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 04:13 AM   #4
jakesbox
 
trimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 759
Ive just heard a lot about them...so I was more curious. I can not imagine spending $600+ for a cold air intake for what they say is 3-4 more horsepwoer. Again - just more curious than anything...
trimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 04:29 AM   #5
Registered User
 
JAAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
Especially in you climate stock is best. You can upgrade your intake piping but leave the stock box. Pedrosgarage.com has a good method to do this.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
JAAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:03 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by trimer View Post
Ive just heard a lot about them...so I was more curious. I can not imagine spending $600+ for a cold air intake for what they say is 3-4 more horsepwoer. Again - just more curious than anything...
First off, the intakes range between $300-$400 not $600. They do seem to be less restrictive than the oem set-up, and the "bark" that they produce at various rpm's is nothing short of ripping ! By the time you're done creating some DIY "chicken scratch" intake, the amount of effort and aggravation involved will probably surpass the cost of the after market part.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:43 AM   #7
Rennzenn
 
j.fro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,369
Garage
Funny, no one's really answered your questions. If you install an aftermarket intake and filter, it's most likely that the filter is oiled. It is a known fact that an over-oiled filter can foul the mass air flow sensor, and this will cause the CEL. The Porsche ECU has no problem adjusting for any greater airflow gained by adding an aftermarket intake/filter. Yes, there can be an HP gain with a higher flowing filter/intake, but there are certainly things to consider.
Generally, HP gains made by swapping stock parts for aftermarket parts will cost you in street drivability/legality
...which is why I'm starting to show for a trailer (and possibly add another Porsche to the stable!)
j.fro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 07:42 AM   #8
jakesbox
 
trimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Danger View Post
First off, the intakes range between $300-$400 not $600. They do seem to be less restrictive than the oem set-up, and the "bark" that they produce at various rpm's is nothing short of ripping ! By the time you're done creating some DIY "chicken scratch" intake, the amount of effort and aggravation involved will probably surpass the cost of the after market part.
600 installed is what I am hearing...part plus install.
trimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 09:47 AM   #9
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,121
the cai in the boxster is an oxymoron - the box already has a cold air intake (ps, even with snorkel removed, the intake remains sealed from hot engine air).

the aftermarket units don't seal and will draw hot engine air in, reducing performance as a result. further, a bit of research will show that vendors of cai's (evo, etc.) market the same unit for the 2.5, 2.7, 2.9 and 3.2 and use a common mass airflow sensor housing. strangely, the 2.5 and 3.2 have different maf housing diameters, so you start screwing with the ecu's ability to adapt at this point.

what you want to do is reduce restriction to air intake. cai's do this, but the cost and other side effects are not worth it. instead, remove your snorkle. change the pipe between your throttle body and air box. replace your airbox with a less restrictive airbox from a cayman/987. get a larger intake plenum and/or throttle body (997 unit, ipd, softronic). this will all reduce intake restrictions, keep the air cool, and not detrimentally affect intake tuning.
The Radium King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 12:39 PM   #10
Registered User
 
tanque55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: mexico
Posts: 173
My mistake, I looked up desnorkeling on the search. Doesn't really seem like it would add much to the overall performance. Not like it's a F1 machine!

Last edited by tanque55; 09-28-2012 at 12:48 PM.
tanque55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 01:02 PM   #11
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,121
well, your engine moves what, 1.6 liters of air per rotation in a 3.2 l engine? at redline that = 11,500 liters of air per minute. sucking all that air in through a 3" pipe (reduced to 2.7" at the throttle body, and even less at the snorkel) takes work, and any work the engine does to suck that air in is power lost to the wheels. any inefficiencies in this airflow have a proportional effect on performance. something as seemingly minor as the snorkel, or the resonance chambers on an intake tube, will increase engine effort which will reduce horsepower. note, on a 250 hp engine, a 1% loss = 2.5 hp.
The Radium King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 04:15 PM   #12
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
I have a brand new EVO unit that I'll take 150.00 for just to get it out of the store room. We never use these things, its been here since 2008!
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:15 PM   #13
02 box s
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alabama
Posts: 226
Jake,
I will take it. I will call tomorrow, or feel free to call me. 256-874-1667
sgt brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 07:48 PM   #14
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Sold. Thanks for getting that thing out of my way!
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 03:52 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Nimbus117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northampton, England.
Posts: 256
I bought and fitted one of these - EuroCupGT Highflow Induction Kit Boxster 986.

Porsche Boxster Performance 986 K&N Filter & Engine Induction | Air Ducts UK

They claim 10-20hp which I think is rubbish, does make a fab induction roar though. Got it off Ebay for £60.
Nimbus117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:13 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,537
This always bugs me.

We have cold air induction on every Boxster from the factory. We take air into the engine from outside the hot engine compartment so the air is cooler/denser.

What you guys are talking about is a low-restriction air filter.

Of course with low restriction comes a downside, more and larger particles of dirt get into the engine. Seen two tests by independent test facilities.

Also I've had tuners with no axe to grind or $ to gain by selling me something tell me the stock air filter is just fine for about everything but a highly enlarged/modified/tracked motor.
mikefocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 08:45 AM   #17
02 box s
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alabama
Posts: 226
ok, just to let everyone know, i plan on messing with the evo to try and see if i can come up with something like the canister style that is in the other thread. i figured "what the heck" for 150.00. my take on the whole thing is that there are indeed restrictions introduced in the factory box and piping. some are there probably to mitigate the boxster's encroachment on the 911 and others are there for sound abatement. either way the airflow, while cold, is circuitous. from what i can gather, jake has indicated that the intake and exhaust are the significant restrictions. the heads flow huge numbers if what i read is correct. therefore relieving the intake exhaust restrictions should help. i will certainly let everyone know how it works out, but expect it to sit in my shed for a while before i get to this project.

brad
sgt brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 01:20 AM   #18
Registered User
 
Nimbus117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northampton, England.
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefocke View Post
This always bugs me.

We have cold air induction on every Boxster from the factory. We take air into the engine from outside the hot engine compartment so the air is cooler/denser.

What you guys are talking about is a low-restriction air filter.

Of course with low restriction comes a downside, more and larger particles of dirt get into the engine. Seen two tests by independent test facilities.

Also I've had tuners with no axe to grind or $ to gain by selling me something tell me the stock air filter is just fine for about everything but a highly enlarged/modified/tracked motor.

I still have the standard air filter in my system, only changed the intake pipe.

The Porsche offering has a muffler to cut down the induction roar, I replaced it with a straight through pipe as per my previous posting. It's a little larger diameter, aluminium instead of plastic and no restricting muffler arrangement.

Sounds good at full throttle.
Nimbus117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 03:12 PM   #19
02 box s
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alabama
Posts: 226
Can someone fill me in on what exactly comes with the evo cai kit. just trying too make sure that I got everything. Thanks.
sgt brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 03:57 PM   #20
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt brad View Post
Can someone fill me in on what exactly comes with the evo cai kit. just trying too make sure that I got everything. Thanks.
Thats a full evo kit as they were provided in 2007 or so. Then the kit had an optional air filter, but now it comes with a K&N knock off. I'd use a real K&N cone filter and find the largest one that you can fit.

__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page