Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2012, 04:13 AM   #1
jakesbox
 
trimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 759
Ive just heard a lot about them...so I was more curious. I can not imagine spending $600+ for a cold air intake for what they say is 3-4 more horsepwoer. Again - just more curious than anything...
trimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 04:29 AM   #2
Registered User
 
JAAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
Especially in you climate stock is best. You can upgrade your intake piping but leave the stock box. Pedrosgarage.com has a good method to do this.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
JAAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:03 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by trimer View Post
Ive just heard a lot about them...so I was more curious. I can not imagine spending $600+ for a cold air intake for what they say is 3-4 more horsepwoer. Again - just more curious than anything...
First off, the intakes range between $300-$400 not $600. They do seem to be less restrictive than the oem set-up, and the "bark" that they produce at various rpm's is nothing short of ripping ! By the time you're done creating some DIY "chicken scratch" intake, the amount of effort and aggravation involved will probably surpass the cost of the after market part.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:43 AM   #4
Rennzenn
 
j.fro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,369
Garage
Funny, no one's really answered your questions. If you install an aftermarket intake and filter, it's most likely that the filter is oiled. It is a known fact that an over-oiled filter can foul the mass air flow sensor, and this will cause the CEL. The Porsche ECU has no problem adjusting for any greater airflow gained by adding an aftermarket intake/filter. Yes, there can be an HP gain with a higher flowing filter/intake, but there are certainly things to consider.
Generally, HP gains made by swapping stock parts for aftermarket parts will cost you in street drivability/legality
...which is why I'm starting to show for a trailer (and possibly add another Porsche to the stable!)
j.fro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 07:42 AM   #5
jakesbox
 
trimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Danger View Post
First off, the intakes range between $300-$400 not $600. They do seem to be less restrictive than the oem set-up, and the "bark" that they produce at various rpm's is nothing short of ripping ! By the time you're done creating some DIY "chicken scratch" intake, the amount of effort and aggravation involved will probably surpass the cost of the after market part.
600 installed is what I am hearing...part plus install.
trimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 09:47 AM   #6
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,150
the cai in the boxster is an oxymoron - the box already has a cold air intake (ps, even with snorkel removed, the intake remains sealed from hot engine air).

the aftermarket units don't seal and will draw hot engine air in, reducing performance as a result. further, a bit of research will show that vendors of cai's (evo, etc.) market the same unit for the 2.5, 2.7, 2.9 and 3.2 and use a common mass airflow sensor housing. strangely, the 2.5 and 3.2 have different maf housing diameters, so you start screwing with the ecu's ability to adapt at this point.

what you want to do is reduce restriction to air intake. cai's do this, but the cost and other side effects are not worth it. instead, remove your snorkle. change the pipe between your throttle body and air box. replace your airbox with a less restrictive airbox from a cayman/987. get a larger intake plenum and/or throttle body (997 unit, ipd, softronic). this will all reduce intake restrictions, keep the air cool, and not detrimentally affect intake tuning.
The Radium King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 12:39 PM   #7
Registered User
 
tanque55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: mexico
Posts: 173
My mistake, I looked up desnorkeling on the search. Doesn't really seem like it would add much to the overall performance. Not like it's a F1 machine!

Last edited by tanque55; 09-28-2012 at 12:48 PM.
tanque55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 01:02 PM   #8
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,150
well, your engine moves what, 1.6 liters of air per rotation in a 3.2 l engine? at redline that = 11,500 liters of air per minute. sucking all that air in through a 3" pipe (reduced to 2.7" at the throttle body, and even less at the snorkel) takes work, and any work the engine does to suck that air in is power lost to the wheels. any inefficiencies in this airflow have a proportional effect on performance. something as seemingly minor as the snorkel, or the resonance chambers on an intake tube, will increase engine effort which will reduce horsepower. note, on a 250 hp engine, a 1% loss = 2.5 hp.
The Radium King is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page