12-02-2010, 05:00 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: melbourne
Posts: 64
|
Thanks guys for the feedback,
My water pump has just blown so looks like ill be doing the pulley while im in there.
will order from Tarret engineering or flat 6,
any reccomendations? or are they all pretty much the same?
will let you know how it goes
thanks
|
|
|
12-03-2010, 05:39 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsisco
Thanks guys for the feedback,
My water pump has just blown so looks like ill be doing the pulley while im in there.
will order from Tarret engineering or flat 6,
any reccomendations? or are they all pretty much the same?
will let you know how it goes
thanks
|
I installed the BBI on my vehicle about a year ago . At the time, it was considered the lightest and best designed pulley of the lot. However, Jake at Flat 6 has since come out with his own which I'm sure is excellent also.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
12-09-2010, 08:30 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: melbourne
Posts: 64
|
ended up going with the newest design from BB1 from tarrett engineering,
will be installing over the weekend along with my engine mount, water pump and LN thermostat,
will let you know how it goes.
ps. is there any gains to be had from removing the cats on a 2.5?
thanks
|
|
|
12-09-2010, 08:57 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
|
8hp. and a check engine.. Fabspeed makes some sweet bypass pipes.. That is what I am running.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
|
|
|
12-10-2010, 08:09 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 2,485
|
"ended up going with the newest design from BB1 from tarrett engineering"
Are you changing to a shorter belt as well, or were you going to see if the oem belt works? Any trouble with grinding down the boss that apparently is in the way?
Be nice to see some pics!
Mark
__________________
'99 black 986
|
|
|
12-11-2010, 10:34 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: melbourne
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAY
8hp. and a check engine.. Fabspeed makes some sweet bypass pipes.. That is what I am running.
|
how do you get rid of the check engine light?
|
|
|
12-12-2010, 05:19 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsisco
how do you get rid of the check engine light?
|
To clear the CEL, you would have to reprogram the ecu in order for it to disregard the fact that the cats have been deleted. In my experience, going "catless" resulted in a significant loss of low end and mid range torque. Since the 2.5 engine only has one set of cats, you would be better off upgrading to a set of high quality lower cell units. This, however, can be an expen$$$$ive .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Last edited by Johnny Danger; 12-28-2010 at 09:24 AM.
|
|
|
12-12-2010, 06:51 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
|
Probably true on the 2.5. I have a 3.4 so in my case it is different.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
|
|
|
12-13-2010, 03:23 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: melbourne
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Danger
To clear the CEL, you would have to reprogram the ecu in order for it to disregard the fact that the cats have been deleted. In my experiencing, going "catless" resulted in a significant loss of low end and mid range torque. Since the 2.5 engine only has one set of cats, you would be better off upgrading to a set of high quality lower cell units. This, however, can be an expen$$$$ive .
|
my ecu already has powerchip software,
so u don't recommend removing the cats? losing torque is the last thing i wanted to do,
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:50 AM.
| |