08-18-2010, 06:49 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,128
|
ebay 3.2 to 3.8
here's some fun ...
linky
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 07:01 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 628
|
Fairly cheap price but I've heard nothing but bad news about Motormeister.
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 09:02 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Do it nice or do it twice!
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 09:09 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
As someone who has built a 3.8 from a 996 3.6 set of case halves and heads, I have re-searched this topic deeply. Unless they are running thinner walled sleeves than LN does, the maximum bore is 99mm. Only the 3.6 and 3.8 motors came with a 82.8mm crank, as everything else uses a 78mm crank. This is why with the LN procedure, you wind up with a 3.2 to a 3.6 (99 bore by 78 stroke). There's no way they are including a new crank and bearing carrier for that price.
Other than that, their parts list appears to be a copy from their air cooled offerings, which is rather incorrect in multiple areas. I like how they list "pro series cylinders installed" (this isn't like putting jugs on an air cooler) and "German Glyco" bearings (Glyco doesn't make bearings for the water cooled stuff).
Other than that, a quick search on google will dig up a long list of people who Motor Meister has pissed off.
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 09:17 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,128
|
the listing certainly gave me the willies for many many reasons, but my deeply entrenched need to stir the pot forced me to post it here, if only to be able to stand back and watch the fur fly!
|
|
|
08-18-2010, 04:01 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 164
|
Doesn't say anything about an offset ground crank...that's quite a large increase in displacement with just boring.
__________________
1999 Boxster 3.4L
2007 BMW 328i
1992 Jeep Wrangler
|
|
|
08-19-2010, 02:19 AM
|
#7
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
It is **possible** to take a bore out that large. I'll not say anything else because I can't without negativity.. I will only state that we have limited our bore sizes for a purpose.
What I find interesting is a simple item like even an AOS, read their description for that component and see what you think..
Its also to be noted that bigger isn't generally better, at 3.6 the 3.2 heads are on the verge of not being effective without port work and larger valves. At this point the engine gets close to the edge of inefficiency and a narrowed powerband from the smaller port.
The combustion chamber of the 3.2 head is such that it nets an 11:1 CR factory, when you go up in displacement with that same size chamber without a specially prepared piston CR can see 14:1!!
Just some things to consider, in no way meant as a slam to MM, I just wanted to stimulate thought a bit :-)
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
08-19-2010, 03:45 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,022
|
Jake! You've become a MASTER of diplomacy!
|
|
|
08-19-2010, 08:32 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
at 3.6 the 3.2 heads are on the verge of not being effective without port work and larger valves. At this point the engine gets close to the edge of inefficiency and a narrowed powerband from the smaller port.
The combustion chamber of the 3.2 head is such that it nets an 11:1 CR factory, when you go up in displacement with that same size chamber without a specially prepared piston CR can see 14:1!!
|
This is why I started with a 996 3.6, that and the ability to have the newer vane type VarioCam and VarioCam Plus.
CC'ing the heads with the JE pistons yields 12.8:1 for me.
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
08-19-2010, 12:23 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
It is **possible** to take a bore out that large. I'll not say anything else because I can't without negativity.. I will only state that we have limited our bore sizes for a purpose.
What I find interesting is a simple item like even an AOS, read their description for that component and see what you think..
Its also to be noted that bigger isn't generally better, at 3.6 the 3.2 heads are on the verge of not being effective without port work and larger valves. At this point the engine gets close to the edge of inefficiency and a narrowed powerband from the smaller port.
The combustion chamber of the 3.2 head is such that it nets an 11:1 CR factory, when you go up in displacement with that same size chamber without a specially prepared piston CR can see 14:1!!
Just some things to consider, in no way meant as a slam to MM, I just wanted to stimulate thought a bit :-)
|
Let me be a little more forward about MM than Jake. They have long reputation in the aircooled world of producing utter crap! Dont walk but run away from this stuff.
Consider Jake the Rolex of engine builders and MM the guy on the corner selling fake Rolexs for 5 bucks.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 PM.
| |