Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-14-2010, 06:46 AM   #4
Carnut
 
AndyA6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
On a straight six like a BMW I'd never put an undampened UDP, totally negative effects.
On the other hand I have one on my 1.8T Audi for years and years now, no ill effect. First shorter crank, 2nd here in the US one never drives for extended period of times with high rpm like on the Autobanhn where you'd go pedal to the metal for hours at a time. That would be a bad idea with an UDP!

Maybe not Boxster related but on my last aircooled Porsche ('90 C2) I had a lightweight OEM flywheel and clutch (RS parts). So no more dual mass damping there.

For above reasons and 'cause the crank on our cars is rather short I will go with an UDP. And if the clutch wears out (I doubt it) or the DMF goes kaputt I change from an UPD to a light flywheel/clutch setup.

Besides, I drive the Boxster for maybe 5-6,000mls per year-if that-, for the engine to wear out faster with the UDP it would take me how many years???
__________________
'14 Boxster
AndyA6 is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page