Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2009, 03:59 PM   #1
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Do you have a plot that was done in power Vs RPM??

Thats not a very strong 3.4 at all.. even on the better plots. What intake and etc are you running on this engine? Based on the dips at changeover and the powerband I think I know.
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 04:26 PM   #2
07 Carrera S Cab
 
Boxtaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
Garage
You guys are somethin else. If I'm not mistaken, Jay paid for the first dyno after installing the technotorque on his own coin, and posted the results. That was all he was going to do, and then some people wanted him to do a second dyno after 200 miles, so as to confirm his results and let the ECU fully adapt to the TT.

He agree to do the second pull if people helped him pay for it, even though he wasn't planning on doing the second pull, and then he did the pull even though he only got a fraction of what it cost to do the second dyno pull. Then, he gets jumped on because he's trying to give some value back to those few who actually paid him to have the second pull done. Man, you guys should cut him a little slack.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue

Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
Boxtaboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 04:36 PM   #3
Registered User
 
edevlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
Thanks for the plot Jay, I never tire of seeing dyno plots of our cars, enjoy,

Ed

__________________
My Car Webpage

2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
edevlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 05:13 PM   #4
Registered User
 
JAAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
Thanks for backing me up. Stock air box. I have some other things to check tomorrow. Just spotted a blockage. Because of being de snorked the stock box fell a bit below the hole for the inlet. I'll some how fix that tomorrow. Anyone have a stock snorkle for me?
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
JAAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 06:23 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bastrop, TX
Posts: 705
I asked this before, but I think it got lost in all of the hoopla from before.

Does anyone have any thoughts on why it shows a decrease in HP and Torque? I would like to guess that the TT takes up space. It decreases the volume of the intake. The flow may be more linear, however I would bet that the Cubic feet per min of air is lower than stock because the TT reduces overall volume.

If you look at factory exampes of this technology, you will notice that it makes laminar flow of air without changing the overall volume of the air intake tubes.
__________________
2002 S
Pedro rear stabilizer bar, CF strut braces, Maxspeed headers with 100 cell cats, Fabspeed cat bypass pipes, H&R springs with M030 setup, TRG rear links, EVO air intake, B&M Short shift kit, Raby IMS upgrade, Raby underdrive pulley

Last edited by jhandy; 11-12-2009 at 08:09 PM.
jhandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 10:26 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 434
Those of you who are giving JAAY crap - bugger off. It's people like you who make forums suck, NOT people like Jaay.

Jaay did nothing but try to (a) accumulate some decent data about the effectiveness of Pedro's part, and (b) try to share it in a way that wouldn't endorse or disparage the TT. I was happy to pay the ten bucks and am willing to send it back to Jaay if he wants it.
__________________
1999 Carrera 4 • Aero kit • 4" UD Pulley
My Corvette doesn't leak oil... it sweats horsepower.
sd_boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 07:22 AM   #7
dalealan2001
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
All these "performance" modifcations remind me off "The Little Engine That Could" gone awry. Want more horsepower, better handling, clean hands? Sell your old car and buy a new one. Because they are faster, have more horsepower, handle better and smell new.
Your money would be better spent in a savings account to help you buy your new car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 07:48 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by sd_boxster
Those of you who are giving JAAY crap - bugger off. It's people like you who make forums suck, NOT people like Jaay.

Jaay did nothing but try to (a) accumulate some decent data about the effectiveness of Pedro's part, and (b) try to share it in a way that wouldn't endorse or disparage the TT. I was happy to pay the ten bucks and am willing to send it back to Jaay if he wants it.
All I did was point out that JAAY could have just sent the dyno info to the "all three" of the people who sent the donations, instead of creating a new post callling out the TECHNO TORQUE DYNO, only to not share any info... in JAYY's defense, he does give out good info alot, and contributes good stuff to the forum, I guess I was just in a grumpy mood when I wrote that....sorry JAAY...
fastorange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 07:57 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAAY
Thanks for backing me up. Stock air box. I have some other things to check tomorrow. Just spotted a blockage. Because of being de snorked the stock box fell a bit below the hole for the inlet. I'll some how fix that tomorrow. Anyone have a stock snorkle for me?
Jaay,

I think that I still have my oem snorkle sitting around. You are more than welcome to it. How soon do you need it ?

Johnny
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 09:42 AM   #10
Registered User
 
JAAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
Dalealan2001,

If I wanted a new car I would just go buy one. Not every one wants a new car. The 986 is the same as a 987. I have a 3.4, I have a 987 tranny, I have a 987 clutch, I could use heated seats Some suspension work and I am good to go. I happen to really like the 986 and I like to turn wrenches on it. Kinda my hobby and release from the norm. I like having trouble with it and having to figure it out. Getting your hands dirty is not for everyone. As for handling better that is another fun thing to mess around with. Take something that has the same platform and upgrade and tune it. Smells like new... My car has less miles than most two year old cars and stays in a garage under a cover. Smells good to me. I just like my car. I don't think I will get rid of my 986 ever. I may buy something different but there is no reason to sell it.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
JAAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2009, 11:10 AM   #11
dalealan2001
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I understand your point if you enjoy working on your car. But a lot of people spend a lot of money in the aftermarket parts area for "performance" parts that do not do as they advertise. And before you know it they have sunk thousands upon thousands of dollars never even comming close to what a new car performance achieves. I know because I have done this before. It's an easy trap to get into.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2009, 04:32 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
Do you have a plot that was done in power Vs RPM??

Thats not a very strong 3.4 at all.. even on the better plots. What intake and etc are you running on this engine? Based on the dips at changeover and the powerband I think I know.
His sig only says he's running a BMC filter on the intake side, guessing with the stock box?
__________________
'03 3.2L GuardsRed/Blk/Blk---6Spd
Options: Litronics, 18" Carrera lights, Bose sound, Painted to match roll bars.
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m...Mautocross.jpg
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page