11-12-2009, 12:47 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 212
|
I agree with JAAY and what he did. Stop and think about it rationally fastorange and yimmy and read his replies carefully.
Albeit I would like to know the results myself (having slight financial problems are stopping me from contributing for right now) but I respect JAAYs decision and think he made the best choice.
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 02:50 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
|
I just refunded all that donated. You guys are unbelievable. So many people here want info and yet have nothing to share. We all like Pedrosgarge.com He is a great guy and has a lot of time into his products and some are on some real race cars. Each car is different and my setup is not what anyone has that I know of here. My numbers are my numbers. Make your own judgments and test the products on your car for individual results. TT was developed for 2.5, 3.2 and 2.7's I tried it on something that there were no claims to make power on. Below are my results.
The Red is my stock original 3.4 swap numbers. The Blue is the Techno Torque installed and the 200 miles on the car. More than enough to learn.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 03:08 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 212
|
JAAY.. I appreciate your posting, but in essence you were originally correct in your approach to the TT.
It saddens me somewhat that you did cave and share to people who did not take an active interest in this project, yet it was kind of you to refund the money donated.
In turn, it is nice to be able to benefit from the open information but in doing so you upset yourself and financially inconvenienced yourself for all our benefit. For that I am great full that you are a member of this community and your contributions are appreciated by all.
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 03:39 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
|
Here's a guy who showed the initiative to conduct a "test" with his own time and mainly his own money, he clearly announced his intents and requests for help beforehand. Now through the "pissing" of some posters he's said "screw it, here you go". Some of you guys are incredible.
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 03:59 PM
|
#5
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Do you have a plot that was done in power Vs RPM??
Thats not a very strong 3.4 at all.. even on the better plots. What intake and etc are you running on this engine? Based on the dips at changeover and the powerband I think I know.
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 04:26 PM
|
#6
|
07 Carrera S Cab
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
|
You guys are somethin else. If I'm not mistaken, Jay paid for the first dyno after installing the technotorque on his own coin, and posted the results. That was all he was going to do, and then some people wanted him to do a second dyno after 200 miles, so as to confirm his results and let the ECU fully adapt to the TT.
He agree to do the second pull if people helped him pay for it, even though he wasn't planning on doing the second pull, and then he did the pull even though he only got a fraction of what it cost to do the second dyno pull. Then, he gets jumped on because he's trying to give some value back to those few who actually paid him to have the second pull done. Man, you guys should cut him a little slack.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue
Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 04:36 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
|
Thanks for the plot Jay, I never tire of seeing dyno plots of our cars, enjoy,
Ed
__________________
My Car Webpage
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
|
|
|
11-12-2009, 04:32 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
Do you have a plot that was done in power Vs RPM??
Thats not a very strong 3.4 at all.. even on the better plots. What intake and etc are you running on this engine? Based on the dips at changeover and the powerband I think I know.
|
His sig only says he's running a BMC filter on the intake side, guessing with the stock box?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM.
| |