Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2009, 08:21 AM   #1
Porscheectomy
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
I don't like the idea that the guide is a wear item. They should be rollers instead. I built the attached in CAD. More rollers are better but this conveys the idea. If you want, I can help you develop the part with CAD and finite element analysis. Send me a PM.

Last edited by blue2000s; 01-13-2009 at 09:36 AM.
blue2000s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 11:21 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 380
Garage
Jake..

Did one of the 3.2L tensioners survive the damage intact? If so, could you post a picture of the 2 side by side.

Is it fair to say the "newer" design is less robust than the old 2.5L design? If so, what would you guess the cost of material saved might be between the 2 parts?

Thanks
__________________
2013 Boxster S
2006 Boxster--sold
1999 Boxster--sold
MikenOH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 04:21 PM   #3
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
I don't like the idea that the guide is a wear item. They should be rollers instead. I built the attached in CAD. More rollers are better but this conveys the idea. If you want, I can help you develop the part with CAD and finite element analysis. Send me a PM.
This design also has some issues as the roller axles are a failure point and the contact patch of the rollers would result in point loading. The drive chain is also a very hard composition that would create some challenges in metallurgy development and heat treat of the rollers, it would be easy to create more issues with chain wear with an arrangement like this. I do appreciate the concept and your input.

We do solid modeling and FE analysis in house along with LN Engineering on all the update components, but I do appreciate your willingness to assist us with the design of the updated component.
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 08:15 PM   #4
Porscheectomy
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
This design also has some issues as the roller axles are a failure point and the contact patch of the rollers would result in point loading. The drive chain is also a very hard composition that would create some challenges in metallurgy development and heat treat of the rollers, it would be easy to create more issues with chain wear with an arrangement like this. I do appreciate the concept and your input.

We do solid modeling and FE analysis in house along with LN Engineering on all the update components, but I do appreciate your willingness to assist us with the design of the updated component.
Very simple, add shallow teeth to the rollers and they turn with the chain. Like I said, it's just for the concept. Point loading is what a bearing is made for. This is a very simple problem to fix.

Last edited by blue2000s; 01-13-2009 at 08:17 PM.
blue2000s is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page