Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2007, 01:25 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 217
Octane Booster Additive

Hi all,

Just wanted to get some view on fuel octane booster additive. I run 98 RON adn was thinking about using some additive to give my 2.7 2000 boxy a little more zing for a drive I am planning this weekend.

Your thoughts & comments would be appreciated.

aussieboxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 06:33 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 740
Increasing your octane level beyond what is recommended by your car manufacturer is a complete waste of money and will not result in any power gains. There are some good threads about gas around here.

It's an unfortunate belief that the higher the octane the more power the gas has. It's actually the reverse since most, if not all, octane boosters contain additives which have less caloric value than petroleum. This leads people to spend more money in the mistaken belief that they are giving their car a "treat". The only thing octane does is prevent premature detonation (or knocking). The higher the engine compression, essentially the higher the necessary octane rating.

So, unless you've done some work on your car to get a really high compression ratio - you don't need any higher octane than that recommended by the manufacturer. If you're already putting in the right octane - adding anything is just a waste of money...
__________________

'06 Cayenne Turbo S, Beige Metallic/Tan

Ex - '99 Arctic Silver, Red Interior, Silver Top
denverpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 07:19 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Hi,

All refined Gasoline contains the same amount of energy - approx. 114,132 btu/gal. The measure of octane is only a measure of the Fuel's ability to resist spontaneous combustion. It is NOT a measure of the Fuel's energy or power.

Back in World War I, Aviators had a problem, many engines would suddenly self destruct through detonation, not good if you're up in the air. An engine might run fine on one batch of fuel, but blow holes in the pistons on the next batch. The fuels seemed the same, weighed the same and may have even come from the same factory.

The fuel companies tried to analyze and standardise the fuel, but were unable to weed out the bad batches. Therefore a standard test engine with a variable compression facility was built and the fuel to be tested run through it. This heavy duty, single cylinder engine would be warmed to a standard temperature and at a set rpm the compression increased until engine knock occurred. This would give its Highest Usable Compression Ratio (HUCR).

But with time it was discovered that different labs gave different results. So in an attempt to produce an unvarying standard, two reference fuels were chosen. The high reference was 2-2-4 trimethylpentane (iso-octane), rated at 100 Octane. The low reference was normal heptane (n-heptane), rated at 0 Octane. Once the HUCR was determined, a mix of these to fuels was made up that exactly produced the same results as the HUCR test. The result is quoted as the percentage of iso-octane. Hence a fuel that detonated the same as a mix of 90% iso-octane and 10% n-heptane is called a 90 octane fuel.

The Octane Rating of Gasoline can be determined in 2 ways. Research Octane Number (RON) and Motor Octane Number (MON).

MON is always significantly lower than the RON.

The Research Octane Number Method, or "RON", is done on a standard test engine in a lab. The air temperature is controlled on this to a strict 125° F. Mild loads are put on the engine, approximating the loads you might put on your family car under normal driving conditions. This is called an F1 test.

The Motor Octane Number Method or "MON", uses standard test engine on a dyno which can alter it's load, and the air is introduced into the inlet at 300° F. Heavy loads, similar to full-throttle acceleration, passing on uphills, etc. are dialed into the engine. This is called the F2 test.

In each of these tests, an engineer notes ping and detonation at certain load conditions. This is then compared to two components of Gasoline - Isooctane (C8C18) a high value reference fuel. It has a knock resistance value of 100 RON, and N-heptane (C7C16) is a low value reference fuel. It is very prone to knock and has a value for 0 RON. The octane rating is determined by the fuel's ability to control the detonation against these reference fuels.

In most of the World, the RON method of determining the octane rating is used. In the US, we use the Pump Octane Number Method "PON" which is actually the average of the two - RON and MON (R+M/2). For example, if the F1 test showed 94 octane and the F2 test indicated 86, then the Pump Octane Number rating would be 90.

Now, so far as Octane Boosters are concerned, these are generally a waste of money. Most octane boosters are nitrogen carriers. Common ingredients are Methanol, Isopropyl Alcohol, Naptha, Xylene, Toluene (Tyline), Benzine, Hexane, Nitro Benzine and Aniline. Using these in quantities of no more than 3oz./gal. will raise the fuel's octane rating, but only by 0.02 octane or so. Counter-intuitively, their efficacy actually drops beyond these concentrations.

As stated, Octane in itself does not add power - it's just a measurement. However, an engine that's run on fuel with a lower octane than what's needed will run hot, detonate, and eventually lose power. The proper octane level will let the engine run to its full potential, but won't transform it into something special!

There are negative side effects to using Octane Boosters as well. They will attack plastics, rubbers and some fiberglass. They can discolor and attack most paints. Fuel filters will deteriorate if used with a booster-carrying gasoline. Also, some oils are affected by octane boosters. They can also make an engine run rich. Most are toxic to the skin, and the fumes can make you sick. Exposure to air can cause a 50-percent breakdown in their effectiveness and Ultraviolet rays will make octane boosters deteriorate. They will attack gas tank sealants and could plug up your entire fuel system if used together.

Add to this that most Octane Boosters actually cost on the order of some $80+/gal. (all for only some 0.02 Octane increase) when sold in consumer-sized packaging, and there's really no practical benefit to using them. 98 RON Fuel is equivalent to approx. 90 MON, or 94 PON and more than adequate for the engine to achieve it's peak performance. Hope this helps...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

Last edited by MNBoxster; 04-23-2007 at 01:59 PM.
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 07:38 AM   #4
boggtown
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I will buy them sometimes, but not for the octane, the injector cleaners and stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 07:43 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 740
Jim - So basically what I said with a lot less words... Kidding.

Actually while I knew about some of the things you wrote, I really enjoyed the historical aspect. Nothing like history to put things into perspective. Thanks!
__________________

'06 Cayenne Turbo S, Beige Metallic/Tan

Ex - '99 Arctic Silver, Red Interior, Silver Top
denverpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 08:05 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 166
I've seen a lot of pro & con posts for Octane Boosters, but your post was certainly the most informative! Thanks, Jim.
__________________
BoxsterBob - CA
2014 Boxster S
Previous - 1999 Boxster / 1972 914
BoxsterBob - CA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 12:33 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
Very much have to agree with Jim here. If you want fuel system treatment/ cleaner, the best I have found is BG 44K. On an older, dirty motor, believe it or not, Sea Foam works wonders in those applications too.

Patrick
Cloudsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 12:41 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 939
What Jim said.

More octane does not = more power.
__________________
2001 Boxster - Grey on Grey
1969 911T Targa - 'Stinky'

http://www.zoto.com/frayadjacent/img...f27a-4a399.jpg <---- my car. ^ crap I post.

"The existence of the flamethrower is evidence that someone, somewhere once said 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't want to have to walk over there to do it.'"
FrayAdjacent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 09:43 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 217
Thanks Guys

Hey thanks a lot guys for all your input, especially JIm for taking the time for make such a detailed reply, I really appreciate it.

Ok so the octance booster is a waste of time. I suppose I should have waited to read your replies before buying it today. I had basically an empty tank so I dropped in a capfull and maybe it's my imagination, which is quite possible, it did seem a little quicker.

It does have a injector cleaner aswell so I'll just use it for that and not bother in the future.

Thanks again, this forum is awsome.

aussieboxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page