Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > DIY Project Guides

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2014, 01:26 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: pa
Posts: 32
Thanks for taking the time to document -really informative .What are APC bolts ?Familiar with ARP but not APC .
Thanks..............
dcdrechsel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2014, 02:47 PM   #2
Registered User
 
flaps10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 429
It is ARP, sorry. CRS is obviously creeping in too.

As for ims options they number a bit fewer for those of us with a dual row bearing.
There is stock which is probably the weakest option. I take that back, the pelican kit that installs a single row bearing and spacer is my least favorite solution.
With no plain bearing ever going to happen, this leaves the roller bearing by EPS as sold by vertex or the LN dual row ceramic.

One thing I haven't noticed on any of the various porsche forums that i frequent is anyone saying either product had let them down. Also, when presented with the diagnoses for my metal filled engine Jake asked that i not use the LN bearing, and rightly so for someone wanting to protect a company reputation.

I don't know that anything I'm doing here would change his opinion. That said, the bearing is currently still available to the consumer and is easily the most confidence inspiring option available.

So far no one has called me for having all six connecting rods installed. In real life bank 1-3 rods have the piston attached and are pushed through the case and the rod caps done after. I really wanted to get a feel for how the parts fit. The entire thing is sitting at low torque..Ive decided to go in for a stretch gauge before exercising the new torque wrench i received for Christmas.
flaps10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 07:23 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 146
Send a message via AIM to ultimate1 Send a message via Yahoo to ultimate1
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by flaps10 View Post
It is ARP, sorry. CRS is obviously creeping in too.

As for ims options they number a bit fewer for those of us with a dual row bearing.
There is stock which is probably the weakest option. I take that back, the pelican kit that installs a single row bearing and spacer is my least favorite solution.
With no plain bearing ever going to happen, this leaves the roller bearing by EPS as sold by vertex or the LN dual row ceramic.

One thing I haven't noticed on any of the various porsche forums that i frequent is anyone saying either product had let them down. Also, when presented with the diagnoses for my metal filled engine Jake asked that i not use the LN bearing, and rightly so for someone wanting to protect a company reputation.

I don't know that anything I'm doing here would change his opinion. That said, the bearing is currently still available to the consumer and is easily the most confidence inspiring option available.

So far no one has called me for having all six connecting rods installed. In real life bank 1-3 rods have the piston attached and are pushed through the case and the rod caps done after. I really wanted to get a feel for how the parts fit. The entire thing is sitting at low torque..Ive decided to go in for a stretch gauge before exercising the new torque wrench i received for Christmas.
I also have a dual row bearing and on my second LN ceramic bearing and I added the TuneRS direct oil feed last year. Keep in mind that I drive my car a fair amount on the highway. I drive it like a Porsche was meant to be driven and I am at around 166k on the odometer. I do know that TuneRS has been racing their cars for several years using this setup. Here is the link. Plus you can use either the LN bearing, EPS bearing or the steal bearing just like the original one supplied with the Direct Oil Feed kit. I might add that the original IMS was not the reason I had to rebuild my engine at about 116k miles. The 5th and 6th cylnders had oil deposits. Another reason why you never follow Porsche corporate / dealership advice for oil changes every 15k or 7500 miles. Special thanks to whoever owned my car first for that. Anyway that ordeal taught me a lot about my Boxster.

Lubrication has always been the problem. I thing the EPS sounds like a good idea but I would feel a lot more comfortable if more people shared their experience with the EPS before I were to consider it in when I decide to drop in a 3.2 or 3.4 in my Boxster. Here is the link for you to check it out.

DIRECT OIL FEED (DOF) FOR IMS BEARINGS | TuneRS Motorsports

I am looking forward to your progress on this thread because I want to do the same thing with a 3.2 or 3.4 to have ready when I hit 200 or 250k on the odometer
ultimate1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2014, 12:30 AM   #4
Registered User
 
rp17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by flaps10 View Post
It is ARP, sorry. CRS is obviously creeping in too.

As for ims options they number a bit fewer for those of us with a dual row bearing.
There is stock which is probably the weakest option. I take that back, the pelican kit that installs a single row bearing and spacer is my least favorite solution.
With no plain bearing ever going to happen, this leaves the roller bearing by EPS as sold by vertex or the LN dual row ceramic.

One thing I haven't noticed on any of the various porsche forums that i frequent is anyone saying either product had let them down. Also, when presented with the diagnoses for my metal filled engine Jake asked that i not use the LN bearing, and rightly so for someone wanting to protect a company reputation.

I don't know that anything I'm doing here would change his opinion. That said, the bearing is currently still available to the consumer and is easily the most confidence inspiring option available.

So far no one has called me for having all six connecting rods installed. In real life bank 1-3 rods have the piston attached and are pushed through the case and the rod caps done after. I really wanted to get a feel for how the parts fit. The entire thing is sitting at low torque..Ive decided to go in for a stretch gauge before exercising the new torque wrench i received for Christmas.

Perhaps the replacement shaft with triple row bearing from LN is not for sale anymore? Do recall not too many of those were being sold a year or two ago so it might be off the shelf.

Hope you had a good Christmas and got all the parts and tools you needed. Thanks for documenting this refresh/rebuild. If you have some spare time on your hands, here is another rebuild thread that you may like.


http://www.planet-9.com/987-cayman-boxster-service-tech/86847-engine-removal-question.html
__________________
What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law.

Last edited by rp17; 12-28-2014 at 07:39 AM.
rp17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2014, 08:34 PM   #5
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Lubrication has always been the problem.
Load has always been the problem.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page