02-10-2007, 12:01 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
drove my first american car today
So I wanted to drive a 'Vette. I went down to the dealership and they gave me no problems. Very nice service and nice people.
So let me start out w/ what I like:
- I love the power. It is great and the sound is so much different than my car. Very throaty sound.
- I love the clutch operation and mechanical feel. My car's clutch is hydraulically assisted so there is not much feel.
- Gains traction very quickly when flooring it in first.
- I love the crappy interior. Means the car is not weighed down by useless junk.
- Comfortable seating.
Now for what I am not sure about....
- I can't even tell what gear I'm in sometimes. The gears are so scrunched together on the H pad that 4th seems exactly like 6th and 5th seems exactly like 3rd. It was hard to pick what direction to move the shifter.
- Very hard to shift gears. Requires a big thrust from your wrists. Not necessarily a bad thing, but could definitely become a pain in the butt. Not sure, though.
- Everything is operated by a button or remote use. There's no key hole even and the e-brake is even operated by a button somewhere when parking! This is a minor detail I can deal with lol
- Low redline? Lol, joking. There really is nothing else I dislike about the car. It's great.
I didn't get a chance to test the brakes. The brakes on my car are phenomenal, probably some of the best brakes in a production car.
I didn't get a chance to test the handling at all. I have no clue how it handles. I don't track or anything YET, so it doesn't need to be superb. I expect it to handle a lot worse than my Boxster, but not so horribly that I can't rip turns a fast speeds.
At first I was thinking, "Hmmm, it doesn't feel THAT much faster than my car in low gear." My thoughts were quickly silenced when I got back into my car and tried the very same thing as I did in the 'Vette, and my car felt so damn slow. I couldn't believe how slow I felt. I realized my car is just a completely different animal.
The corvette humbled me.
I hope to own one of these babies some day soon. VROOOOOMMMM!!!!
I'm hungry for some good old American BEEF
What are your thoughts?
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 01:16 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,510
|
o yea, well its pretty much a production drag car, it hauls ass, wher the boxster has none of that, so if someone is looking to ro and rape all the ricers in something, this wold be a very good choice, and hp/$ upgrades are pretty much free compared to boxster, even thought its weird to even say that you need to upgrade a 500hp car, lol.
i had a 412hp car, and it was awesome, but i wuld slow down to a 15 to just take a turn, scary ****************, but off the line there nothing better than guttd american musle car.
glad u liked it,
__________________
http://i34.tinypic.com/157yslk.jpg
"I couldn't find the sports car of my dreams, so I built it myself." ~F. Porsche
Gemballa springs::litronics::Eurotech 18s(275/225)::B&M::MOMO wheel::
exhaust cutouts::EVOcoldair intake::OEM smoked tails & sidemarkers::
colormatched bumperettes::Top Speed Pro-1 exhaust::
my cardomain/pictures page
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 01:42 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: or
Posts: 99
|
I was at the Portland car show a few weeks ago and, as always, looking for the next dream car. I sat in a corvette and it had a feel of excitement that I didn't get from anything else there. I had a '67 vette in the 70's and it was fine, but I've not been a big fan of Chevy's since then. Just sitting in the vette made me think I could try it again. From everything I've read the new vette is no slouch in the handling department either. The Consumer Reports article on dream cars gave the 911 top honors, but the vette was very close, and much cheaper.
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 02:06 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
|
Hi,
I think the C6 and especially the Z06 are World Class. Lots of import guys still won't give them the respect they truly deserve though...
Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 03:10 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
The C6 has so much torque it pretty much doesn't matter what gear you are in.
Anyway, the 6 speed click shifter is the bomb. I would buy that if I were in the market over rowing the gears.
Great car, great price.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 04:26 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Bavarian, was it a C6? Your post didn't say. I'm guessing it was from your post since C5's can be bought for next to nothing these days. I have to echo what Bruce says about the torque, it just goes no matter what gear you are in. I spent about 10hrs of seat time behind the wheel of a 05 C6 and it was fun but I'm still keeping the boxster S. I must say I liked the power though...plus it had a better shift feel than my boxster.
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 05:47 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djomlas
o yea, well its pretty much a production drag car, it hauls ass, wher the boxster has none of that, so if someone is looking to ro and rape all the ricers in something, this wold be a very good choice,
|
I've spent a bit of time in C5 and C5 Z06 cars. Obviously both cars are significantly faster in a straight line than a Boxster or Boxster S.
But they will also positively rape a Boxster around an autocross course or open track. The suspension on C5s and C6s is fully adjustable front and rear for camber. They don't require a lot of static camber to handle well, because the suspension was properly designed to have an excellent camber curve (you can't say that about a Boxster). The ride height is adjustable from the factory. The cars are set up very well for track and autocross work, right out of the box. In fact, the factory goes so far as to recommend alignment settings for track, autocross, and street. Pretty cool.
The C5 is a car that initially feels very large, but its quick steering, fast responses and forgiving nature make it feel much smaller and immediately inspire confidence. Once moving quickly, they feel light, small and nimble. A C5 Z06 is only 3050lbs, pretty close to a Boxster S weight (mine is 3000lbs on the nose, 2960 with the fancy wheels). They are fantastic handling cars.
The one area where they are really lacking is in handling FEEL. Somehow Chevy hasn't found a way to acheive the wonderful steering feel and chassis feedback of a Boxster. Supposedly, the C6 was a step in the wrong direction in this regard, but again I haven't driven one.
If they can fix that for the C7 and keep the weight in check, it will be my next car. If I hadn't bought my Boxster for competition purposes, I'd own a C6.
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 06:13 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
my two cents:
apples and oranges really...
for the track I'll take a c6 or zo6 over any Porsche any day of the week.
But we don't live on the track do we?
The peformance of the car is world class as proven in Sports Car racing but the styling and wheels are still disappointing and stuck in the 90's. The performance to match any Ferrari yet it looks inferior when parked next to a F430 or 360.
The interior of the Z06 is vastly better and I actually prefer it to the newer stuff from Porsche but c6 still needs lots of work. It still screams 'rental car'. And not to mention the "gold chain" driver stigma.
Ford was able to make the Ford GT look truly exotic so it is possible in America. Can't understand why Chevy still can't get it right. I'd be pissed if I were an engineer over there. All that work to make it perform and the design guys are five steps behind.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 06:16 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
The interior of the C6 isn't the best, but IMO it's as nice or nicer than a base 986 interior in terms of fit, finish and quality of materials. As far as stying goes, I think the C6 is positively beautiful. I don't like the fit of the headlights the best, but the rest of the look is clean and purposeful.
Of course it's not going to look as exotic as a Ford GT or a Ferrari. Would you pay $60k-$120k to upgrade your Corvette interior to that of a GT or an F430 if you still had a Corvette afterwards? $60k is about the price differential between a C6 and a GT. The Corvette is built to a price, and the money goes into the stuff that matters - the chassis and drivetrain.
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 10:15 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
The interior of the C6 isn't the best, but IMO it's as nice or nicer than a base 986 interior in terms of fit, finish and quality of materials. As far as stying goes, I think the C6 is positively beautiful. I don't like the fit of the headlights the best, but the rest of the look is clean and purposeful.
Of course it's not going to look as exotic as a Ford GT or a Ferrari. Would you pay $60k-$120k to upgrade your Corvette interior to that of a GT or an F430 if you still had a Corvette afterwards? $60k is about the price differential between a C6 and a GT. The Corvette is built to a price, and the money goes into the stuff that matters - the chassis and drivetrain. 
|
well I was referring more to the more important exterior styling than the interior.
but...
I don't think the C6 or Z06 even looks like a $60K car let alone $120K.
To me both look like a $40K car, Tops. Its looks aren't bad but sooo bland.
The wheels look like they came out of the wheels section of the Sears Auto Store.
There is nothing on the car that would make it memorable. 100% Vanilla.
Do you know how many people have stopped me and thought my car looked like a $70K car? They couldn't believe me when I told them that you could find a very similar one for under $30K.
The styling on the C6 and ZO6 are really no different, you would have to look closely to tell them apart.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 05:58 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
I don't like the fit of the headlights the best, but the rest of the look is clean and purposeful.
|
I also read the the headlights were the result of time lost during the 24 hrs of LeMans while driving with headlights. I think it was 2003. The C-5 won, but lost a lot of time due to increased drag of the flip up head lights. The race team complained, and Chevy responded.
I love the lights of the C-6. In fact, if the C-5 had the lights of the C-6, I would have bought one instead of my Boxster.
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 08:34 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,052
|
I've driven my friend's C6 (also has a Borla exhaust on it) a few times. It's a VERY different experience from my car.
Big power, but I missed revving the engine--you never need to get over 2000 RPMs in the Vette really. Hell, the thing will idle up a hill in fourth gear!
Hate the cheap interior and all the squeaks and rattles he's got, and the clutch took a while to get used to (and I'm pretty sure that all clutches are hydraulically-assisted these days--the C6 just has a heavier pressure plate than the Boxster probably, and for good reason). The C6 also feels a lot bigger when you're driving it, even though it's really not a big car at all.
He has a big problem with the gear box though. If he tries to shift into third gear quickly, often times the car ends up in a half-engaged state. It's a common report among C6 owners apparently.
Not the car for me, but I love the way it looks and damn, that's a fast car!
Oh, and I'm not diggin' his headless-dwarf steering wheel:
 But GM's already fixed that issue.
Last edited by eslai; 02-13-2007 at 08:39 PM.
|
|
|
02-14-2007, 04:56 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 701
|
[QUOTE=eslai]
sweet, looks like he got the chevy blazer steering wheel package
yeah, not that big of a fan of the interior or lack of pop up head lights....
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 06:28 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
The one area where they are really lacking is in handling FEEL. Somehow Chevy hasn't found a way to acheive the wonderful steering feel and chassis feedback of a Boxster. Supposedly, the C6 was a step in the wrong direction in this regard, but again I haven't driven one.
|
...and, to me, FEEL is mostly what matters when I take my Box top-down in the twisties.
Z.
|
|
|
02-14-2007, 07:20 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
I've spent a bit of time in C5 and C5 Z06 cars. Obviously both cars are significantly faster in a straight line than a Boxster or Boxster S.
But they will also positively rape a Boxster around an autocross course or open track.
|
i disagree. i have a BASE boxster w/ M030 and i passed both C5's that were with us on a trip to Talladega grand prix. my lap times were a lot better. these were decent drivers. a C5 might be able to 'rape' a boxster on an autoX or tight track with a HERO behind the wheel, but even seasoned drivers will find it tough to beat a box in autoX or on a tight track. open up the track a bit and obviously the horsepower wins.
|
|
|
02-14-2007, 09:45 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
i disagree. i have a BASE boxster w/ M030 and i passed both C5's that were with us on a trip to Talladega grand prix. my lap times were a lot better. these were decent drivers. a C5 might be able to 'rape' a boxster on an autoX or tight track with a HERO behind the wheel, but even seasoned drivers will find it tough to beat a box in autoX or on a tight track. open up the track a bit and obviously the horsepower wins.
|
You encountered some less than stellar drivers, or your car was better set up (tires, etc) than their cars were.
SCCA autocross classes all 986s in A Stock and all C5s in Super Stock. The C5 Z06 has been the car to have in Super Stock for many years. The 986 used to be in the same class as the C5, but it was moved down a couple of years ago because it realistically has no chance against those cars.
Last edited by John V; 02-14-2007 at 09:48 AM.
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 05:44 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 502
|
I have never driven a C6 but I drove my cousin's C5 and compared to my Boxster it's a bomb, I like it a lot but it's not the same feel as a boxster I just feel more connected to the road in my Boxster. I read a lot of reviews about the C6 Vette and as per MNBOXSTER'S quote it doesn't get the respect it deserves. Compared to some high end european cars I think it's one hell of a bargain.
__________________
1997 Porsche Boxster manual
2018 Subaru WRX Sport Tech
2014 Honda CRV
2014 Mercedes Benz 350 ML
2015 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray manual
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 06:30 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Actually, the C6 is not that heavy. Feels big next to a Boxster but actually quite agile.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 06:32 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Corvette C6 is about 200lbs more than Boxster I believe.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-10-2007, 09:34 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Sorry guys.
Yes it was a c6.
I believe 987 Boxster S brakes are slightly better than the Vette brakes, 107 ft from 60-0 as opposed to 110. Both very good.
The standard c6 uses an old fashioned leaf spring suspension, but there are 3 different suspension options, one of which is the z51 which also upgrades the brakes so I hear.
The Boxster and C6 are different animals. It certainly does not have that roadster feel to it. You know, the agility and confinement all in one.
I feel that I identify w/ both cars in a way. I enjoy massive power which, in any other car, would come at an extremely high price tag, but I love the refinement and precision of my Boxster.
To get both of these in one, I'd probably have to spend 100k+ on a European exotic.
But what if... I got a c6 and put a few thousand into suspension mods. Then a few thousand into bolt-ons and I have a Ferrari 360 at my fingertips.
I am really wanting one of these. The Boxster is a lease, so I'm stuck w/ it (not that that's a bad thing) but I am still going to buy one of these.
I'm still slightly torn between the vette and the elise. I prefer the elise but my dad and stepmother think it's too dangerous... Gotta hate parents sometimes.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 PM.
| |