01-17-2019, 07:51 AM
|
#1
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC-986
|
I like it, but still uncertain to me if it'll collapse under vacuum, the way my first one did. But being silicone is a plus, for sure.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 08:07 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,029
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC-986
|
In my experience only the steel wire reinforced tubing will withstand the vacuum in this diameter. The smaller vacuum lines can be thick wall silicone without collapsing but not the large ones we are discussing.
It will be great if the hose shown stays clear colored and does not become brittle. The silicone equivalent is expensive in clear and difficult to find.
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 10:19 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 1,476
|
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 12:14 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,029
|
I'm skeptical about the ECS system linked above because many catch can systems have been tried for the M96 and none work correctly - so far. The generic ECS catch can seems much the same as other systems.
The limiting factor on the M96 is reputed to be the low tension oil control rings if you read this and other threads.
Aos
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 12:41 PM
|
#5
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
The ECS (and several other) catch-can setups have provisions to "vent" back to vacuum, so I don't think the rings are the problem. As I see it, we're introducing volume to the system, but once initial vacuum is built, the added volume is not likely a problem. (I say "not likely" because I haven't tried it myself. there is theoretically a potential for the additional time required to regulate changes in vacuum in the larger volume to create a lag under part-throttle situations?)
For me, the problem with this catch-can is that I couldn't find anyplace to mount it, except in the trunk, and I don't want to do that to my street car.
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 03:09 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dahlonega , Georgia
Posts: 1,361
|
Why does the catch can have to be mounted in the engine bay or trunk ? Is there enough space down by the transmission ? A hose could extend from the AOS down to the catch can then up to the manifold . This would create a loop of hose plus the can plus the OEM AOS . Crazy idea ?
__________________
2002 Boxster S Arctic Silver with black top with glass window and black leather interior. Jake Raby 3.6 SS ( the beast ) with IMS Solution. 996 GT3 front bumper , GT3 rocker covers and GT3TEK rear diffuser and Joe Toth composites rear ducktail spoiler .
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 05:44 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfuerst911sc
Why does the catch can have to be mounted in the engine, Is there enough space down by the transmission ? Crazy idea ?
|
I could think of a place or two, around the transmission where you could mount a catch can if you want/need..
|
|
|
01-17-2019, 12:37 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,135
|
you can simply run a catch can inline with the hose to the intake manifold. You won't remove ALL the oil, but it may save you if you have a dramatic AOS failure.
|
|
|
01-18-2019, 10:56 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,135
|
crazy no, but finding relatively inexpensive oil resistant hose in that size is relatively tricky.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 AM.
| |