Not me - you want a Porsche, you gotta pay the freight. They are expensive as h3ll and I've only driven mine 40 miles. Best drive I've ever had. If it blows up tomorrow I'll pop in a new engine - no questions asked.

Interesting that you've also noted the smoother running and you continue to. We hear that over and over again post IMS Solution install and there's a reason for it. Every time that we mention this people say its BS because there's no way that the bearing design change could lead to this. Those who have experienced it aren't making it up.

Some people like to solve a problem, others like to apply a less permanent fix, because of that we offer 3 products with 3 different service lives and price points. Others only offer one, and most of them didn't even design it themselves.

That feeling of a smoother running motor makes sense to me. That whole area spinning all that chain should tighten up, the IMS would be more stable, especially if the car had lots of miles.
Why couldn't those Germans have thought of that?
Or was that the influence of Toyota engineers?

German engineering VS: American Ingenuity

Ain't America Great

They did... Back in the mid 1950's and kept the design through all aircooled flat 6 engines with no deviation. The design continued in the Mezger flat 6 based GT3 and Turbo engines until 2013.

The very first night I took apart an M96 engine, knowing nothing about it, I invented the IMS Solution. Why? because it made sense.

Can't be done, certainly not in any logical, justifiable or quantitative way.
As Jake points out, Porsche swayed from previous, proven engineering. This opened Pandora's Box. With hard work and business risks, corrective solutions were developed and options now exist. They aren't cheap when one looks at it from the perspective of a $10-$15k, decade+ old car.
Keep in mind that there are a lot of these cars out there, running fine into high miles. So there is still a lot of excellent engineer in these cars.

But sit in one, turn the key, row through the gears, kick it up near the red line
I did. I can't wait to go for a drive again

There you go - No need to talk anymore - Talk is cheap anyhow

Glad to hear that everyone is satisified with the Solution. I have a Solution install scheduled next month.

The only two (probably dumb) questions that I have over the new "Double Row Pro" are:

1. "IF," and I know that it is a big IF, the oil line from the filter to the plain bearing should be severed, what would be the result? Would you know soon enough from the oil pressure gauge in the car (would it drop instantly to 0?) to swiftly turn off the engine or would that not work since you are taking a small amount of oil from the filter adapter and the pressure would not be affected?

Is there any application where the Double Row Pro could be a better choice?

2. Once you go IMS Solution, can you ever go back to a bearing? (not sure you would ever want to do that)...

Trust that ANY event that would lead to this would create serious damage otherwise and you'd probably not have an engine left. The oil line is tucked tightly against the bottom of the engine and is far from the lowest point. That said, I am building a C4 996 into a Rally car just to prove that this line and position will take the most harsh off road environments possible, with no additional protection over whats offered in stock form.

What would be the result if the line did fail? Well, you'd take advantage of the fail safe designed into the arrangement. We have forced these failures and know what happens, and the result has not been total engine loss to date when we did these tests.

It does not drop to zero, as the volume loss from the hose is not significant enough to create a total loss of OP. You will lose 1-1.5 bar of pressure and unless the engine is ran out of oil the rest of the engine does not suffer from this event. I know because I have done this purposely.

If you are quick on the draw you can shut it down and be fine. For those worried about this we have designed an auxiliary oil pressure indicator light that installs with a pressure switch in the line and can be used to indicate a loss of OP to the IMS Solution. We have never sold a kit, because its never been an issue with a buyer. I used this arrangement during testing to feed OP values to my data logger as live pressure that the IMS Solution was seeing.

I developed both of them, and the only benefit that the Single Row Pro has is reduced cost. This is the only reason we released the Single Row Pro, to be a stronger arrangement than the Classic Single Row, but have a mid price point.

Absolutely you can! In fact we did this during testing when evaluating an OEM single row, Classic Single Row, Single Row Pro and IMS Solution against each other from a MPG, BSFC and HP/ TQ point of view, all back to back and all in the same engine. We installed three of the technologies in a single day, back to back to back and the results were so unbelievable that I'd dare not post them, else people would think that we were making it all up.

My Faultless Tool installs and extracts all IMSB technologies that we have developed to date. No worries.

Thanks for the reply Jake! I figured you had all of the bases covered and tested.