Quote:
Originally Posted by eli cash
Damage was front right and back left. So it does not sound like a simple fender bender. I'm imagining a weird 2-part skidding wreck.
I want this car to be my DD, so low miles are pretty valuable to me. My feeling is that a crash is something I could work with, but if it is problematic to the alignment then that's not good.
Sounds like a PPI could sort this out. Like I said, I think I'd prefer a low miles/crash history car to a high miles/no crash car. Does that make sense, or sound like a good plan?
|
low mileage is not that great on Boxsters. When these cars sit awhile it can cause the dreaded IMS problem
IMS Failures Explained | IMS Retrofit
It's better to have a 986 with 70,000+ mileage because the thinking is it's likely been driven regularly and usually IMS occurs on low mileage vehicles.
__________________
2006 987 2.7 manual silver/black, PASM, OEM drilled rotors, heated seats
1998 986 2.5 manual black/tan with bad engine = SOLD
|
Boxster
2006 Porsche Boxster 987
Threaded Mode
