Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2013, 05:45 PM   #21
Registered User
 
Dr.Strangepork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap View Post
Yes, do not drive a 981 S, particluarly with SPort Chrono in Sport Plus(?) mode on a bit of road with long runs and tight turns.
It's terrible. I mean you'll just hate it. It's like driving a old lady's car.
Oh thank goodness. Guess I need not lust after one anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overdrive View Post
I'm waiting for them to drop their jack-of-all-trades 2.0T into a Porsche vehicle (likely the baby Boxster everyone keeps yapping about)
A 2.0T in a small Porsche platform would be a modders dream come true. The aftermarket support for the 2.0T is ridiculous and the engine is built to take lots and lots of boost straight from the factory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sub5kvm View Post
981 vs Toyota MR2 Spyder - Spot the Difference!

Well, that's one way to look at it, but the way I see it:





Dr.Strangepork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 04:14 AM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 598
How I learned to love the 981!

Last night a 26 year old friend of my son was at our house, saw my 986 Boxster in the driveway and exclaimed, "Wow, that's one of the original Boxsters, isn't it?" Well, yes. "How old is it?" She'll be 14 years old in August. "Looks incredible!" Well, that's it then. I don't have to care if the 981 has better acceleration, a higher top speed, better handling, braking and ergonomics, because mine is a classic!

I know, in most States in the US a car has to be 20 years old to get a classic car registration and plates (although the first Boxsters will be getting there in only three years), but still... As I see it, when the 987 came out, the 986 was relegated to being nothing more than a used Porsche - the previous model. Now that the 981 has arrived, the 986 Boxster has become not simply a used car, but the 'original' Boxster. The one that started the line - and unlike the 914, 924, 944 and 928, I say line as I fully expect the Porsche 'Boxster', like the 911, to carry on for a very long time. So in a sense, the introduction of the 981 and its more modern (if less unique) design has allowed us to move past the used car label, into the classic car one. And for that, I have learned to love the 981 and its electronic power steering, electronic emergency brake activation, optional vector control, non-unique styling, etc., etc.

Brad

Last edited by southernstar; 04-23-2013 at 04:15 AM. Reason: sp
southernstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 04:24 AM   #23
2001 Boxster S
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by southernstar View Post
Last night a 26 year old friend of my son was at our house, saw my 986 Boxster in the driveway and exclaimed, "Wow, that's one of the original Boxsters, isn't it?" Well, yes. "How old is it?" She'll be 14 years old in August. "Looks incredible!" Well, that's it then. I don't have to care if the 981 has better acceleration, a higher top speed, better handling, braking and ergonomics, because mine is a classic!

I know, in most States in the US a car has to be 20 years old to get a classic car registration and plates (although the first Boxsters will be getting there in only three years), but still... As I see it, when the 987 came out, the 986 was relegated to being nothing more than a used Porsche - the previous model. Now that the 981 has arrived, the 986 Boxster has become not simply a used car, but the 'original' Boxster. The one that started the line - and unlike the 914, 924, 944 and 928, I say line as I fully expect the Porsche 'Boxster', like the 911, to carry on for a very long time. So in a sense, the introduction of the 981 and its more modern (if less unique) design has allowed us to move past the used car label, into the classic car one. And for that, I have learned to love the 981 and its electronic power steering, electronic emergency brake activation, optional vector control, non-unique styling, etc., etc.

Brad
+1 here!

The more newer models they introduce, the more nostalgia points our 986s earn!
__________________
2001 Boxster S
Arctic Silver
'Brenda' aka Money Trap aka 100% Fun!
Dgnarvs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 05:54 AM   #24
Registered User
 
Coffinhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hernando Beach, Florida
Posts: 444
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dgnarvs View Post
+1 here!

The more newer models they introduce, the more nostalgia points our 986s earn!
Maybe it is because I own one, but I prefer the looks of the 986 over the 981.

986


987


981



I know the 981 is a couple inches longer, but it looks squatier (?) to me. Like I said, maybe I am biased becasue I have a 986.
__________________
2003 Boxster S, 6-spd, Seal Grey/Grey top


Ka is a wheel, and everything is 19
Coffinhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 09:00 AM   #25
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffinhunter View Post
Maybe it is because I own one, but I prefer the looks of the 986 over the 981.

I know the 981 is a couple inches longer, but it looks squatier (?) to me. Like I said, maybe I am biased becasue I have a 986.
using your pic, my 13 year old car (or 20 year old concept design) is aging quiet well when compared to the current car.

I have to wonder if the 981 will look as current when the 2033 Boxster is parked next to it some day.


__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 09:37 AM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 598
Coffinhunter, I also think that the 986 is a more original and cohesive design, although I believe that the 981 is a much more modern design (as expected), and one that is very attractive in its own right. The 986 makes consistent use of 'modifed C', or 'half-oval' shapes throughout the design. From the front:
- the shape of the front air intakes
- the profile of the side mirrors
- the shape of the instrument cover (and the opening)
- the shape of the headrests
- the shape of the roll bars
- even the shape of the much maligned 'fried egg', lower amber portion of the headlights.
From the side:
- the overall body shape - sloping down front and rear
- the shape of the side windows
- the shape of the top
- the shape of the side air intakes
- in the optional 17 inch Boxster design wheels, in the slots between the spokes
- the shape of the front side-marker light
- the side profile of the tailights
- the shape of the door handles
From the rear:
- the shape of the rear bumperettes
- the shape of the rear central deck light
- the shape of the tailights.
- in the base Boxster, the shape of exhaust tip

These same shapes are also carried into the interior. Simply put, rather than being a mix of angular and rounded shapes, the design elements remain balanced, consistent and cohesive throughout. It also carries a strong family resemblance to the first mid-engined Porsche (apart from the prototype 356), the famous 550 Spyder. This is something that became less pronounced in the 987 and which is virtually absent from the 981. While others have already pointed out the similarity of the 981 to some other mid-engined sports car designs, one cannot confuse the 986 with any other car. Dated or not, it is immediately recognizable as a Porsche and no other car. And to me, that is no bad thing!

However, as to which car looks more aggressive (some would say masculine)? I would say the 981. Which looks faster when it is standing still? The 981. Which looks state of the art in 2013? The 981. In sum, the 981 is an attracitve, aggressive-looking, state of the art design for a mid-engined sports car.
A job well-done. But the 986 is also an attractive, balanced and original design - and one with historical elements that are uniquely Porsche.

Brad
southernstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 11:15 AM   #27
Registered User
 
BruceH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 2,708
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffinhunter View Post
Maybe it is because I own one, but I prefer the looks of the 986 over the 981.

986
Still a pretty timeless design. I never get tired of looking at 986's. The 987's and now the 981 are nice, but there is just something about the earlier models that draws me in. When people see it either in person or in a picture, they always comment "that's a beautiful car!"
__________________
______________________________________________
2001 Boxster S Lapis Blue
TS Cat Bypass Pipes and exhaust
iPad Mini Dash Install
DEPO Tail Lights
BruceH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 11:23 AM   #28
Registered User
 
Dr.Strangepork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceH View Post
Still a pretty timeless design. I never get tired of looking at 986's. The 987's and now the 981 are nice, but there is just something about the earlier models that draws me in. When people see it either in person or in a picture, they always comment "that's a beautiful car!"
It's really hard to believe that car came out in 1997. Back then, this is what its competition looked like:



Today, the SLK looks really dated to me, but not the Box.
Dr.Strangepork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 03:01 PM   #29
Opposed to Subie Burble
 
Overdrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central CT
Posts: 1,197
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by southernstar View Post
I know, in most States in the US a car has to be 20 years old to get a classic car registration and plates (although the first Boxsters will be getting there in only three years), but still....
I was sitting here doing the math in my head: "Now hang on just a minute! Three years? I thought my car was 15 years old being a mid-97 build and all...k, subtract that, carry the 2, adjacent over hypotenuse...oh, hey, he's right! My car's gonna be 16 in a couple months! Woohoo!"
:dance:
Don't mind me, I've been staring at numbers and all sorts of files all day and my mind is shot, totally wrong time to be doing any sort of math.
__________________
-O/D

1997 Arctic Silver Boxster, 5-spd
IMSR + RMS
Robbins glass window top
Overdrive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 03:12 PM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Strangepork View Post
It's really hard to believe that car came out in 1997. Back then, this is what its competition looked like:



Today, the SLK looks really dated to me, but not the Box.
I actually think the original SLK is similar to the 986 Box in the sense that it too is simpler, purer and cleaner than the fussy cars that have followed it.

The SLK isn't as nice a design as the 986, but I don't think it's as bad as you suggest.

Generally I think the 986 has aged well because it's such a clean, unadorned design. There's not a huge amount to date. Parts of the 987's design are very fussy and have dated badly.

The 981 is pretty fussy too, so I suspect it will date fairly quickly.

There are of course always exceptions. The original Z4 is a very busy design, but for me it's aging very, very well. Still looks exceptionally fresh - arguably looks fresher than it's rather bland successor.
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 04:29 PM   #31
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
I like the 981's styling. But I like the 991's styling better
RandallNeighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 08:24 AM   #32
Registered User
 
Porsche Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 560
I think the ginourmous wheels on the 981 make it look squatty.

I do like the look of the 981, but it's so close to my 987.2, I can't justify the extra $$.

Well, not yet anyway . . .

What I REALLY want is the GT3
__________________
2009 Porsche Boxster - Guards Red/Tan
Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… that’s what gets you. – Jeremy Clarkson
Porsche Chick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 02:06 PM   #33
2006 987
 
986_inquiry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: st. louis
Posts: 443
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcomet View Post
I got to do a quick drive in a 981 today. I sadly didn't really focus on much speed as the sales person was yacking away and there was traffic. I did get to play with PDK (definitely prefer MT still) and the steering... the latter electronic steering felt totally dead to me compared to the 986. I am used to elec steering on my 2008 Scion xD. (which is similar). Still it was surprising to me how much I noticed it. Overall the car feels bigger and more luxurious...and less raw. Looks amazing, but I was less impressed than I thought at least initially. Anyone else have this experience?
that is exactly how I feel about my 987, that the 986 was smaller, less luxurious and more raw

and..... i hate to say this.... hope i don't get flamed... but... the 2.5 986 is.... faster? I know, it shouldn't be, but it is, my 200 hp 2.5 feels faster than the 245hp 2006 2.7, at least in 3rd gear from 60 up. They changed the gearing, from 2000 986 on, 3rd use to go from 62 to ~93mph, now it goes from about 65 to ~103mph, approximate because I would never travel at those speeds. The 2000+ 2.7s I test drove were even slower, so if you're gonna get one, get a 2.5 or 987 or S, of course.

not only that but the 2.5 got the same gas mileage, if not a bit better, and I spend far more time staring at the mpg now since I have a mpg trip computer and the 2.5 didn't.

Ok, flame me, i'm sorry, it's my opinion only
986_inquiry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 02:24 PM   #34
2006 987
 
986_inquiry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: st. louis
Posts: 443
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by sub5kvm View Post
981 vs Toyota MR2 Spyder - Spot the Difference!



Yes that's right. The 981 is the one with the red seats!

Joking aside I do find myself double take when I catch one of the Spyder's drive by, thinking i might be missing out on getting a glimpse of a 981.. but sadly not.

I think its the headlights or something..

My local Porsche dealer has offered me a test drive in the new Cayman, following the launch event i attended back in March... going to see if I can get a drive in a 981 while I'm there too!

Probably the only time I'll ever get to drive one!


yes i have to do a double take too when a mr2 drives by. Even worse if it's modded


Fortunately they're rare and the back looks very old and dated compared to the boxster


surprised Porsche didn't sue them considering it was a blatant rip-off, but maybe that's what Toyota was hoping for? "We look so similar Porsche is suing us!" Common back then, kind of like Hyundai Tiburon ripping off Ferrari
456 vs the Hyundia Tiburon - Ferrari Life
986_inquiry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 03:14 PM   #35
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by 986_inquiry View Post
that is exactly how I feel about my 987, that the 986 was smaller, less luxurious and more raw

and..... i hate to say this.... hope i don't get flamed... but... the 2.5 986 is.... faster? I know, it shouldn't be, but it is, my 200 hp 2.5 feels faster than the 245hp 2006 2.7, at least in 3rd gear from 60 up. They changed the gearing, from 2000 986 on, 3rd use to go from 62 to ~93mph, now it goes from about 65 to ~103mph, approximate because I would never travel at those speeds. The 2000+ 2.7s I test drove were even slower, so if you're gonna get one, get a 2.5 or 987 or S, of course.

not only that but the 2.5 got the same gas mileage, if not a bit better, and I spend far more time staring at the mpg now since I have a mpg trip computer and the 2.5 didn't.

Ok, flame me, i'm sorry, it's my opinion only

I've been thinking lately that the perfect 986 could be a 2.7 with the transmission from the 2.5 fitted. So you get the proper benefit of the 2.7 without it being compromised by the longer gearing.

Then you have the 2.7, which is pretty robust as these engines go (ideally an early 2.7 with double-row IMS), it'll be a bit cheaper to run (smaller brakes etc, cheaper insurance), it looks that bit cleaner and purer without the central air intake.

It'll be plenty quick enough and with the 2.5's gear ratios it should be nice and revvy.
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 10:46 AM   #36
Registered User
 
sub5kvm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap View Post
using your pic, my 13 year old car (or 20 year old concept design) is aging quiet well when compared to the current car.

I have to wonder if the 981 will look as current when the 2033 Boxster is parked next to it some day.


Nice wheels!
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Boxster S Facelift
sub5kvm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 10:56 AM   #37
Registered User
 
Dino944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: RI
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by sub5kvm View Post
981 vs Toyota MR2 Spyder - Spot the Difference!



Yes that's right. The 981 is the one with the red seats!

Joking aside I do find myself double take when I catch one of the Spyder's drive by, thinking i might be missing out on getting a glimpse of a 981.. but sadly not.

I think its the headlights or something..

My local Porsche dealer has offered me a test drive in the new Cayman, following the launch event i attended back in March... going to see if I can get a drive in a 981 while I'm there too!

Probably the only time I'll ever get to drive one!

Yes, the headlights do throw me off a bit. According to an article I read on the 981 they are supposed to remind us of the stacked headlights of a 917.

Still in person and in the drivers seat you won't mistaken it for an MR2.
__________________
2014 981 Cayman S
2003 MB 320 Sport 4matic
1989 328GTS
Dino944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 08:46 PM   #38
Registered User
 
mcomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 271
I've been following all the replies. While there my be some similarities between the 981 and other cars, trust me I don't think they will ever be mistaken when seen in the flesh. I'm still mulling over all the options and plan to test drive the new cayman again this weekend along with perhaps a 911. I've also been looking at an Audi R8 V8 but that might be too much of a stretch especially pre owned with little or no warranty ...

I think our 986's are still stunning. I literally had a guy raising his hands and yelling over to me "nice car man, nice car!" As I drove around the corner from work the other day. Hehe. And definitely the classic Porsche curves and feel is probably stronger in these earlier cars. Still undecided for now...
__________________
Michael Comet - www.comet-cartoons.com
2014 Guards Red Cayman S - PSE - PASM - 20"CC - INFTMT - CONV - etc..etc...
SOLD - 2003 Speed Yellow Porsche Boxster S - LNE IMS - Klisstle Rollbar Cover

Last edited by mcomet; 04-28-2013 at 09:00 PM.
mcomet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2013, 07:55 AM   #39
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern New jersey
Posts: 1,054
Now that I've seen a few 981's in person, the exterior is not the drastic change it seems to be in these pictures. It looks like an updated 987, the side vents don't stand out as much as you would think. Just my 2¢
stephen wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2013, 09:31 AM   #40
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 598
Especially from the rear, I just don't get the 1999-2007 MR2 versus 981 comparisons. Yes, both are mid-engined 'spyders' and consequently there are bound to be a number of similarites in terms of overall design and packaging. But the 981 has much more rounded (and to my eye, attractive) lines to the front air intakes, front shape of the hood, headlights, wheel arches, side air intakes and especially, rear fender/tail light forms.

Yes the MR2 weighs much less, but it is also a smaller car both in real-lfe appearance and in dimensions. For example, the MR2 has a width of 66.7 versus 70.1 inches (which carries over into interior width/elbow room/increased comfort as well as better handling). The length of the MR2 is 153 versus 171 inches and this contributes again to greater interior room, but also greater trunk space. Finally, the Toyota had a buzzy 1.8 L4 while the 981 has a 2.7 H6 (with not only better acceleration and top speed, but much less vibration and much more glorious exhaust notes).

Frankly, I thought the previous iteration of the MR2 was much more attractive than the final one which, to my eyes, looked small and boxy. Regardless, I am pretty confident that no one is going to confuse the MR2 with the 981 up close.

Brad


Last edited by southernstar; 04-29-2013 at 09:32 AM. Reason: sp
southernstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page