Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2005, 07:00 PM   #21
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,889
I am not going to study all the messages.

The question was from a 987 owner.

There are now 7 ranges, at least with the 997.

Tool Pants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 07:11 PM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 201
When we say life or premature here are we talking in Miles, RPM's, or Years.


I think everyone is using a different yardstick for engine life.

Miles, hours, revolutions, years,?

You could also take into account engine acceleration. Is bouncing off the rev limiter in fifth different than bouncing it in first or nuetral?


What I don't know is what happens to an engine when you stall it. This has to happen at a much higher rate than rev limiter bounces.
__________________
2004 Boxster - Carmon Red/ Black-SOLD
18" Carrera Lt, Painted to match roll bars, PnP Rear Speakers, Sports Tailpipe
2004 Tonka Truck H2

05 S - looking...
lexuspilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 07:47 PM   #23
Registered User
 
Rail26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,147
Wow, really stirred up the pot on that one! I usually don't go above 5000rpm on a consistent basis because I'm not sure what Porsche considers "warranty voiding". Quite honestly, I'm worried what type of driving may ward the warranty. Call me a wuss, but I couldn't and wouldn't want to rebuild the engine because the warranty is no longer valid. I bounced on the rev limiter once...hope that doesn't screw me in the end.
__________________
'05 987 Basalt Black/Sand Beige
5 spd, 18" wheels
AH-64 Apache
RC-12 Guardrail
RC-7 Crazy Hawk

"If the wings are traveling faster than
the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter--
and therefore, unsafe" --Unknown
Rail26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 07:55 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
No you will be fine.

The warranty only comes into play when there are many many hits and the service folks suspect racing and/or abuse.

Fun topic actually.

Thanks for the question!




Quote:
Originally Posted by Rail26
Wow, really stirred up the pot on that one! I usually don't go above 5000rpm on a consistent basis because I'm not sure what Porsche considers "warranty voiding". Quite honestly, I'm worried what type of driving may ward the warranty. Call me a wuss, but I couldn't and wouldn't want to rebuild the engine because the warranty is no longer valid. I bounced on the rev limiter once...hope that doesn't screw me in the end.
Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 08:34 PM   #25
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 201
Porsche has to expect this car to be driven like a sports car.

They have to protect themselves from abuse and ignorance; they shouldn't pay for missed downshifts etc.

But, there was a comment from Porsche in an article about manufacturers voiding warranties for DE days, lapping, track use, and even autocross. Seems Mistubishi owners that autox were finding their warranties voided. The Porsche comment said something like "We are not going to refuse coveredge for someone enjoying our product to the fullest, but you cannot expect us to finance someones racing season with warranty work." Now I am 95% sure it was Porsche 5% chance it was Ford. Subaru was bashed for also trolling autox results and voiding warranties.

I short shift some because I am cruising or just getting around but I rarely drive that I don't get on it through the gears. It just doesn't sound good until 5k.

My favorite thing about the base boxster is I can race around and it feels fast and sounds incredible, but I stay pretty legal.
__________________
2004 Boxster - Carmon Red/ Black-SOLD
18" Carrera Lt, Painted to match roll bars, PnP Rear Speakers, Sports Tailpipe
2004 Tonka Truck H2

05 S - looking...
lexuspilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 07:27 AM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
Lets try this.

Does racing a car lengthen or shorten its useful life?

Do you want to buy a car that has been raced?

Does racing involve high revs and tremendous internal stresses?

Does daily trips to the redline lengthen or shorten an engines useful life?

Do manufacturer's in general have a qarranty disclaimer for racing or other forms of abuse?

Hi,

Wait a minute here. You are carrying your examples to extremes to justify your arguments. NO ONE said anything about Racing. This was an example you brought up.

The Lister simply inquired about the Damage Potential of hitting the Rev Limiter ONE time. I said that this wasn't a problem and all of a sudden, we're talking about Racing and Warranty Claims.

Realize that Porsche has the ability to set the Rev Limiter to whatever Threshold they choose. This isn't some arbitrary number (although I would probably concede that there are more factors than merely Engine Preservation factored into their decision, such as the Marketing Potential of achieving certain Performance Parameters such as HP and Torque). I suspect that the Power Curve trails off at or just before RedLine. This means if you want to derive the maximum potential the car has to offer (and don't forget this is a Sports Car, driven largely by Enthusiasts) you're going to enter these Nether Reaches of the Tach. Porsche knows this too.

I further concede that I would not drive My car in a manner which hit the Limiter on every shift, or even every day (as you allude to), or week. But, when I'm out to take a Run or in any Competition, I want the car to Deliver the Goods, this means exceeding 6k Revs when appropriate.

I have developed a good deal of Mechanic Skill through the years and keep my cars in top shape. I have somewhat of a reputation among the Formula Vee crowd with whom I compete as having one of the most reliable cars, very few Mechanical Failures and DNFs by comparison to the rest of the field. Yet, I am one of the most Competitive and beat the P*ss out of the car on the Track. Where's your Cause and Effect here? As pointedly mentioned by another contributor, it's how you drive the car, over at what RPM range which will, to a great part, determine the car's longevity. I am smooth and very easy on my cars, despite pushing them to their limits. This is why they last. Most FV engines require a rebuild annually or every other season. Mine has averaged every 3-4 over the 14 years I've owned it. In large part, the Rules see to it that all the engines are basically the same, so how do you explain this if not for the effect of the Driver and proper maintenance?

Further, I realize that at some point in each of my cars that a rebuild will be necessary at some point, this is part of the Pkg. when owning Performance Cars longterm - you gotta Pay to Play. I try to hold that day off until absolutely necessary, but not if it means I have to drive like an Old Lady. If that's your point, those people would be much better off in a SunFire.

The 987S develops 276 bhp and 236 lb-ft of Torque respectively and this is often one of the arguments made to queeries about which model to buy - Base or 'S'. But, these numbers are only achieved at 6,200RPM and 4,700RPM respectively. If you are one of those guys who never exceeds 5k RPM, you're never gonna see this performance anyway, so buying the 'S' is a waste of time, if buying it solely for it's greater performance potential. On the other hand, a Base model driven to it's Max can realize more performance than the aforementioned 'S'.

Of course manufacturers build-in the Caveat of denying Warranty Claims against Racing or other Competition. Not usually because the cars can't take it, rather because all Drivers, or Owners are not the same. My cars are driven Hard, but, they are not abused. They are driven and maintained properly. Every car I've ever sold was sold for usually more than I paid for it, despite being very forthcoming to the Buyer about how the car was used. Their Test Drive, PPI, and complete Service Records (incl. every fill-up and Oil Change) tells them that the car is in excellent shape regardless of it's past use. Further, I have never had a Buyer come back to me with any complaints about a car I sold them. I have owned 43 cars in my life and currently own 5, so I've sold a few of them through the years.

So, to conclude, how you drive your car and maintain it is much more important in preserving it's life than an occaisional run to Red Line. If you want to keep bringing these extreme examples into the discussion, I suggest you start another thread on these topics, because they are not really germane to the discussion here. In that context, you may find that we're not so much in disagreement as you think.

Happy Motoring!...Jim'99

Last edited by MNBoxster; 09-21-2005 at 07:31 AM.
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 11:50 AM   #27
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
"So long as the engine is in good tune and overall good shape, and your oil & coolant levels are good, you can bounce off the Rev Limiter all day."

This was the one statement that I addressed. I think you made it.

My assertion is, if you "bounce off the Rev Limiter all day long" you are shortening your engine life.

I stand by that statement and I think any prudent, knowledgable person would.

Here is a test:

Next time you try to sell a car, tell the prospective buyer that you "bounce off the rev limiter all day long."

Tell him its OK though as you keep the oil clean and topped off and the coolant too!

See how many prospects end up walking away.

Off course, infrequent trips to Red Line are fine and I never said otherwise.

Keep bouncing the limiter if you want. Simply don't delude yourself that this is a cost free strategy.

As I indicated in one of my post, this issue was addressed in Panorama by the tech guy there. I think the article backs up my statements.

No one is attacking you, I simply think your assertion is not supported by fact.



Last edited by Brucelee; 09-21-2005 at 11:53 AM.
Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page