Why doesn't everyone drive a Boxster?

[healthservices]

It really depends on what you compare it to. I just got a sc430 I'm driving around and for everyday use I think I would pick it over the Boxster, better power, more torque, better stereo, better everyday seating, Hardtop is quite when up.

But if I'm going into the canyons I think I would take the Boxster, but not sure as I don't know how well the sc handles yet.

[milliemax]

Last weekend with the top down at a red light a Miata? owner yelled over to me and said "When my car grows up it will be a Porsche !!'' Then drove away and gave me a thumbs up !!. I am glad that I bought this car. Nothing is perfect and every repair garage is full of all kinds of broken cars. As long as it runs, I am in love.

[986_inquiry]

Originally Posted by healthservices

It really depends on what you compare it to. I just got a sc430 I'm driving around and for everyday use I think I would pick it over the Boxster, better power, more torque, better stereo, better everyday seating, Hardtop is quite when up.

But if I'm going into the canyons I think I would take the Boxster, but not sure as I don't know how well the sc handles yet.

The SC430 does not compare to a Boxster, they're two completely different cars.

The SC430 is heavy, slow, sucks gas and has no trunk

>>> weighs 3,840 lbs
>>> claimed 0-60 in high 5s or low 6s, but 15.6 quarter
>>> 16/22mpg
>>> automatic transmission, no manual available
>>> the hard top convertible takes up almost the entire trunk. Here's a photo with the convertible top down and taking up most the trunk space:

that little space in the back is the trunk.

It's very much a secretary's or real estate agent's car, the Lexus version of a Toyota Solara, but at least the Solara has a trunk:

[healthservices]

Originally Posted by 986_inquiry

The SC430 does not compare to a Boxster, they're two completely different cars.

The SC430 is heavy, slow, sucks gas and has no trunk

>>> weighs 3,840 lbs
>>> claimed 0-60 in high 5s or low 6s, but 15.6 quarter

Yes they are, they may be heavy but its got more torque than the boxsters and you feel torque in the city not HP

Originally Posted by 986_inquiry

>>> 16/22mpg

I have not hit 20 in either one of my Boxsters yet...

Originally Posted by 986_inquiry

>>> automatic transmission, no manual available

In the city and commuting, auto is ok for me, even though both my Boxsters are manual.

Originally Posted by 986_inquiry

>>> the hard top convertible takes up almost the entire trunk. Here's a photo with the convertible top down and taking up most the trunk space:

that little space in the back is the trunk.

But look at how much space you have if the top is up. It is there if you really need it.

There is a reason there are so many different cars, everybody has different needs and sometimes one car cannot fit all those needs.

besides the sound system on the Boxster


In other words "Why doesn't everyone drive a Boxster?

because I drive 2!



don't get me wrong I like the Boxsters, otherwise why would I have two?

[fivepointnine]

Originally Posted by healthservices

Yes they are, they may be heavy but its got more torque than the boxsters and you feel torque in the city not HP



I have not hit 20 in either one of my Boxsters yet...



In the city and commuting, auto is ok for me, even though both my Boxsters are manual.



But look at how much space you have if the top is up. It is there if you really need it.

There is a reason there are so many different cars, everybody has different needs and sometimes one car cannot fit all those needs.

besides the sound system on the Boxster


In other words "Why doesn't everyone drive a Boxster?

because I drive 2!



don't get me wrong I like the Boxsters, otherwise why would I have two?

my S has more torque than any of my vehicles in town, effortless acceleration!!!!

my other vehicles are a BMW X3 2.5i and a highly tuned Saab 9-3 putting down about 260hp to the wheels.....the Saab has more violent acceleration (pushing about 23psi boost) but with the turbo lag I think my S is just as fast if not faster accelerating, top speed is no contest going to the S and handling is also no contest also in favor of the S.....but the Saab gets over 30MPG on the highway and has 4 seats and is an auto, so its the daily driver for the wife.

[schnellman]

Back to the original question. And so you can all stop wondering, I have figured it out. Everyone isn't as cool as we are.

[986_inquiry]

Originally Posted by schnellman

Back to the original question. And so you can all stop wondering, I have figured it out. Everyone isn't as cool as we are.

:dance:

[nieuwhzn]

Originally Posted by fivepointnine

my S has more torque than any of my vehicles in town, effortless acceleration!!!!

my other vehicles are a BMW X3 2.5i and a highly tuned Saab 9-3 putting down about 260hp to the wheels.....the Saab has more violent acceleration (pushing about 23psi boost) but with the turbo lag I think my S is just as fast if not faster accelerating, top speed is no contest going to the S and handling is also no contest also in favor of the S.....but the Saab gets over 30MPG on the highway and has 4 seats and is an auto, so its the daily driver for the wife.

Ah, another Saab performance car driver. I've got a Viggen. Power and acceleration of the Viggen and the Boxster are about the same, but the delivery is completely different. The Boxster is rear wheel drive and naturally aspirated, the Viggen is front wheel drive and high pressure turbo. The Boxster power delivery is effortless and linear all the way to redline. The Viggen is working much harder (noticeable because it has sport motor and transmission mounts), but has virtually no turbo lag because of very clever tweaking of the throttle controls. Of course the biggest difference is rear wheel versus front wheel drive. The steering of the Boxster is much more crisp especially under acceleration. As long as you can get the power on the road (real men don't have traction control) the steering is extremely effortless. The Viggen has serious difficulties putting all its power down through the front wheels, because of the high torque the wheels not only spin but also suffer a lot from torque steering. The Viggen is a real handful when driving it to the max. Still, I love driving both cars, the Box for its sportiness, the Viggen for its sheer brutality. The Box is more fun because the top goes down, the Viggen is more because its a stealth fighter (my greatest joy is smoking clueless BMW's).

So, coming back to the original question. Part of the reason that not everyone is driving a Boxster is because other cars can be a lot of fun also.
Of course the main reason that not everyone is driving a fun car is because they don't care, they just want to go from A to B, yawn.

[fivepointnine]

Originally Posted by nieuwhzn

Ah, another Saab performance car driver. I've got a Viggen. Power and acceleration of the Viggen and the Boxster are about the same, but the delivery is completely different. The Boxster is rear wheel drive and naturally aspirated, the Viggen is front wheel drive and high pressure turbo. The Boxster power delivery is effortless and linear all the way to redline. The Viggen is working much harder (noticeable because it has sport motor and transmission mounts), but has virtually no turbo lag because of very clever tweaking of the throttle controls. Of course the biggest difference is rear wheel versus front wheel drive. The steering of the Boxster is much more crisp especially under acceleration. As long as you can get the power on the road (real men don't have traction control) the steering is extremely effortless. The Viggen has serious difficulties putting all its power down through the front wheels, because of the high torque the wheels not only spin but also suffer a lot from torque steering. The Viggen is a real handful when driving it to the max. Still, I love driving both cars, the Box for its sportiness, the Viggen for its sheer brutality. The Box is more fun because the top goes down, the Viggen is more because its a stealth fighter (my greatest joy is smoking clueless BMW's).

So, coming back to the original question. Part of the reason that not everyone is driving a Boxster is because other cars can be a lot of fun also.
Of course the main reason that not everyone is driving a fun car is because they don't care, they just want to go from A to B, yawn.

that is my wifes favorite thing to do is smoke cars that have no idea what the Saab is capable of. I also have the sport mounts in the Saab..she shakes and rattles at idle lol. I totally agree about acceleration......Boxster S is fast and linear to 7200 RPM, the Saab is brutal and you better be holding on and ready!

[Mark_T]

Quote "Actually a better question is why anyone would drive a mini-van?"

- I needed it for work!

[986_inquiry]

Originally Posted by healthservices

But look at how much space you have if the top is up.

Not much, it's shallow above that area, and that's why I bought a convertible, to leave the top up

Originally Posted by healthservices

besides the sound system on the Boxster

You mean the engine? Sounds great to me!

ghetto cruisers need "sound systems", we have Porsches If I wanted a sound system I'd drive an escalade and fill it full of subwoofers