11-20-2011, 07:30 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 111
|
Most cost effective HP+ modifications?
Does someone have a list of the most cost effective modifications to boost HP? That is, which mods have the higher HP to $ ratio?
De-amberibg and airbag sticker removals do not count.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 07:50 PM
|
#2
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 08:51 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 332
|
Most cost affective? Take **************** out... Enough said.
See that spare tire? Get rid of it... Have your bowling ball/ golf clubs from last weekend still in there? Take them out.
50lbs doesn't sound like much, but if you pull out that much, or more, I promise you'll feel the difference. When you go to the gas station from an empty tank to a full tank, i know i can feel the difference. 10 gal of gas is only 80lbs. Now take that to perspective when you take out another 100lbs
And for how much? FREE! Unitl you get serious and start putting on light weight wheels/seat/steering wheel/ battery/ etc.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 11:38 PM
|
#4
|
Ex Esso kid
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
|
An Underpully is a mod you truly feel, I don't know how it would be in a place like Az where you need max AC but other than that you truly feel the difference.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 11:46 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
+1 on the underdrive pulley.
The one I bought from Flat6 fitted perfectly and you can feel the difference in the low to medium rev range where 90% of your driving is....
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 05:09 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Here are some thoughts from a previous thread:
1. A comprehensive and methodical approach to revamping the vehicle's exhaust system; i.e. headers, cats, cat back ect...
2. Light weight under drive pulley
3. Larger throttle body and plenum
4. ECU re-programming
5. Lighter wheels (a potentially faster and better performing vehicle by means of
reducing unsprung weight and rotational mass)
6. Reducing weight in general; i.e. spare tires, oem seats, lighter battery ect.. (this is
more aimed toward tracking your boxster .
7. Suspension upgrades (though not a direct increase in power, a faster vehicle can be
had by means of better handling and performance .
8. Increasing airflow to the engine, i.e. cold air intake or filter replacement
9. A divorce (a major reduction in weight by means of one less passenger, as well as financial freedom to do more mods)
and the list goes on ...........
__________________
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 05:29 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
|
My current thoughts on the matter in terms of cost effective performance improvement:
1. Under drive crank pulley.
2. Weight loss (fly-weight buckets, remove AC equipment, remove spare, light weight back box). Will probably also remove and store the remove roof motors and transmissions - roof works really well manually when disconnected from the transmissions, oddly enough!
Even that won't be cheap if you buy everything new. But a used back box might not be too pricey, ditto buckets.
Question I have - is there any reason to be wary about fitting the underdrive pully? Don't think the factory one is damped, but even so...?
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 05:40 AM
|
#8
|
Opposed to Subie Burble
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central CT
Posts: 1,197
|
To add a bit more to Johnny's #8 (edited, previous reference to #9 was incorrect), I'd say smoothing out this airflow will also be a benefit. The stock plumbing could be better, as well all know, so one could consider replacing the hoses with smooth, straight tube and a couple of smooth elbow pieces, and that'd be a cheap and effective DIY. I'm sure, depending on your level of perfectionism, you could make it look very clean and like it belongs there.
__________________
-O/D
1997 Arctic Silver Boxster, 5-spd
IMSR + RMS
Robbins glass window top
Last edited by Overdrive; 11-23-2011 at 10:03 AM.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 01:36 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,935
|
Buy a used 911TT
__________________
GPRPCA Chief Driving Instructor
2008 Boxster S Limited Edition #005
2008 Cayman S Sport - Signal Green
1989 928 S4 5 spd - black
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 05:41 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by husker boxster
Buy a used 911TT 
|
Ya know he says it jokingly, but in reality, if you want a fast car, you're probably better off selling your boxster and buying like an older C5 corvette or something, because unless you do an engine swap it's never going to be fast. And even if you do that, you would have been better off spending your money on a stock, faster car...:ah:
|
|
|
11-22-2011, 01:33 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrmaddbrad
Ya know he says it jokingly, but in reality, if you want a fast car, you're probably better off selling your boxster and buying like an older C5 corvette or something, because unless you do an engine swap it's never going to be fast. And even if you do that, you would have been better off spending your money on a stock, faster car...:ah:
|
I said it half jokingly. For the exact reasons you list, you'll be spending thousands of dollars to chase 30 to maybe 50 extra HP.
__________________
GPRPCA Chief Driving Instructor
2008 Boxster S Limited Edition #005
2008 Cayman S Sport - Signal Green
1989 928 S4 5 spd - black
|
|
|
11-22-2011, 08:06 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA 94070
Posts: 1,450
|
I think the rule of thumb is $50 ~ $75 / hp
I think the max you can reach with "all tricks" is maybe an additional 50 hp = $3 ~ $4k
After that it gets real expensive with either an engine transplant > $15k or a turbo, also > $15k, so at this point it really might be cheaper to get a different car....
__________________
I still wave at Boxsters, but they no longer wave back :-(
2002 Boxster S "Violet" (sold but not forgotten)
2009 Carrera 4S "Kelsey" (current ride)
2015 FIAT 500e "Nikki" my commuter car
|
|
|
11-22-2011, 08:16 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisZang
I think the rule of thumb is $50 ~ $75 / hp
I think the max you can reach with "all tricks" is maybe an additional 50 hp = $3 ~ $4k
After that it gets real expensive with either an engine transplant > $15k or a turbo, also > $15k, so at this point it really might be cheaper to get a different car....
|
You turbo or supercharge your boxster and it will blow up.... I promise you... You may get even a full year out of it, but this engines will go out on you unless you fully build them... And again, Naturally Asperated is the way to go if you want fast, useable power..
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 03:26 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
|
For my money, a turbo Boxster would be ghastly anyway. For me one of the core appeals of these cars is the finely honed driving dynamics - and that includes sharp throttle response and linear, progressive power delivery Then there's the clarity of induction and exhaust notes.
An S-charger might be just about tolerable. But a turbo? Faggadaboutdit!
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 05:51 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Something to consider .
$1,000's and $1,000's later = 25 or so hp at the wheel .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 06:14 AM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pothole
For my money, a turbo Boxster would be ghastly anyway. For me one of the core appeals of these cars is the finely honed driving dynamics - and that includes sharp throttle response and linear, progressive power delivery Then there's the clarity of induction and exhaust notes.
An S-charger might be just about tolerable. But a turbo? Faggadaboutdit!
|
Totally agree - I had an Audi TT a while back, and while a total hoot, the dynamics are completely different. I briefly considered another TT, then test drove the Boxster, and never looked back.
__________________
Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles
2003 Midnight Blue S
LN IMS Retrofit
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 06:44 AM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 594
|
I looked at all the power adding mods available for the Boxster and added the HP claims all together. I excluded superchargers and turbochargers.
I got $90 per HP. Parts include performance intake, low temp thermostat, underdrive pulley, headers with sport cats, secondary bypass pipes, performance muffler, ECU upgrade, Pedro's Plenum upgrade, added 2HP for desnorkel and iridium sparkplugs.
I say most cost effective mods are ECU upgrade combined with performance intake and bypass pipes. $1700 for 20-25HP according to claims. That is about $78 per HP.
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 06:48 AM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 332
|
I'll say it again... A car with 200hp that weighs 3000lbs is a lot slower than a car with 200hp that weighs 2500lbs.... Like WAY slower...
Granted, unless you totally strip your car you're not going to get 500lbs out. But even 100lbs is feelable... Just take stuff out of your car! It will be faster..
And thats like $0 per hp lol. Cuz you're not gaining any horspepower or spending any money!! lol
If you want a car in a fast line, boxsters are not the car for you. If you want a great handling, fun, gorgeous car, then you should buy a boxster... Enough said.
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 07:01 AM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 594
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrmaddbrad
I'll say it again... A car with 200hp that weighs 3000lbs is a lot slower than a car with 200hp that weighs 2500lbs.... Like WAY slower...
Granted, unless you totally strip your car you're not going to get 500lbs out. But even 100lbs is feelable... Just take stuff out of your car! It will be faster..
And thats like $0 per hp lol. Cuz you're not gaining any horspepower or spending any money!! lol
If you want a car in a fast line, boxsters are not the car for you. If you want a great handling, fun, gorgeous car, then you should buy a boxster... Enough said.
|
True weight make a big difference. I think I read somehwere 0.2-0.3 second 0-60 improvement for every 100lbs lost. Problem with lowering weight-I drove without the engine cover carpet. I removed the carpet on top and the carpet behind the lower driver/passenger seat.
The car sounded horrible. It did not sound sporty at all. Those 5-10lb carpets make a huge difference in how good the engine sounds.
I thought of replacing front spare tire with Fix-a-flat spray, but idk how it effects my rim when trying to get a new tire? Has anyone used fix-a-flat? And I believe there are only 2 or 3 aftermarket rims for this car that are actually lighter than stock rims unfortunately.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 AM.
| |