12-23-2010, 05:20 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 133
|
Good responses. I figured I would get flamed in the first go-around for being somewhat disloyal to Mr. Porsche. But, we all seem to agree that the Boxster is a fine car with issues that will require a second mortgage to keep going.
FYI. I do love my Porsche. All maintenances are performed ahead of schedule. It is spotlessly clean at ALL times. Very, very gently treated - to obsession.
To 'PlayersExpress'. Yes, the car has grown on me, that, although disappointed, I do not want to use it as trade in for my next car. It is a 'keeper', although sometimes that mystifies me.
To 'Jake'. I agree with you. Exclusive of the engine, the remainder of the car is so damn good. You mentioned that the 911 uses the same engine as a Boxster. Well, I guess upgrading to the next level would not work (unless Porsche puts in a Chevy, Toyota, or Honda engine in their chassis).
To 'Steve Tinker'. Good observations.
To 'Dale_K'. I am seriously thinking about a Corvette and currently have requests for quotes through several dealerships. I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't join my other cars within the next 6 months.
|
|
|
12-23-2010, 05:27 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chadds Ford, PA
Posts: 177
|
Another thing while we are on the usual IMS discussion as it relates to the car and ownership. Although it is near impossible to figure out the actual failure rate, I am surprised how few Boxsters advertised for sale have new or replaced engines. Maybe I am not reading the ads close enough, but I am pretty sure in the past month or so of looking at cars online, looking country wide, I can only recall one Boxster for sale with a swapped engine due to failure. I think the car had/has 130K miles but new engine 30K miles ago. I would expect to find a lot more cars for sale with different engines.
FWIT, these same discussions go on and on over on the Fchat site. For those that have the courage to step up and say a Ferrari actually has a flaw, they do bring up good points. It applies to the Pcars as well. On one hand you spend all this money on a car and expect it to be flawless, yet it is a performance car that demands a little more care and service, etc. The discussion goes round and round....
|
|
|
12-23-2010, 07:13 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: nj
Posts: 12
|
I know on these boards we hear more dreaded stories than what the actual percentage of failures are, but it was a big factor for me getting an 09 or later boxster. Now lets see what failures we will get with these engines.....
At least porsche finally put some money in and redesigned the engine instead of trying to patch the problem with larger and multiple row IMS bearings. I think they just took way too long.
|
|
|
12-23-2010, 07:19 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: trenton nj
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stab1991
I know on these boards we hear more dreaded stories than what the actual percentage of failures are, but it was a big factor for me getting an 09 or later boxster. Now lets see what failures we will get with these engines.....
At least porsche finally put some money in and redesigned the engine instead of trying to patch the problem with larger and multiple row IMS bearings. I think they just took way too long.
|
in another 5 years VW will have fixed the smoke on startup
|
|
|
12-23-2010, 07:33 AM
|
#5
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Quote:
At least porsche finally put some money in and redesigned the engine instead of trying to patch the problem with larger and multiple row IMS bearings. I think they just took way too long.
|
They did that on 2005, called it the M97.
The only failure call we've received this week (odd!) just came in.. 2005 Carrera with a failed M97 bearing... Pictures from this one are on the way!
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
12-23-2010, 07:54 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: nj
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
They did that on 2005, called it the M97.
The only failure call we've received this week (odd!) just came in.. 2005 Carrera with a failed M97 bearing... Pictures from this one are on the way!
|
I wasnt talking about the m97, I was talking about finally making the N9A, I think thats the code for it.
Im sure you will be seeing more m97 failures as time goes. This was the patch upgrade I think.
|
|
|
12-23-2010, 09:56 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,590
|
Why do we keep patronizing the marque
Because it is so much fun to drive. I still look for an excuse to drive it after 5+ years of ownership.
Because if you aren't one of the unlucky ones, the maintenance is relatively easy and cheap with many online resources better than other makes. My Boxster has cost me less than my Honda or Acura over the same period in spite of me using generic parts in the Honda/Acura and upgraded parts in the Porsche.
Because we don't know of a better car with better reliability.
Because we don't obsess over what could happen.
Because they are relatively cheap, practical, etc
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 AM.
| |