03-21-2010, 06:09 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,396
|
new fuel filter, lower mpg
so i just replaced the fuel filter which had never been replaced, to my knowledge at 72k miles.
now the car is getting way worse mpg than before - from 24mpg before the change to 17mpg after the change. ( have filled up once since the change )
has anyone else noticed this? any recommendations? the car doesn't run bad and still seems to have the same acceleration as before. no bad idle and no abnormal "gasoline" smell.
__________________
"Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you."
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 08:28 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
do you still have the old one? maybe put it in and see if your mileage goes up.
I just replaced mine and didn't notice any difference. I also replaced all of the 02 sensors.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 08:39 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Have your driving habits or conditions changed at all since you swapped out the filter? If not, then I would run through another tank full or two and see if the mpg restores itself. There is no reason a new fuel filter would reduce gas mileage like that so I'm suspecting something else is at play here.
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 10:36 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 247
|
I'm just guessing, but if the old one was clogged up, you could have higher fuel pressure with a clean filter. You would be using more fuel/running a little richer until the DME trims itself back eventually. Just a thought.
__________________
2003 Cayenne Turbo
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 10:54 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by manolo
I'm just guessing, but if the old one was clogged up, you could have higher fuel pressure with a clean filter. You would be using more fuel/running a little richer until the DME trims itself back eventually. Just a thought.
|
That's a good thought, but I don't think that's the case. The ECU makes hundreds of calculations per second and it wouldn't take very long to figure out the correct mixture. Also, depending on the year there would a return line so any unused fuel would go back to the tank anyway.
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 02:00 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
Have you checked if there is a fuel leak around the filters snap on connectors. It doesn't need much of a weep while driving to blow out your fuel usage - remember it will only leak when the engine (or ignition) is on or running.
So to confirm a leak, you will have to get under the car with the ignition in the "on" position to pressure up the system.
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 08:04 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
Look for leaks as mentioned.
Disconnect battery for 10 min. to reboot the DME.
Most likely anecdotal, you cannot judge MPG based on one tank, run 5 or 6 and then avg. it out. Also, your baseline is likely skewed, esp. if based only on one tank, or even a few.
Cheers!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:15 AM.
| |