10-06-2009, 08:48 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 173
|
It's king of hard to compare both systems in any of the drawings I have seen. maybe someone who has worked on both can add to the discussion.
__________________
2002 Boxster S Seal Grey
2010 Ford F150 FX4 Luxury
Retired after 38 years with the same company.
|
|
|
10-08-2009, 06:11 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaak
It's king of hard to compare both systems in any of the drawings I have seen. maybe someone who has worked on both can add to the discussion.
|
picture below shows side by side of the intake plenum. the part that I was focusing in is the additional butterfly in the plenum in the "T".
it's opeation is controlled by electronics and vacuum. I don't think 986 ECU has this feature and therefore compatibility problem
|
|
|
10-08-2009, 06:49 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6
|
I got the unit installed in my MY03 base a few weeks ago. Did a bunch of timed runs in 4th gear from 2000 to 4000 RPM both before and after over the same road within about an hour of each other in the middle of a sunny day. The times averaged 3/4 of a second faster after the install. Haven't seen a downside to it yet - did a DE event on the 26th and really noticed the extra acceleration.
Now for the "seat of the pants" stuff: seems like the engine idles more smoothly, very low end torque seems better - less likely to stall from a standstill, maybe has a little bit more "growl" during acceleration (or maybe it's just the mind playing tricks).
|
|
|
10-08-2009, 04:39 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Unionville, CT
Posts: 442
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinMD
I got the unit installed in my MY03 base a few weeks ago. Did a bunch of timed runs in 4th gear from 2000 to 4000 RPM both before and after over the same road within about an hour of each other in the middle of a sunny day. The times averaged 3/4 of a second faster after the install. Haven't seen a downside to it yet - did a DE event on the 26th and really noticed the extra acceleration.
Now for the "seat of the pants" stuff: seems like the engine idles more smoothly, very low end torque seems better - less likely to stall from a standstill, maybe has a little bit more "growl" during acceleration (or maybe it's just the mind playing tricks).
|
Good information, Dave! Do you know the length of the "run" or the speeds at start / finish for the distance?
How do you feel about price vs results?
Bob
__________________
2001 Boxster, GT3 console delete, lower stress bar, RoW M030 suspension package, painted bumperettes.
|
|
|
10-10-2009, 07:01 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobiam
Good information, Dave! Do you know the length of the "run" or the speeds at start / finish for the distance?
How do you feel about price vs results?
Bob
|
It's a simple install. Didn't take long and for the money it's low on the cost for benefit in my book (at least for a Porsche  ). Not sure on the speeds or distance, I was so intent on watching the tach with my passenger to make sure the timings were as accurate as possible. Ran the same road in the same direction for all of the runs trying to keep the variables down. Did 7 runs both before and after to make sure I was getting good timings.
A dyno would have been nice... but I don't have access to one. This is the best I could think of to try to take a reading on if there was an improvement.
|
|
|
10-10-2009, 01:05 PM
|
#6
|
www.klisstle.com
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 926
|
|
|
|
10-10-2009, 03:31 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 319
|
Got mine from Pedro yesterday and installed it last night so I haven't had the time yet to put much mileage on...only 50 miles or so as of now. And now it's up on jack stands while I flush brake fluid and wait on new pads to get here Monday. But next weekend is the last DE of the year and I'll report after that. Assuming the weather doesn't freeze us out!
Nice pics ddb...looks exactly like mine! Oil, dust and all. lol Mine was a little dirtier than yours, but it cleaned up well. I was also wondering what the odd shaped piece is for. Is it a muffler/silencer sort of thing? I don't know.
OH....be SURE...positive.. that there are no air leaks. Double check the rubber fittings on each end of the tube. I had a small leak that I couldn't see, on the bottom side of the tube. The fitting hadn't seated well. WOW.. the computer went nuts! Car started, but wouldn't idle. No power, no throttle response, backfires. Wouldn't hold a speed. And it threw several cel's. I only went a few blocks but that was enough. Came home, undid the hoses, reattached them making certain they were dead center on the tube. Magic...it runs like a top.
Just a word of warning if you happen to get an air leak. The computer gods are NOT happy.
Bob
__________________
79 911SC Targa.. gone but not forgotten
2001 Boxster Black/Savanah Beige
RoW M030 suspension
7/15 mm spacers
Deambered
Desnorked
SS door sills
Debadged
Clear tails
Technobrace
Technobra
I'll never own another black car!
|
|
|
10-11-2009, 04:09 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In the garage...
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddb
Does anyone know the purpose of the oddly shaped piece on the tube from the air box to the throttle body? It is close to the throttle body end.

|
If you're talking about the wart in this picture, it's a muffler to help meet European sound abatement ordinances or the like.
|
|
|
10-14-2009, 04:36 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddb
Does anyone know the purpose of the oddly shaped piece on the tube from the air box to the throttle body? It is close to the throttle body end.
|
It's just a sound baffle to meet TUV standards and make it quieter.
Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is: Racecar!
|
|
|
10-09-2009, 06:28 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
I would hypothesize that this could be made to work for owners of 03-04 cars by installing the necessary plumbing and electrical connections and flashing the DME to a 9X7 map. Highly doubt it's worth all the headache, however.
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
10-08-2009, 09:16 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb01box
picture below shows side by side of the intake plenum. the part that I was focusing in is the additional butterfly in the plenum in the "T".
it's opeation is controlled by electronics and vacuum. I don't think 986 ECU has this feature and therefore compatibility problem
|
Thanks ... one can see that they are not compatible. Was hoping though ....
__________________
2002 Boxster S Seal Grey
2010 Ford F150 FX4 Luxury
Retired after 38 years with the same company.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.
| |