11-03-2008, 09:22 PM
|
#1
|
|
There Is No Substitute.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,253
|
I think a 4 cylinder Boxster will be fine as long as it remains quick. If it can do a decent 0-60 time and get 25+ mpg I think it will appeal to even more people. This move might also have something to do with new restrictions on fuel consumption, that's hitting sports car manufactures hard.
__________________
1999 Ocean Blue Metallic Boxster - blueboxster.com
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 08:01 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 178
|
Hey, some of us already have a 4-cyl mid-engined Porsche!
Don't forget, the E30 M3, with it's highly-strung 4-cyl, is viewed by most as the most visceral version of the M3, and it's an excellent track car. A 4-cyl is a different experience than a more powerful 6- or 8-cyl, and it can be a lot of fun on the street. Nothing like having a car that weighs closer to 2,000 lbs as compared 3,000+ lbs when it comes to transitions and general maneuverability.
BTW, another 4-cyl advantage: I drove from Phoenix today to our house in Flagstaff and back. It's about 175 miles each way, with a 6,000 ft elevation gain going to Flagstaff. I drove my new Honda Fit Sport, cruise set between 75 and 80 mph on I-17. On the steepest grades it dropped all the way to 3rd (at 70 mph), just under 6,000 rpm, but Honda builds a pretty smooth motor, so it wasn't unpleasant. Round trip mileage (as measured by actual fuel consumption and mileage, not by the wacky "avg. mpg" guage) was 35.3 mpg. Not bad!
__________________
Paul B. Anders / Phoenix, AZ
1970 Porsche 914 / 2003 Porsche Boxster / 2009 Honda Fit Sport Auto
|
|
|
11-04-2008, 08:48 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 524
|
I have a 4 cyl turbo Porsche now. Stock it was rated @ 247hp. I have a chip, boost controller and dual port wastegate and already pushing 275 whp. This is just from a simple $600 expense. I have friends who are pushing 350 to over 400 whp in their modified 951's. A 4cyl turbo Boxster that will be lighter than current base boxster will be enticing. It won't be long before this turbo will have more power than the new Boxster S with just simple mods. As others mentioned the engine note will definitely change.
__________________
2008 Boxster S PDE2
02 Boxster S Blk on Blk(Stock for the Wife)
88 turbo S (My Toy) slightly modified
|
|
|
11-05-2008, 12:12 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MTL
Posts: 9
|
I will believe that when Porsche official announces it.
|
|
|
11-05-2008, 02:27 PM
|
#5
|
|
Schatten-Baum-Mechaniker
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 242
|
The 914 is reborn!
__________________
Tommy
2000 Boxster S
1973 914
|
|
|
11-05-2008, 04:44 PM
|
#6
|
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MikeBat
I will believe that when Porsche official announces it.
|
Agreed, I won't be holding my breath. It would be nice to see a much lighter, 4-cylinder car, but now that the Elise, Miata and Solstice/Sky are crowding both ends of that market, I don't see how it would compete. And you know Porsche wouldn't tolerate a British car costing more than theirs so it would have to be pricey too, like over US$45k.
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 08:18 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 939
|
Guys, you gotta realize, this kind of move is being FORCED on Porsche. Fuel economy standards are being pushed on auto manufacturers, and face it, Porsche does NOT do economy cars. It would be very hard for Porsche to comply using just their flat six engines. Sure, they have made great advances... direct injection and other schemes DO help fuel economy.
Given I can get 31mpg highway, and average about 26mpg for my commuting in my 2.7l Boxster, I'd venture with a ~2.0l turbocharged engine, that would probably be closer to 35-38mpg highway, and 30mpg average. Not too shabby. And a turbocharged 4 would leave room for tuning. Yes, I know Porsche would already have a very well tuned engine, but if economy and meeting such standards was a priority, they may have to leave the engines detuned a little to meet those standards. Then we can tune them for more, standards be damned!
I also wonder if Porsche will look at diesel engines... a diesel 4 banger making ~150 horses and 300+lb torque would be pretty interesting!
__________________
2001 Boxster - Grey on Grey
1969 911T Targa - 'Stinky'
http://www.zoto.com/frayadjacent/img...f27a-4a399.jpg <---- my car. ^ crap I post.
"The existence of the flamethrower is evidence that someone, somewhere once said 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't want to have to walk over there to do it.'"
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 08:44 AM
|
#8
|
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FrayAdjacent
Guys, you gotta realize, this kind of move is being FORCED on Porsche. Fuel economy standards are being pushed on auto manufacturers, and face it, Porsche does NOT do economy cars. It would be very hard for Porsche to comply using just their flat six engines. Sure, they have made great advances... direct injection and other schemes DO help fuel economy.
Given I can get 31mpg highway, and average about 26mpg for my commuting in my 2.7l Boxster, I'd venture with a ~2.0l turbocharged engine, that would probably be closer to 35-38mpg highway, and 30mpg average. Not too shabby. And a turbocharged 4 would leave room for tuning. Yes, I know Porsche would already have a very well tuned engine, but if economy and meeting such standards was a priority, they may have to leave the engines detuned a little to meet those standards. Then we can tune them for more, standards be damned!
I also wonder if Porsche will look at diesel engines... a diesel 4 banger making ~150 horses and 300+lb torque would be pretty interesting!
|
The regulations may not apply to Porsche. There is a minimum in volume sales that have to be met to fall under this law. This is how Ferrari, Lamborghini and others that get 16 on the highway can still sell cars. I'm not sure but I bet these rules also apply to subsidiaries like Jaguar and Aston Martin.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-cafe-standards-could-exempt-porsche.html
Last edited by blue2000s; 11-06-2008 at 08:55 AM.
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 09:22 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FrayAdjacent
Guys, you gotta realize, this kind of move is being FORCED on Porsche. Fuel economy standards are being pushed on auto manufacturers, and face it, Porsche does NOT do economy cars. It would be very hard for Porsche to comply using just their flat six engines. Sure, they have made great advances... direct injection and other schemes DO help fuel economy.
Given I can get 31mpg highway, and average about 26mpg for my commuting in my 2.7l Boxster, I'd venture with a ~2.0l turbocharged engine, that would probably be closer to 35-38mpg highway, and 30mpg average. Not too shabby. And a turbocharged 4 would leave room for tuning. Yes, I know Porsche would already have a very well tuned engine, but if economy and meeting such standards was a priority, they may have to leave the engines detuned a little to meet those standards. Then we can tune them for more, standards be damned!
I also wonder if Porsche will look at diesel engines... a diesel 4 banger making ~150 horses and 300+lb torque would be pretty interesting!
|
Yet another reason why Porsche is getting back in bed with VW. When the government looks at the fuel economy across the whole family of vehicles it is easier to get away with a gas guzzling 911 when a Golf TDI is balancing things out.
With the way Porsche has been releasing a new version of the 911 every other month, I think we are going to see a 320 HP direct injection Boxster with PDK before we see four banger.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:29 AM.
| |