02-06-2008, 06:37 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 128
|
Same helmet for track and motorcycle?
I'm considering buying a motorcycle and also starting to do some DE and auto-x.
Anyone know if an autoracing helmet such as the Bell M4 would be appropriate as a regular use motorcycle helmet? I'm looking auto helmet for the SA rating.
http://www.soloracer.com/bellm4.html
Thanks for the feedback.
__________________
2003 Audi A4 Avant 3.0/6MT - Orient Blue/Beige
2002 Porsche Boxster 5spd - Seal Gray/Black
1990 BMW 325i (convertible) 5spd - Red/Beige/Black Top
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 06:55 AM
|
#2
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
Maybe,
Check with your local DE organization (PCA, POC, SCCA) to see what they require. Most track events now require Snell SA rating.
The differences:
Snell SA rated helmets are fire resistant and designed to protect you in a multi- impact collision. They are usually a little heavier and have less visibility than M rated motorcycle helmets. (recent Snell SA2005 rated helmets from Zaamp and Pyrotect are good quality for a lot less $$)
Snell M rated helmets are designed to protect you in a single impact collision, are not fire resistant, are lighter weight and have the best visibility.
Good hunting.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 07:00 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 128
|
SA it is here (Barber Motorsports Park).
__________________
2003 Audi A4 Avant 3.0/6MT - Orient Blue/Beige
2002 Porsche Boxster 5spd - Seal Gray/Black
1990 BMW 325i (convertible) 5spd - Red/Beige/Black Top
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 07:23 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
You might want to consider how much of each planned use you'll be doing. I have the Bell M4 for several years, and it's a really great helmet for Auto-X, Track, and DEs.
But, imo, it's way too heavy for regular use on a bike. I have a Shoei helmet for riding my bike, but have tried using the M4. The M4 is not only too heavy (for all but the shortest rides), but not as well ventilated, and has a tunnel-vision effect compared to the Shoei. It severely cuts down your traffic awareness causing you to turn your head much more, increasing neck fatigue.
If you plan to DE, Track or Auto-X more than ride the bike, you may be OK. If the opposite is true, you may want to revisit your decision, or plan on buying a dedicated helmet for each.
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 08:55 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 128
|
Thanks - that's exactly what I wanted to know. Looks like I'll start with an auto helmet then get a dedicated bike helmet if I go the motorcycle route.
I was looking at the m4 since the Mag series (open face) doesn't seem compatible with a shield (for motorcycle riding). Given that is no longer an issue what are your thoughts on open vs close faced for auto-x/DE?
__________________
2003 Audi A4 Avant 3.0/6MT - Orient Blue/Beige
2002 Porsche Boxster 5spd - Seal Gray/Black
1990 BMW 325i (convertible) 5spd - Red/Beige/Black Top
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 09:39 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
Personally, I prefer an open face helmet for Auto-X and DE. The windshield will keep most everything away from your face and I recommend a good pair of polycarb sunglasses, much cooler and generally better visibility. A closed face can get a little warm waiting for your runs - great when there is some airflow, but nasty when it's still.
I have the closed face because of other racing that I do. I had a Bell Mag 5 which I used for Auto-X and DEs, but I stupidly set it down in the paddock area and some unscrupulous jerk decided to give it a good home, forcing me to finish the season with the M4. I'll most likely get another open face this spring.
Last edited by Lil bastard; 02-06-2008 at 09:41 AM.
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 11:21 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 846
|
While I like the visability of an open face helmet, the idea of busting my teeth/jaw on a steering wheel in an accident makes me wear a full face.
As mentioned, SA vs M ratings. Most car sactioning bodies require an SA rated helmet.
__________________
1976 914 2.0
2000 Boxster 2.7 (sold)
1978 911 SC (sold)
1970 914 w/2056 (sold)
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 11:50 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
racer_d
that's a good point. But I still have the OEM airbag steering wheel so it doesn't concern me as much. In my cars w/o the airbag, it's always full face.
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 11:50 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 244
|
In a car with airbags, an open face helmet should be fine. Certainly more comfortable and with much better visibility.
If you will be tracking a car without airbags, then I agree completely with Racer Dave... go full face.
__________________
-- John
'00 Boxster S
'86 911 Carrera Coupe (Sold)
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 12:06 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
My pal has a Ducati Monster and I was using his passenger helmet, I think it was SHOEI and no one ever inspected my helmet. I have a Bieffe F1 now, great helmet I was just karting with it the other day.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 01:13 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
Not really hijacking the thread, because it's relevant to the author's question, sort of
But, there has been a great debate in the Moto community re. the validity of the Snell M standards as compared to ECE or DOT ones.
While I don't think there is a better existing standard for Automotive or Track helmets than Snell, their Moto standard seems a bit wanting. I have worn an ECE 22.05 rated lid for a few years and will continue to do so.
It'll be interesting to see if any of the modified Moto criteria for the M2010 rating will spill over to the upcoming SA2010 (Automotive) rating. If interested, you can read more here: http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/gearbox/motorcycle_helmet_review/.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 06:05 AM
|
#12
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil bastard
Not really hijacking the thread, because it's relevant to the author's question, sort of
But, there has been a great debate in the Moto community re. the validity of the Snell M standards as compared to ECE or DOT ones.
While I don't think there is a better existing standard for Automotive or Track helmets than Snell, their Moto standard seems a bit wanting. I have worn an ECE 22.05 rated lid for a few years and will continue to do so.
It'll be interesting to see if any of the modified Moto criteria for the M2010 rating will spill over to the upcoming SA2010 (Automotive) rating. If interested, you can read more here: http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/gearbox/motorcycle_helmet_review/.
|
Very interesting study on Motorcycle helmets. I agree with their conclusions. It sounds like Snell has some homework to do.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47 PM.
| |