Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2005, 01:06 PM   #1
Lux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 401
No_name,

Are you on crack? The S2K has better balance than the Boxster? The Boxster has a 44/56 ratio. How exactly is the S2K better balanced? Maybe while it's sitting still but that's about it. Please explain...and I'd love to hear this.

In the meantime, let's go thru some physics and let's have you refute these claims I'm making:

1. Boxster has a lower polar moment of inertia due to the motor's c/g being closer to the driver. Lower moi makes the car pivot easier (e.g. slalom). All this relative to the S2K. True or false. Explain.

2. Boxster's 44/56 ratio is superior to S2K.
2a. During acceleration, the weight is transferred more on the rear wheels.
2b. During braking, the heavier rear allows the rear brakes to be more efficient.
True or false. Explain.

So you think my comments make you go hmmm? I think you better check yourself.

BTW, short of working for Honda, what makes you so sure that there will be '06 and '07 model S2K's? As far as I'm concerned, your "rumor" of there being cars is just as valid as other rumors of the S2K going into extinction.

PS:
My comment of "the only midengine that matters has to be behind the driver" is "not convincing" to you? Just because you refuse to be educated. You come in here spouting off about how great the S2K is and now about how it's better balanced. If you wanted to learn, you should have just asked why m/r is better than f/r.

Meanwhile, you haven't provided any facts to back up your claim. Feel free to go into "geek talk" as you put it. I'm a mechanical engineer. Bring it.

Again, refute my points. Otherwise, cut the ****************.


-

Last edited by Lux; 04-05-2005 at 02:45 PM.
Lux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 01:39 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 26
Great points. Certainly lot more productive than hyperbole made earlier. I'd be sure to find time to resond tonight. Thanks
No_Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 08:31 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 26
OK. I see my posts are being butchered and put in to wrong context. If I may, I like to recap what I’ve posted in cliff notes. You can go back to verify if you like.

QporscheQ: “…Honda and Nissan sales will be in the millions. So does it really surprise you that there is a 10:1 S2K to Boxster ratio at SCCA? Your Boxster has a lot more Porsche overhead money in it then some guy's Honda or Nissan… One of the things that I really like about my Boxster is that in terms of the automotive world there really aren’t all that many of them (or us owners). I don’t want a car that everybody else has..."

What he said there is just wrong, so I made the below response: “Wait a minute. There are between 8 - 9,000 S2K's for US in each production year. Boxster, began production in '97, outnumbers the S2K on the road. If it is exclusivity that you seek, you bought the wrong car. Despite that, the number of S2K's in my local auto-x and SCDA track events far outnumbers the 911's and Boxsters combine, though not quite as drastic as the 10:1 ratio aforementioned for the SCCA. I'll leave it to you to figure out why that is.

I also said this: “As for overhead, S2K is the only other RWD car in the company and it shares zero parts w/ its siblings. Everything from its x-bone frame to its mid-engine layout to its interior is designed from scratch... with great success. They were also built - hand-assemble, I might add - in a Japanese plant dedicated to only the S2K and NSX. So they are not exactly saving much money from labor or shipping either.” This was in light of (overhead) cost, not proclaiming S2K’s mid-engine layout is equal to better than Boxster’s.


Lexuspilot: “When someone asks what kind of car I drive, I say "Porsche"....that's it.
Who wants to say "Honda, but it's a S2000, know what that is? It doesn't share components with other hondas, and it outnumbers the other cars at my SCCA"


My response: “That's OK b/c not everyone needs to be a "brand-whore." You see, some people enjoy a car for what it truly is, not how it reflects upon them. Those are the people that I'd like be associated with and be friends with. Sadly, your notion typifies many sports car owners nowadays.” I didn’t “get all high and mighty calling people brand whores.” It was a direct response to Lexuspilot alone, to say that not everyone cares about brand name as much as he does.


Lux: “And seeing more S2K's at the autocross? BFD. Maybe more Boxster owners prefer the track to driving around in parking lots. Here's the bottom line...the S2K is being discontinued even with a modest price of $30K.

I promptly clarified “SCDA events are road course track events. They run on NHIS, LimeRock, and Watkins Glen.” I still see more S2K’s there than 911 and Boxsters combine. Then you started the “discontinued” talk, based on rumors, to suggest that S2K “don’t sell well.” I said, “There probably won’t be a 2nd gen. S2000. Even if there was, no one would know about it b/c Honda keep info tightly sealed. I’ll bet you dinner though that there will an MY06, and then I’ll bet you dinner again there will be an MY07 S2000.”


Lux: “BTW, short of working for Honda, what makes you so sure that there will be '06 and '07 model S2K's? As far as I'm concerned, your "rumor" of there being cars is just as valid as other rumors of the S2K going into extinction.”

My response: Even most people who work for Honda are kept in the dark about future model plans. My assumption is based on this: Honda just moved MY05 S2000’s production to a different plant to make room for the new RL. From a financial standpoint, I don’t see them move a production infrastructure hundreds of miles just to extend its life for one more year, esp. one that builds less 15,000 units world-wide. I am still willing to bet dinner on it.


Lux: “Porsche is a boutique car maker. They deal with low volumes by having higher prices. An S2K that only sells in the 20K volume range at $30K is a failure for a manufacturer like Honda.”

False presumption, to which I replied, “the plan for S2000 was 5,000 units/year for US. It ballooned to what it is (8-9k/yr) due to stronger demand than expected. I can’t say Honda is disappointed with its success.” You can look that up.

All through out, I was correcting misconceptions about the S2K. I did not say one thing to discredit the Boxster itself. But I get the impression that everyone thinks I am bashing it. I have no incentive to do so, as I have only 2 more months in the S2000 before it will be retired in favor of the 987 BS.


Lux, I appreciate you found the time to list the advantages of rear-mid-engine car. I do owe you a constructive response for further discussion in return. Let me gather my research and respond to you tomorrow night as time has run out on me this evening.

Last edited by No_Name; 04-05-2005 at 08:34 PM.
No_Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 12:03 AM   #4
Lux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 401
No_name,

I like how you recapped everything and ignored the main issue here. Classic troll moves. You're bashing owners and Boxsters on a Boxster enthusiast site as per your quotes below (if I may do a little recapping myself):

1. That's OK b/c not everyone needs to be a "brand-whore." <--- That's insulting a member.

2. I can tell you one thing though: all S2K drivers can drive a stick; no bimbo-blonde, trophy-wife, blvd-cruisers there. <--- Again, how is this not bashing Boxsters and owners? Ever think there might be some tiptronic owners on this site?

I don't know why you're even buying a Boxster with all of your comments...unless you're just trolling. You should just go find that '06 S2K and save yourself from being the only Porsche at the track.


-
Lux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 05:43 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
It is probably time to call a time out on this issue of the S2000 vs the Boxster.

Certainly both are fine cars. Since this is a Porsche Boxster forum, we tend to view that car is certain favorable terms.

No one can win the argument as to which is the "better" car since that is by definition, a subjective assessement.

Buy what you like, drive what you like.

"Do not take a dump on your neighbors front yard!"

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 06:39 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lux
No_name,

I like how you recapped everything and ignored the main issue here. Classic troll moves. You're bashing owners and Boxsters on a Boxster enthusiast site as per your quotes below (if I may do a little recapping myself):

1. That's OK b/c not everyone needs to be a "brand-whore." <--- That's insulting a member.

2. I can tell you one thing though: all S2K drivers can drive a stick; no bimbo-blonde, trophy-wife, blvd-cruisers there. <--- Again, how is this not bashing Boxsters and owners? Ever think there might be some tiptronic owners on this site?

I don't know why you're even buying a Boxster with all of your comments...unless you're just trolling. You should just go find that '06 S2K and save yourself from being the only Porsche at the track.


-
Nope, I bashed (if you want to call it that) the poster, owner or not, that made this statement: “When someone asks what kind of car I drive, I say "Porsche"....that's it.
Who wants to say "Honda, but it's a S2000, know what that is? It doesn't share components with other hondas, and it outnumbers the other cars at my SCCA"

Not once did I bash the Boxster.
No_Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 10:42 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 335
In defense of the S2000, you do find a lot of brand snobbery amongst Porsche people (not thinking of anyone in particular just thinking out loud). An S2000 is a faster car at the track than a base Boxster. It does have a very loyal following among the go fast for less cash bunch.

I'll tell you this much, if I had decided to only shop new cars I would be driving an S2000 right now.
BuffaloBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2005, 01:24 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 201
Wow..I am a brand whore. Was I brand whore when I was driving my Focus a month ago?
I'd drive/buy a 350z, s2000, STI, or M3. I just didn't. Dude, I drove a focus and loved it. I was on Focaljet.com just like this site.

People judge so fast.

All I said, is I never have to qualify my Porsche purchase. Not that I would care what someone thought of my S2000 if I drove one.

And my screen name has nothing to do with car ownership.
__________________
2004 Boxster - Carmon Red/ Black-SOLD
18" Carrera Lt, Painted to match roll bars, PnP Rear Speakers, Sports Tailpipe
2004 Tonka Truck H2

05 S - looking...
lexuspilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page