View Poll Results: S owner's regrets
|
Would buy S again
|
  
|
52 |
83.87% |
Would buy base model if had to do over
|
  
|
5 |
8.06% |
It makes no difference (don't know)
|
  
|
5 |
8.06% |
06-12-2007, 07:59 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 35
|
I had a 2005 slk 350 which went away due to early engine failure and MB being total a-h's, but that's a whole 'nother story. After driving the base Boxster, the S , C4 and C4S , I felt that the 2007 BoxS had the best fun/$ ratio. It's easy to spend much more, yet end up without a lot more car or significantly better performance. I'd only consider the base if most driving is in the city or $$$ is a constraint.
Last edited by raddoc; 06-12-2007 at 08:07 AM.
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 08:21 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 251
|
Agree with those who have said that this is 100% about budget.
There is no denying that the S is better, and there is no denying that the S is more expensive, all else equal. And the fact that you're buying a Boxster as opposed to a Civic implies that there is part of you who cares about either performance or status (I hope it's the former in most cases!). In both cases, the S holds the edge. So the question is whether it's worth the extra money. And I imagine that's as much or more about personal budget than it is about anything else.
I bought my non-S in college when $25k was a lot of money to me. Had I instead bought today, I probably would buy an '03 S. Had I instead bought it today AND had I not gotten married last year, I'd probably buy a new S. So it's budget/priorities that kept me out of the S, not some bizarre preference for exactly 201hp.
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 09:04 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 874
|
Anyone know if the insurance of the "S" is more or the same as the base model?? Seem like it would be more.
When I switched from an 05 base to an 06 S, the difference was marginal. Less than $100/6 months.
In my experience, a new Box is a surprisingly cheap car to insure.
__________________
http://i7.tinypic.com/24ovngk.jpghttp://i7.tinypic.com/24ow0id.jpg
06 987S- Sold
Carrara White / Black / Black/Stone Grey Two-tone
05 987 5-speed - Sold
Midnight Blue Metallic / Metropol Blue / Sand Beige
06 MB SLK350- Lease escapee
Iridium Silver Metallic / Black
We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true. - Robert Wilensky
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 09:59 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 251
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD987
In my experience, a new Box is a surprisingly cheap car to insure.
|
I had the same experience when I insured mine. Coming from BMWs, my insurance went WAY down, even though the car was more expensive. I was told that since the rates are based on claims history, the demographic and disposition of the average driver plays a more significant role even than does simply power, cost to repair, etc., and that Porsche drivers are among the better drivers (definitely moreso than BMW drivers).
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 10:13 AM
|
#5
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YellowJacket
I had the same experience when I insured mine. Coming from BMWs, my insurance went WAY down, even though the car was more expensive. I was told that since the rates are based on claims history, the demographic and disposition of the average driver plays a more significant role even than does simply power, cost to repair, etc., and that Porsche drivers are among the better drivers (definitely moreso than BMW drivers).
|
I agree with SD987 and YellowJacket regarding insurance. My Boxster is cheaper to insure than my wife's 2001 Mercedes...not by much...but surprising still.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 PM.
| |