View Single Post
Old 04-16-2007, 01:32 AM   #20
threpwood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 342
2003 S low milage vs 2005 2.7 medium to high milage --> 2003 S
2003 S medium to high milage vs 2005 2.7 low milage --> 2005 2.7
2003 S low milage vs 2005 2.7 low milage --> 2003 S
2003 S high milage vs 2005 2.7 high milage --> 2005 2.7

IMO


Quote:
Originally Posted by sloancarr
As soon as I sell my current vehicle, I'm ready to purchase my long awaited Boxster. As this could happen relatively soon, I'm going to be faced with a tough choice - a 2003 S, or 2005 2.7

For better or worse, it will be used primarially for city driving, with relatively little opportunity to really 'stretch its legs', so I'm thinking that the newer design, lower miles, warranty etc. of the 2005 might be a better bet, but I thought I should get opinions from the aficianados here. Thoughts?

(I'll only be considering pampered, low-mileage vehicles in either case - and find that they are at similar price points)
__________________
2004 Porsche Boxster S
threpwood is offline   Reply With Quote