View Single Post
Old 02-23-2007, 10:10 PM   #66
MNBoxster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bisimoto
Wow..this is so sad...so much happened on the board while I spent more time beating my poor S on the dyno today. I have repeated the results on 17...yes 17 passes with and without the "snork". The data remains the same. For what it is worth, this mod produces 4.6~5.5whp at high rpms. Whew!
Hi,

Well you're certainly getting consistent results. I may be starting to come around.

This is for the 3.2L, I doubt the 2.5L w/o egas, Motronic ME 7.2 and variable intake will achieve anywhere near the same result.

I called a friend who owns a shop w/ 2 inertial dynos, and just for ********************s and giggles, I'm gonna run over there this spring and see what it tells me, even with the tire dynamisicm, I should also get consistent positive results based on your findings. A good engineer is also intuitive and still I have this nagging sense that something's amiss.

But, at least for now - You Da Man! Congrats!

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote