View Single Post
Old 01-27-2020, 06:50 AM   #6
truegearhead
Registered User
 
truegearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Richmond, VA (The Fan)
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG View Post
Well unless you have access to a wind tunnel, you only have a butt dyno to calculate actual pros or cons.

Non tested changes to aero can have detrimental effects

It does look cool however
Well yes, ok, technically you’re right but this is definitely one of those Internet sayings that is mostly bull****. Sure it requires some work to get right but everyone running in non-restricted class has made aerodynamic improvements without wind tunnels or CFD models with fantastic results. You just have to follow proven aerodynamic approaches. My wing knocked almost 3 seconds off my VIR lap time day one (after spending a year looking for tenths of seconds else where). Sure tunning, testing and suspension adjustments were required after the fact to dial the wing in but this stuff isn’t as hard as the internet would lead you to believe. In fact I think aero is easier and lower risk than suspension modifications.

As far as butt dyno’s go track guys have a lot of tools at their disposal now. Not only do we have lap times, segment times, etc but we also have GPS data, lateral acceleration,, braking performance etc that can be over-layed with pre-modification laps. I can tell you how this modification is performing on every inch of the track. Really cool stuff.
__________________
1997 Boxster 4.2L Audi V8 Bi-Turbo
2003 911 C2
NASA HPDE Instructor
truegearhead is offline   Reply With Quote