Quote:
Originally Posted by NewArt
No, TRK is right. Should be replaced.
|
Part # 996.107.147.55 looks zero like that illustrated in the picture. TRK always is spot on, but this isn't meeting the acid test. Are you suggesting that the part in the OP illustration was wrapped with wire loom, because it looks like there's a fairly lengthy run of loom. If you run the part number, it appears at the bend there is maybe 4 inches of the loom-look. The OP illustration looks zero like that.
Someone else have an idea/recommmendation? Maybe OP can share what lurks beneath the loom. Wire? Hard plastic pipe?