Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000SoCalBoxsterS
With regard to de-snorkeling and loss of mpg, I find a 50% difference very hard to believe. If mpg's could be that significantly effected by a simple short tube of plastic I think we would be well on our way to solving the energy problems of the world and reducing gas consumption and prices.  |
I would have to agree. A marginal change in mph maybe, but 50%? Not buying it. Most likely there was some sort of computer computation that was thrown off. A snorkel pull is in no way going to dump twice as much fuel into the engine as a norm setup. The AF ratios and mapping simply wouldn’t allow it to happen.