Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350
That one reminds me of an old Volvo.
|
Regards, Markus
@Nine8six: seems all pretty easy – if you compare it with a tourbillon wrist watch.
I would say the 996 (cw: 0,27/cwa: 0,54) is better than a 2003 986 S (cw: 0,32/cwa; 0,617)
But i think Dr. Yang Proshche has better measurement methods than me. So let's see what will happen.