View Single Post
Old 12-01-2014, 10:54 AM   #7
Jake Raby
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
As to: "Jake looked at this design and fount it had too many drawbacks"- that's probably because his company didn't produce it.
Trust this isn't the case.

It may be the simplest explanation for the opposition, but its not the case.

There are THREE different roller bearing kits that have been developed. EPS is ONE of those three. These are roller bearing kits, not including other forms of retrofit.

The original roller bearing kit was developed in the Pacific Northwest by one single individual.

I have a vehicle here now with a roller bearing kit installed, it has 900 miles since the kit was fitted. The case has been fully documented from A-Z, to include third party verifiers on site.

When there are knockoffs, of knockoffs being produced, its a little tough to tell which component is which. Thats why I've bought or observed one of all of them, just to compare- here's the one that Porsche Land sent me a while back. It comes in a plain white wrapper, no packing material, no illustrated parts break downs, and no instructions at all.

No extraction tools are supplied, or recommended. I guess they use ours; like everyone else.



Quote:
same as with buying rebuilt engines. It's not rocket science, or flight to the moon
Some of us think that it is; and treat it like it has wings rather than wheels.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist

Last edited by Jake Raby; 12-01-2014 at 10:59 AM.
Jake Raby is offline