Quote:
Originally Posted by Nine8Six
I get it... the bronco guy doesn't have that 'comprehensive' option and fight to have Jake at fault
So that's why this Bronco dude is making a lot of noise (I was really wondering why?!). Here the insurance co doesn't allow drivers on the roads without this "comprehensive" little addition. You just have no choice to get/pay it
So not only Jake stole his GF (mentioned in previous post) and never got well with him, in a way he also managed to trash his bronco and its' owner's wallet on that one. Bad Bad Bad Jake lol
I wouldn't look for a lawyer if I were Jake.... I would invest this money into finding a real BIGjake for personal protection for a few weeks  |
Not having to pay comprehensive, if you have tickets, accidents, drunk driving, etc, can be a cost saver, if your driving a cheap car. My step son totaled a car a few months back. It could cost 2 grand or more to insure insure. He can get a beater car and drive it for 3 years and be way ahead. In the States I've lived in - we don't force people to have comprehensive, but you have to have liability to be responsible to other guy. We have 50 of them, so some other States may vary.