View Single Post
Old 10-12-2013, 12:28 PM   #31
Jake Raby
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by epapp View Post
Skeptic or not, stick around.

Yes it is arrogant to say real engineering...blah blah blah. We are allow working towards the same goal here, I just have to make myself feel like my solution is better so I will actually build the damn thing.

I will promise one thing: my IMSB health monitoring solution will be conclusive. If I release it, it will be because the data is reasonably accurate and can be replicated.

Once I can judge my IMSB health, I will probably need to crowd source for some more data. Since I don't have 10 boxsters laying around, I'll need a way to gather data of different IMSB healths to make any kind of judgement.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free
Be prepared to force an engine failure under controlled conditions with the system employed. I sacrificed two engines during the development of the IMSG, one of which was specifically built to be killed by installing an IMSB into it that was already at stage 3 IMSB failure.

If you need to gather this data and gather the data I do have these engines in my lab and they are available. Currently one of them is being used for similar research, so a compound test may be possible.

Projections and assumptions don't cut it.

But it wouldn't be cheap.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote