View Single Post
Old 09-01-2013, 06:05 PM   #7
sb01box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 308
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wilson View Post
You're trying to make a connection where there is none.
I thought there's two features to DMFW.
1) decouples the trans from the engine when the clutch is fully engaged so as not to have two resonance beat on each other. didn't think that the difference in the clutch (wet or dry or "other") had any impact.
2) easier clutch engagement by not transferring the engine power pulse directly to the wheel.

my car has 137K miles, clutch is still good but it's getting there. so I am thinking about the LWFW path as an alternative to DMFW
sb01box is offline   Reply With Quote