Quote:
Originally Posted by mustang2porsche
well i did forget to mention it was a purpose built convertible, but i see the convertible part an added charm, but even without it, it would be purpose built none the less. i thought of a carrera, but i heard that it is a bit harder to control on a track which i might see about 3- 6 times a year, and occasional "spirited" driving. just feels like a boxster is right and the initial cost for a boxster is cheaper than a carrera ( in my general area). personally i also think the boxster looks better than a carrera, but that's personal preference. i'm still wondering if i can "drive" the car harder than what most do on the back roads.
|
If you get one with traction control you can't hardly let it get away from you. If you don't have it, it's like anything else, you have to be able t drive and know when to keep your foot in it and steer out of trouble. I've had both. I prefer to have traction control but my 3.6 Boxster has no nannies, other that anti lock brakes.
__________________
2001 Boxster S 3.6, 2003 E46 M3, 94 968 Cab, 80 911 Weissach Edition, BMW 1200 CLS
|