Thread: who would win?
View Single Post
Old 12-11-2005, 10:21 PM   #9
TriGem2k
Registered User
 
TriGem2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,431
Send a message via AIM to TriGem2k
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
A manual 2.5L with a good driver could beat the merc. A tip on the other hand would may have some troubles keeping up. The CLK 430 must be quite a heifer considering how slow it is with that V8 power!

2.5L with stick(could not find #'s for Tip)
http://www.car-stats.com/stats/showstats/showstatsgivenid.aspx

2002 CLK 430
http://www.car-videos.net/performance/view.asp?id1=178&id2=0

Boxster S for comparisons sake
http://www.car-stats.com/stats/showstats/showstatsgivenid.aspx

996 cabbie for comparsions sake
http://www.car-videos.net/performance/view.asp?id1=178&id2=0

You might want to question the credibility of the stats listed as according to that site the 2.5L 201HP Boxster time 0-60 is 6.2 seconds but the 2001 220HP Boxster is 6.6????? Ya can you explain that one please?

Ya the 2.5L is more of a 7second car 0-60....sorry to disappoint you guys but the 2.5L wasn’t very fast. I’m not hating on the boxster either I have a 2001 and we also owned a 1997 until it was stolen.

On top of all things ive never been a Mercedes fan even though we own multiple models. But im not gonna sit here and give credit where its not due.
TriGem2k is offline   Reply With Quote