Thread: 3.4
View Single Post
Old 08-03-2012, 01:11 PM   #8
jaykay
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
Its always been this way. The 3.4 has historically had the most issues. Its the only engine that has an equal amount of IMS/Cracked Heads/ Cylinder failures.

Yesterday we received 5 failure calls, all but one of them were from 3.4 base engines... 5 calls in one day is a new record, puts us at 7 for the week which also tied the record, but we still have today to go.

The 3.2S engine from 2000 is one of the best IMHO, Dual Row IMS bearing, late IMS drive chain and larger capillaries inside the cylinder heads make it show up less here than all other Boxster engines combined. It also has the most substantial cylinder walls and they very, very seldom ever have cylinder issues.

This comes from trend data collected and first hand experience supported by years of research.
Regarding 2000 3.2s Jake's opinion/data was echoed by a Porsche service tech that I talked to a number of years ago. He mentioned that he had seen coolant/cracked head issues though. He referred to the 2000 as "a good year"

I please to see a dual row IMS bearing when I pulled it.
__________________
986 00S

Last edited by jaykay; 08-03-2012 at 01:41 PM.
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote