View Single Post
Old 03-14-2012, 01:40 PM   #21
pothole
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by thstone View Post
The real question is whether the 981 is the equivalent of the 280Z (the luxury bloated follow-on to the success of the 240Z and 260Z)? Has the Boxster finally jumped the shark?

Based on the reviews, I'd say yes on both counts. The new 981 isn't new enough or better enough to warrant an upgrade from a 986 or a 987 as far as I can see.
I'm not a huge fan of the 981's looks or the fact it's bigger, but I think that comparison is probably unfair.

It's actually lighter and more powerful than the old model and the lightness is thanks to a shift to largely aluminium construction. So it's hard to argue that the engineering integrity isn't there.

Personally, I think it's a natural progression from the 987 and a largely pretty impressive one even if I think the rear end is horrid and the electric steering a step too far.

It's not for me, the 981, but they haven't jumped the sharp.
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote